As bigots go, you're one of the best.As a "gay folk" myself, I can attest to that!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As bigots go, you're one of the best.As a "gay folk" myself, I can attest to that!
And what is it you believe "talk therapy" can do? I can only think of one aim -- since talk therapy isn't going to change the "equipment," talk therapy MUST be directed to altering the mind, to change one's deepest feelings about who one is to be someone else.AFAIK there are no perfect solutions. But I believe that talk therapy is - statistically - a far, far, far better solution than drugs and surgeries.
And you also elevate a penis or vagina over the mind -- and the mind is where meaning actually IS.Meaning is the highest value and lasting meaning is to be valued over short term meaning. I believe these to be universal truths.
Eh, I maybe need to think my response to this through.
But there's a reason why 2nd and 3rd world countries are cringing and laughing at us on this issue.
We've got it backward - and, once again, toxic capitalism is to blame: this time, it's preying on kids going through puberty and having identity issues. "Trans Healthcare" is nothing more than a pretty marketing brand.
Right, meaning resides in the mind. Not the brain.And you also elevate a penis or vagina over the mind -- and the mind is where meaning actually IS.
Please provide an example of one without the other.Right, meaning resides in the mind. Not the brain.
I would interpret "metaphysical reality" to mean an idea, doctrine or posited reality outside of human sense perception. How is it you see "male" or "female" as being "outside human sense perception?"And, no I don’t solely equate gender to biology. Gender has a metaphysical reality, but there is no such thing as each of us having a “true gender”.
The key point here is that the drugs and surgeries are irreversible, dangerous, and have no proven efficacy.I have no idea why you are speaking as if people had to stick to one single procedure. I am in favor of talk therapy, as the first line of care. But if talk therapy doesn't work after some time, and particularly if the very own professional administering it sees it is not going to work properly, then further measures must be taken.
I am going to give you a personal example. I used to go to a psychologist many years ago, and among the many things we talked about I mentioned I felt upset because I still had acne past my teen years. He already knew me for many months when I brought this up. It wasn't anything severe, but it annoyed me quite a bunch. The literal first he said was: "Have you tried isotretinoin?". Simple as that, he figured that this was a much simpler and efficient solution than using up our time together trying to deal with that problem. And it was! That's what I did, and problem solved. Obviously he wasn't the one who prescribed the medication. I went to a dermatologist and he agreed isotretinoin was my best chance.
The point here is that we ought to let medical professionals evaluate the patients individually to determine what is the best treatment, rather than trying to fix everything with a broad brush.
Is it impossible that truths can exist outside of empirical truth?Please provide an example of one without the other.
This is a fair point.It would make sense that where gender and sexuality have intersecting roles and relationships, and are subjected to the same social scrutiny, folks who don't follow the prescribed roles would band together.
If you are used to privilege, equality is seen as a loss.Tyrants see themselves as perpetual victims, blinding themselves to their tyranny.
The key point here is that the drugs and surgeries are irreversible, dangerous, and have no proven efficacy.
As for the meta-studies, I did not provide a link in that post, but I believe that in the links I provided there are links to or mentions of meta-studies.
And what is it you believe "talk therapy" can do? I can only think of one aim -- since talk therapy isn't going to change the "equipment," talk therapy MUST be directed to altering the mind, to change one's deepest feelings about who one is to be someone else.
Perhaps -- but what value could it have if it is not empirical? Everything may be possible if not based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience, but likewise all of those same things may be impossible.Is it impossible that truths can exist outside of empirical truth?
If you are used to parasitically leeching meaning off of the marginalized, then to stop would be seen as a loss.If you are used to privilege, equality is seen as a loss.
And from the '60s to about the '00s many groups have won (some) equality and if not that, then at least recognition. Women, POC, gays - all the people a WASP could look down on are no longer seen as inferior. A scary perspective for the entitled that now even trans people may get the right to pursue happiness. They might even have to work for a piece of self-confidence instead of relying on their status.
Didn't we answer that in recent debates? The phenotypical sex only develops during pregnancy. Without hormonal influences every XY male would only express female characteristics. See Androgen insensitivity syndrome - Wikipedia.Tell me this, at the cellular level, do you think a person's sex changes after conception?
This is more a reflection of the gay/lesbian/trans people you chose / are capable of befriending, rather than a meaningful indictment of the community.The LGBT community started out as something worthwhile, but even my gay friends are pretty disgusted and disillusioned by it with good reason.
What does that mean? I don't understand.If you are used to parasitically leeching meaning off of the marginalized, then to stop would be seen as a loss.
you watched the videos?Going through puberty is irreversible (at least socially and psychologically speaking) and dangerous to trans people.
Your statement that it has no proven efficacy I will evaluate once you provide a link to the meta-studies.
I looked into you links and I found no link to the meta-studies, thus why I asked.
When you have many competing values, it becomes impossible to measure ‘the good’ empirically. Morality is not so simple to be reduced to science.Perhaps -- but what value could it have if it is not empirical? Everything may possible if not based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience, but likewise all of those same things may be impossible.
It is, for example, just possible that you have 125 billion dollars in bank accounts you don't know about. How do you think that will avail you?
Says the master of the universe? wow!This is more a reflection of the gay/lesbian/trans people you chose / are capable of befriending, rather than a meaningful indictment of the community.
That said, I do appreciate the honest bigotry over the veiled concern.