The sanctions were wrong because they do not target the government or military. They target the civilian population and thus are illegal under international humanitarian law. It is no different than bombing civilians and one could argue worse as the lack of medical supplies and food kill seems to kill more children. Is that ok because
Saddam won't conform to the our wants?
So you think it would be ok to feed the hand that does the killing,Sadaam was only the tip of the Iceburg that included Military and security forces the very same People that carried out the massacre of the Kurds.
Uranium enrichment is legal under international law and we do it all the time. Why do you think the EU is so critical of the sanctions? It's clear Iran won't conform to the US and why should they? What's the point of making more enemies?
U.S. sanctions against Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Personally i agree Iran will not agree,as it stands why should they,however when somebody threatens to wipe another Race of people from the face of the Earth and then aquires the means to do it,it puts things in a different light.
Saddam was a bad leader to his people. Does that merrit the death and destruction we've handed the Iraqis?
How about the death and destruction caused by non Iraqi insurgents? do the People they've killed count or is it only people killed by the West that count .
If it's from a muslim it's their business.