I.S.L.A.M617
Illuminatus
I have a penis... The word is "server"...I don't think anyone who advocates doing away with tipping also thinks we should keep waitresses at $2 an hour.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have a penis... The word is "server"...I don't think anyone who advocates doing away with tipping also thinks we should keep waitresses at $2 an hour.
I have a penis... The word is "server"...
I have a penis... The word is "server"...
1)We'd get a lot less customers if food costs went up so that we could make a higher wage (even if that higher wage was the federal minimum), so there would be less tips, less shifts, and less money overall.
2)I would never wait tables for minimum wage. It would be too much work for too little reward. Again, I make more than a police officer does in my city by waiting tables. Even the terrible tips add up to making more money than I would in retail or other jobs that pay near minimum wage. The increased wage would have to be pretty high, which would in turn discourage customers from eating at the establishment (see #1)
Where I work, we don't tip out the kitchen staff; only the bartenders, bussers, and food runners (all of whom deserve a tip-out). The kitchen staff makes a decent hourly wage and doesn't deal with half of the problems the front-of-house staff does.
OK, lets do things your way. Where will these extra wages come from? If I was running a food establishment and wanted to stay open, my wage costs must be within a certain percentage.
If I paid my help more, I would have to charge more for the food. That would increase my "to go" orders prices. People who just want food should not pay as much as someone who spends an hour being waited on hand and foot.
Another issue is, if my help did not have to bust their chops for tips, my service would decline as there would be no incentive for on and beyond service any more.
To bottom line things, the way you want things to work, we would all pay more for less.
It could, but probably wouldn't. From my experience, a lot of people go to restaurants because they want the power of ordering someone around for an hour. This is especially applicable to the people that don't tip; they always seem to have the most requests..
Now in thinking about it???No working for tips could help reduce server abuse.Like in the sense you are my personal slave and I can treat you however because I'm paying you .
Hmmm...Food for thought.
OK, lets do things your way. Where will these extra wages come from? If I was running a food establishment and wanted to stay open, my wage costs must be within a certain percentage.
If I paid my help more, I would have to charge more for the food. That would increase my "to go" orders prices. People who just want food should not pay as much as someone who spends an hour being waited on hand and foot.
Another issue is, if my help did not have to bust their chops for tips, my service would decline as there would be no incentive for on and beyond service any more.
ISo yes, in the current system, we are morally obligated to tip, otherwise you are essentially stealing someone's labor.
I'm glad you brought this up. Folks in Walnart are NOT customer oriented. In other words, they suck. I don't feel special when I shop there and while I don't tip them, they don't work for 2.10 an hour either.So what, that's the same as any other job - do you tip in Wall Mart? No, I thought not.
What a steaming pile of dung. The server is working for ME. I am tipping them more than their employer is paying them and they should be doing what I need them to do to make my experience enjoyable.Even so, that does not mean YOU should be paying the wages of the wait staff, because that is the responsibility of the employer.
No, you are wrong. The manager does not know how well I am being treated, nor can he withhold any wages like the customer can.If he can't make his staff work well, then that's his problem.
Customers would be paying the same amount of money. It's just be a $120 bill rather than a $100 bill plus a 20% tip/service charge. There is obviously a psychological aspect to that but it could be managed with a careful transition. I suspect the vast majority of people wouldn't even notice after the hype dies down - prices go up and down all the time and we're generally oblivious to it.1)We'd get a lot less customers if food costs went up so that we could make a higher wage (even if that higher wage was the federal minimum), so there would be less tips, less shifts, and less money overall.
Who said anything about minimum wage? As with the customers, the wait staff should take home a similar amount of money to what they do now, just less variable and with more consistent taxation (which would only disadvantage those currently defrauding the system). Some wait staff could even be better off since employers would be prevented from taking all the tips and only topping up staff's pay to the minimum wage.2)I would never wait tables for minimum wage. It would be too much work for too little reward.
If those staff deserve that money, why should it be the wait staffs' responsibility to pay it (regardless of how well they're tipped)? Why shouldn't employers pay all their staff a decent hourly wage? You're basically arguing for employers to screw over some of their staff and expect their colleagues to sort it out. That would probably be illegal in any other field of work.Where I work, we don't tip out the kitchen staff; only the bartenders, bussers, and food runners (all of whom deserve a tip-out). The kitchen staff makes a decent hourly wage and doesn't deal with half of the problems the front-of-house staff does.
LOL, the company is making exactly what the business model is set up for them to make. They cannot pay more wages without raising their prices which would still cost me money.He is not working for you at all, you are just being made to feel like that so the company can make more profit , at your expense!
You are ripping yourself off, willingly - that's rather absurd.
I don't think anyone who advocates doing away with tipping also thinks we should keep waitresses at $2 an hour.
So yes, in the current system, we are morally obligated to tip, otherwise you are essentially stealing someone's labor. But no, tipping is not inherently "what decent people do" nor is it something you must do if you expect to be provided a service, as Dallas indicated. It is simply the way our culture has decided to pay people in specific industries-- a method which could be changed.
The server is the employee of the tipping customer? Does this create any obligations on the part of the customer?What a steaming pile of dung. The server is working for ME. I am tipping them more than their employer is paying them and they should be doing what I need them to do to make my experience enjoyable.
Is food service the only industry where managers are clueless about the performance of their employees?No, you are wrong. The manager does not know how well I am being treated, nor can he withhold any wages like the customer can.
Some servers in upscale establishments in the big cities make more money than medical professionals do.I think it has a lot to do with social hierarchy. We tip for jobs that were traditionally "lower class". Medical professionals aren't "lower class", so they don't get tips.
Managers can withhold bonuses; they can't withhold base pay. Why isn't that enough for you?
Some servers in upscale establishments in the big cities make more money than medical professionals do.