Nonetheless, titilation. Attention is part of the process.
Ah, here's the problem. You're equating getting turned on by somebody as objectifying them. I don't. A lot of people don't. Many people retain their titillation from a connection beyond a nice rack. In fact,
most people do. People who enjoy looking a pictures, or pause an X-rated movie, for pleasure don't just look at the picture itself,
but fantasize about what that image is doing with them.
Now, when people have a flesh-and-blood person in front of them dancing erotically, most people don't want distance themselves by reducing them to nothing more than a sum of their body parts. But some do, and they're jerks (men or women, btw).
Of course they'd love hearing it. It's part of what gets them going. Feeling good about themselves is part of the sexploitation aspect. You can dress it up all you want, but they're still there for the fleshly aspect. If they went to a girl they didn't find attractive just for that attention maybe that would be one occasion of a counter-example.
I don't have to dress it up. It's a phenomenon that's across the sex industry that includes male strippers, gay/lesbian strip clubs, and burlesque. Humans are visual, are attracted to people who are confident enough to take their clothes off and reveal a part of themselves to them, enjoy watching that somebody have creativity and agility, and make a connection to them. It isn't just a simplistic male gaze that magically objectifies women. We are ALL human, after all. And human sexuality is a fascinating subject.
This is why strip clubs attract people. Culturally, it's considered a "vice" business like the corner liquor store. But people.....straight, gay/lesbian, trans, woman....have fun in establishments like these many times for the reasons I mentioned above.
I highly doubt it's mainly for the "attention" as in the usual sense of "attention". I'll have to look up this subject to see just how many men are going at it for the "Conversation" as a major aspect of it. As far as I'm concerned, those are just perks to make them the preferred service over the others in what is otherwise, still just objectification. So far, none of this has exempted them from being 'Objectified" even if the conversation and attention were a major aspect of it.
Men like attention. And having attention from a woman who is confident enough to take her clothes off? It's priceless, according to some.
I would say the grand majority of patrons objectify women. If that's entirely on their conscience, then...exactly. So you have no problem then with encouraging behavior that will fuel this objectification? If so, that's fine, I'm just saying that this is one particular aspect of Feminism of which others may disagree.
LOL you keep wanting this to be a male gaze issue, don't you? I say the grand majority of men don't objectify women because the grand majority of men aren't heartless jerks. But hey, if you're simply projecting your own issues onto the rest of males on the planet, and assuming they're all in the same camp, that's on you, buddy.
The perspective you've given is a really a low opinion of men considering them to be little more than dry-humping animals who sees women as nothing more than smiling T&A if she dared take her clothes off in front of them. You've also tried convincing people that a woman's virginity has (and should) have a price tag on it. Objectification of women doesn't happen because of what she does, says, acts, behaves, etc.
Thats ****-shaming.
I see where you're going here. And I can see I'm not the only member who has picked up on it.