We Never Know
No Slack
"why not go after the software manufacturer of Trump's accountant since it allowed for the payment to be entered as a legal expense rather than an "election interference"I don't agree with how sellers and manufacturers have been targeted for the actions of criminals with legally purchased items. But since it's been the case, why not go after the software manufacturer of Trump's accountant since it allowed for the payment to be entered as a legal expense rather than an "election interference" expense as was the accusation?
You're joking right?
Lets say if election interference was an available choice, do you think they would have chosen that choice?
And if they did chose that choice, wouldn't that be acknowledging to committing that crime?