Troublemane
Well-Known Member
Some people are happy eating a plain, baloney sandwich every day...and some people go for the "All You Can Eat" Buffet table at Shoney's! 
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Should you have sex with only one person?
- Thread starter leahrachelle
- Start date
Mike182
Flaming Queer
I voted no. If you dedicate yourself to a monogamous relationship then fine, only sleep with that person, but if you break up, you shouldn't then be restricted to never sleeping with another person. I also see nothing wrong with threesomes when you are single, or entering into an open relationship.
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Is that one at a time?Yes, no, or it depends - and explain please
I say yes, for no more of a reason than that is what feels right to me. And that is all I need.
Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
Hell it's pretty true for me, but it doesn't make my relationships any better or longer lasting.
Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
You don't really have control over your tastes. Standards and sense are what we balance love with.
Buttercup
Veteran Member
I agree. As crazy as I am about my husband, I'm definitely still attracted to other men (and sometimes women). I know he's the same way.
You can be strictly monogamous yet be attracted to others all the time. You just never do anything about it.
Smoke
Done here.
Absolutely, you should only have sex with one person all your life. Of course, whenever I want to have sex I have to fly to Ohio, but it's a small price to pay for morality. You should never have sex with more than one person, even if that person dies.
You should also eat only one food, watch only one television show, drive only one car, live in only one house, have only one child, vote for only one candidate, have only one friend, have only one job, read only one book, participate in only one sport, shop at only one store, sing only one song, and take only one photo. There are entirely too many people who don't value commitment and the virtue of making the right choice in the first place. If you make the right choice, that should be enough for you. If not -- too bad.
You should also eat only one food, watch only one television show, drive only one car, live in only one house, have only one child, vote for only one candidate, have only one friend, have only one job, read only one book, participate in only one sport, shop at only one store, sing only one song, and take only one photo. There are entirely too many people who don't value commitment and the virtue of making the right choice in the first place. If you make the right choice, that should be enough for you. If not -- too bad.
Smoke
Done here.
How did you discover what their goal is? None of the dogs I've known seem to put much thought into family planning or the perpetuation of the bloodline.Their only goal is to reproduce as much as they can
pray4me
Active Member
Yes because in an ideal world this would happen. You also shouldn't smoke, shouldn't drink to excess, should be kind to everyone. This is not, however, an ideal world. We are human and very prone to weakness and mistakes. So even though I beleive everyone should limit sex to one person, that does not mean I look down on those who do not. So far I have, I hope it will remain that way.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
No exceptions?
Comicaze247
See the previous line
It depends. To each their own. I've only had sex with two people, the second one, much more experienced. Having fewer partners apparently hasn't affected natural talent, as she says
Though some people want more partners, some don't. It isn't a case of should or should not. It's a case of would or would not.
Though some people want more partners, some don't. It isn't a case of should or should not. It's a case of would or would not.
DallasApple
Depends Upon My Mood..
Thats exactly why..its a struggle for control and "power"..And I dare to say flat out "hatred" in general of women(or a specific woman) is involved as well.
Love
Dallas
pray4me
Active Member
I think the only exception would be if your first were to die. Still, like I said this is just my belief and I don't judge those who do not abide by it.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
What about Idol Worshipers?
pray4me
Active Member
What is this supposed to mean? I'm not sure what you're asking please clarify.
FatherHeathenLover
New Member
It depends whether yourself counts as a person. If so, then yes.
mohammed_beiruti
Active Member
You may have sex only by legal marriage, you may not marry more than one at once.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Idol worship is one of the Biblically allowed reasons for divorce.
If after you divorce on the grounds of fornication, I.E. Idol Worship, Is it in your opinion alright to have sex with another, or are you stuck only having sex with your living ex?
DallasApple
Depends Upon My Mood..
Some people are happy eating a plain, baloney sandwich every day...and some people go for the "All You Can Eat" Buffet table at Shoney's!
Well thats not fair! Why is monogomy equated to "plain boloney?If two people are really into each other..they can be a steak and lobster dinner one day..stuffed tenderloin another..a loaded baked potato the next..and so on.
Monogomy doesnt equate to monotony.
Love
Dallas
Last edited: