• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Donald Trump be Sentenced to Jail for 34 Felonies?

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Can you quote me (correctly) where I said that? Or are you just lying about me again because your own error was shown to you but you can't admit to making it?
I could. And I would if you did not accompany your posts with false accusations and false claims.

If you want others to follow the rules of polite debate you cannot do so by using falsehoods and personal attacks..
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Oh my! As you already learned, the skydiver wasn't engaged in a conversation with Biden.
Do you see your error now? Would you like me to show you again (and again, and again)?
Wow! More mimicking. Thank you for admitting that you were wrong. And you need to pay attention. I did not say that they were engaged in a conversation. Unlike your hero Biden is polite. He politely went up to the man that he wanted to talk to. You should try to be polite some day. It can work wonders.

When you cannot get the argument of the other side right you can never refute it.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
I could. And I would if you did not accompany your posts with false accusations and false claims.

If you want others to follow the rules of polite debate you cannot do so by using falsehoods and personal attacks..
Now you're just projecting again.
Are you ready to back up the accusations you made against me, or are you going to continue waving your surrender flag?
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Wow! More mimicking. Thank you for admitting that you were wrong. And you need to pay attention. I did not say that they were engaged in a conversation. Unlike your hero Biden is polite. He politely went up to the man that he wanted to talk to. You should try to be polite some day. It can work wonders.

When you cannot get the argument of the other side right you can never refute it.
Polite? When the skydivers came down, Biden was the only person to NOT applaud them.
Perhaps you should pay better attention to the videos you base your arguments on. It might help you look better here.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Oh my! As you already learned, the skydiver wasn't engaged in a conversation with Biden.
Do you see your error now? Would you like me to show you again (and again, and again)?
I thought there was no skydiver because the video was taken on someone's cell phone and held horizontally
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
I thought there was no skydiver because the video was taken on someone's cell phone and held horizontally
Is that your understanding of how cell phone video works; that if the image of a person isn't captured in the frame, they weren't there?
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Is that your understanding of how cell phone video works; that if the image of a person isn't captured in the frame, they weren't there?

you the one who made that one up while trying to say the video wasn't cropped.

Video not cropped. It's the way video looks when a smartphone is held upright instead of horizontal when taking a video. You'll see some examples of that on Youtube as well. Sometimes it's just easier to hold the phone upright, same as when you're using it to talk to someone or do texting.

It's interesting how you are now talking about what is happening in the video in areas that were cropped off.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
You are putting a spin on the story that you cannot justify.

The last 3 pages of this thread has my posts that show my accurate observations, ***STAFF EDIT***
Good thing everyone can see it (even if you can't/won't).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

F1fan

Veteran Member
The last 3 pages of this thread has my posts that show my accurate observations, followed by your lies.
Good thing everyone can see it (even if you can't/won't).
Actually we observe SubZone as having exceptional integrity, and you parrot far right wing disinformation. The well educated use reputable media and can recognize those who use poor quality disinformation. Your bold claim here is much like Trump's usual lies. Trump takes down everyone, and it is your reputation to ruin by aligning with him.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Actually we observe SubZone as having exceptional integrity, and you parrot far right wing disinformation. The well educated use reputable media and can recognize those who use poor quality disinformation. Your bold claim here is much like Trump's usual lies. Trump takes down everyone, and it is your reputation to ruin by aligning with him.
My information actually came from the video someone posted in post #708. In #710, I showed what was taking place, along with the exact times so it would be easy for people like you to verify.
No "far right wing" anything. But it's obvious you didn't even look. You simply slander, just like the rest of your Leftist buddies.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The last 3 pages of this thread has my posts that show my accurate observations, ***STAFF EDIT***
Good thing everyone can see it (even if you can't/won't).
No, I will not do so for you because there is no point to it. I showed how you were wrong. Others showed how you were wrong. You were the one that kept claiming that the video was not edited. Even after it was shown to be edited.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
My information actually came from the video someone posted in post #708. In #710, I showed what was taking place, along with the exact times so it would be easy for people like you to verify.
No "far right wing" anything. But it's obvious you didn't even look. You simply slander, just like the rest of your Leftist buddies.
No, you made unsubstantiated claims that I later showed to be at least partially wrong and the context showed that you were probably wrong for the rest.
 
Top