• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Some things I am noticing

We Never Know

No Slack
I can see why you get offended at being called a homophobe or transphobes. They always do.

Anyway homosexuals are also natural. Literally because the occur in nature but also because many social animals have social strategies where not all members breed. Breeding isn't the only positive thing to bring to a social unit.

Having a prefix doesn't mean natural and having no prefix doesn't mean unnatural. Prefix just defines the context of the subject being spoken about. I'm also a white American woman, which is important when talking about how race or national issues effect women. White is not the standard. And neither is heterosexual or cisgendered.

"I can see why you get offended at being called a homophobe or transphobes. They always do."

Who's they? Do you have another label? Lol
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
"I can see why you get offended at being called a homophobe or transphobes. They always do."

Who's they? Do you have another label? Lol
"They" are people who demonstrate homophobia or transphobia by trying to frame homosexuals or transgender people as mentally ill or unnatural, then get mad when called on it.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I can see why you get offended at being called a homophobe or transphobe. They always do. And argue until they're blue in the face that otherizing or setting someone up as 'unnatural' for what they are is not being an *******. Lol

Anyway homosexuals are also natural. Literally because the occur in nature but also because many social animals have social strategies where not all members breed. Breeding isn't the only positive thing to bring to a social unit.

Having a prefix doesn't mean natural and having no prefix doesn't mean unnatural. Prefix just defines the context of the subject being spoken about. I'm also a white American woman, which is important when talking about how race or national issues effect women. White is not the standard. And neither is heterosexual or cisgendered.

Lets save us both some time. We clearly disagree with several things. You have personal attacked me more than once.
I haven't done that to you in anyway.
The worst I did was laugh at one of your post when you told me to take my own advise and I recieved a warning for funny abuse
It seems you are trying to get a rise out of me but I assure you that won't happen so put your effort into something better.
So how about you ignore my posts and I will ignore your post and problem solved.
Sound good to you?
 
Last edited:

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I am not "they". Could you not comprehend post #93. Geesh!!!!
Saying that you don't think someone is terrible or should be stigmatizing doesn't change that calling someone mentally ill for being homosexual or trans, or saying that they're unnatural, is both terrible and stigmatizing. No different than it would be than if I called religious people or a POC mentally ill and unnatural. People can have ****ty, hurtful and ignorant opinions. Having an opinion doesn't entitle that opinion respect.

You can ignore me if you want. But I'm going to call it as I see it.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Saying that you don't think someone is terrible or should be stigmatizing doesn't change that calling someone mentally ill for being homosexual or trans, or saying that they're unnatural, is both terrible and stigmatizing. No different than it would be than if I called religious people or a POC mentally ill and unnatural. People can have ****ty, hurtful and ignorant opinions. Having an opinion doesn't entitle that opinion respect.

You can ignore me if you want. But I'm going to call it as I see it.

Again you are making up BS!

I never said they are mentally ill. If I did post where I did.
I don't think I said its unnatural, if I did post where I did.

However I did say the DSM-5 is used in their diagnosis and treatment,, which is fact.

I did say I don't think its normal and that's my opinion.

My question is why are you taking it all so personal, falsely accusing me of things and making personal attacks against me?

To the other mods. Do you want to intervene or wait until I get another unwarranted warning?
No one is above the rules or law

Just to make sure its seen.
@Polymath257
@Rival
@JustGeorge
@Brickjectivity
@SalixIncendium

Just trying to get your attention here.
 
Last edited:

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Trying to get mods to discuss moderation publicly, which is against rule 2, isn't gonna cut it. If you want to talk to them, make a site feedback thread.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Trying to get mods to discuss moderation publicly, which is against rule 2, isn't gonna cut it. If you want to talk to them, make a site feedback thread.

Lol. I didn't ask them to discuss anything publicly. I just want them to take notice of things and to look them over. I guess another warning will be coming or worse right? Your threat is noted
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
My approach to understanding people who "claim"
to be transgender is to listen. Lo! There appears
to be far more to the condition than mere whim.
It is indeed a real condition with a basis in science.
The power of listening greatly exceeds the power
of preconception.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
You should read them as well. And as a mod you should set an example. Personal attacks, which you have done to me are also against the rules.
If I had a nickel for every time someone thought they were being attacked for having behavior called out, I'd be richer than Elon Musk.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
My approach to understanding people who "claim"
to be transgender is to listen. Lo! There appears
to be far more to the condition than mere whim.
It is indeed a real condition with a basis in science.
The power of listening greatly exceeds the power
of preconception.

Thats true. Just because someone doesn't agree doesn't make them an enemy.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Again you are making up BS!

I never said they are mentally ill. If I did post where I did.
I don't think I said its unnatural, if I did post where I did.

However I did say the DSM-5 is used in their diagnosis and treatment,, which is fact.

I did say I don't think its normal and that's my opinion.
The DSM-V has been used to diagnose and treat gender dysphoria, which not all transgender people have and some people who aren't transgender at all (such as intersex) do have.
You have repeatedly said it's mental/social/feeling and not science.
And you framed cis (though you object to the term) as natural. Do you not think trans is unnatural, then?

Sounds like you're trying to have your cake and eat it, too.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
The DSM-V has been used to diagnose and treat gender dysphoria, which not all transgender people have and some people who aren't transgender at all (such as intersex) do have.
You have repeatedly said it's mental/social/feeling and not science.
And you framed cis (though you object to the term) as natural. Do you not think trans is unnatural, then?

Sounds like you're trying to have your cake and eat it, too.

"gender dysphoria, which not all transgender people have"

Again where did I say they all have that? Quit making up BS.
 
Top