Ah, that bastion of intelligence. Where religious preachers are so wise & profound they link seismic activity to women breaching their barbaric standards of modesty.
Look be realistic!!!
U truly live in fantasy
Of the two of us, I'm not the one who believes a man was literally carried to Heaven on a flying horse.
Who can deny that men are lecherous and can't control their unbridled passions so the best and rational thing that we can do to protect women from those men is to wear hijab
When a woman wears it men know that this woman wants to protect her glory and doesn't want to be trampled by men
The best thing society can do is to teach men to curb their lusts and exercise some self-restraint. If your God-sent solution is so effective you'll have to explain to me why it is that women still get raped or assaulted because men happen to want sex with them - even if they're veiled. Or, gods forbid, they have acid thrown in their faces for rejecting male advances. This is exactly what happens when society tells men they're not responsible for their desires and resultant actions but women are. It's pure patriarchy and it's abhorrent.
But a woman that reveals her beauty and her body to men shouldn't expect that men respect him
This is exactly what I mean. You tell us that your way is better and then show is why it's actually worse. You claim to respect women but if they dare to dress as they wish with the reasonable expectation of not being harassed, ridiculed or assaulted you decide that they don't deserve respect. Has it ever occurred to you to respect women because they're human beings first & foremost, regardless of what they wear?
Something that u overlook is that we at first place are animals by reason we are human
And most of the people don't use their reason and instead are slaves of their passions
That happens when society tells them not to take responsibility for their thoughts, feelings & desires. Like in Iran and plenty of other Muslim countries.
I have and have noticed you tend to blame the West for other things there as well. This is not surprising.
In Iran صفویه is a good example of it also this one wasn't theocratic
Uh, pardon? Could you explain what that word in Persian is, please? I can't find a decent translator.
Saudi Arabia is a creature of US
It just produces terrorists but weapons and information and plans and everything else is by support of US
Hillary Clinton says in one of her books that she traveled to more than 100 countries to gather criminals in Iraq and Syria
I agree. Americans can be really bad for ignoring international law. That doesn't make Iran and its tyrants any better. Do you think the immorality of the infidel excuses the excesses and immoral actions of your own political leaders?
Actually do u know that isis in Iraq and Syria and Afghanistan don't kill American army???
Islamic State don't the American army because the American army isn't in these countries any more. They either pulled out or were never there to begin with.
Human is human
Arrogant countries since pretend believe in God while they don't can use it again but a clergy doesn't allow himself to produce or use them at all.
How do you know they pretended to believe in God? Can you see into the minds of past people? Can you tell us when exactly they stopped believing in God in relation to the A-bomb? Was it when the Oppenheimer Project first began? Was it when they tested the first atomic device? Was it when the Enola Gay was in the air? Etc
That's what I am insist on
Theocracy is best and pious people should be leaders not others that corruption is part of their existence!
This idea never works in practice because the end result is these 'pious people' are given unchallengeable power which inevitably causes corruption every single time. People will always become corrupt if their actions are divorced from any real consequences. That's why theocracies never work: the powerful inevitably lose all form of accountability. Theocracies end up being repressive nightmares against anybody who doesn't toe the party line 100%. Hell, they're even repressive for those who agree because they don't have the option of freely being able to change their minds. Iran is actually a classic example of why theocracies fail:
- Religious minorities are restricted to their own segregated legislature with limited powers while unelected Muslims can make laws for everybody;
- Non-Muslim faiths can't accept converts because by-and-large they'd be Muslims converting out of Islam which is forbidden;
- Women are subjected to ****-shaming, body-shaming social attitudes which lead to them being attacked for daring to refuse mens' advances. If Iranian men grew a pair, manned up and took responsibility for themselves then maybe women wouldn't have it so bad;
- People in your country can end up in trouble if they earn the Ayatollah's ire - and nothing else. They aren't necessarily criminals; he just doesn't like them. That is pretty corrupt.
Besides I told u Islam is something and Muslims's actions is something else like other religions
So now all of a sudden there's no link between behaviour & belief. That was awfully fast & convenient. You quoted a Quranic verse in one of your previous posts to justify why Islam is a moral belief system. The "it is as if he has killed all of mankind" verse, I believe. Clearly there is a link between belief & behaviour when it suits you.
