• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Stratigraphy, radiometric evidence, fossil evidence, and genetics.

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
The faith basis is well established in this thread by the colossal failure of any posted to prove the same nature in the past science uses.
I agree. You have never posted anything to support your claims about the way the past was. Don't know why you persist on living a fantasy.

That is what you claim, Jesus disagrees.
He disagrees with you.

Not by people who chose to reject it.
Not by anybody except delusional fantacists. You use your magic time machine to go back and verify it? Schooled you again.


The only record man has in history and Scripture of that early world is not popular belief, but an exclusive record.
You don't know much of anything do you. Didn't you go to school?
We all can observe you fail to support the same nature in the past belief that underpins origin sciences. Very clear to observe!
I observe your belief is in a gap.

Schooled you again.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Your bizarre same state past belief has no evidence. It is silly to mention how layers now form when talking about the past unless you first prove that a same nature existed. You failed.

This sums up your rejection of science based on a faith based scenario based on a literal interpretation of ancient scripture without provenance. By the way science does not prove anything, fortunately. Science falsifies theories and hypothesis based on objective verifiable evidence.

Yes, the objective verifiable evidence demonstrates there is only one way lamela can form based on direct observation. Simply if you can present a hypothesis based on your scenario that can be supported by science you would have an alternative way they could form. but so far you have only presented an unsupported bizarre assertion with no evidence.

Still waiting . . .
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
"Confused" is being too generous.

From: How Religious Fundamentalism Hijacks the Brain

How Religious Fundamentalism Hijacks the Brain
Fundamentalist ideologies act like mental parasites.

In moderation, religious and spiritual practices can be great for a person’s life and mental well-being. But religious fundamentalism—which refers to the belief in the absolute authority of a religious text or leaders—is almost never good for an individual. This is primarily because fundamentalism discourages any logical reasoning or scientific evidence that challenges its scripture, making it inherently maladaptive.

It is not accurate to call religious fundamentalism a disease, because that term refers to a pathology that physically attacks the biology of a system. But fundamentalist ideologies can be thought of as mental parasites. A parasite does not usually kill the host it inhabits, as it is critically dependent on it for survival. Instead, it feeds off it and changes its behavior in ways that benefit its own existence. By understanding how fundamentalist ideologies function and are represented in the brain using this analogy, we can begin to understand how to inoculate against them, and potentially, how to rehabilitate someone who has undergone ideological brainwashing—in other words, a reduction in one’s ability to think critically or independently.

How Religious Ideologies Spread

Similar to how organisms and their genes compete for survival in the environment and gene pool, ideas compete for survival inside brains, and in the pool of ideas that inhabit them. The famous evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has used this insightful analogy to explain how ideas spread and evolve over time. In his influential 1976 book, The Selfish Gene, he refers to ideas as “memes” (the mental analog of a gene), which he has defined as self-replicating units that spread throughout culture. We are all familiar with many types of memes, including the various customs, myths, and trends that have become part of human society.

As Dawkins explains, ideas spread through the behavior that they produce in their hosts, which is what enables them to be transmitted from one brain to another. For example, an ideology—such as a religion—that causes its inhabitants to practice its rituals and communicate its beliefs will be transmitted to others. Successful ideas are those that are best able to spread themselves, while those that fail to self-replicate go extinct. In this way, some religious ideologies persist while others fade into oblivion.

It is easy to see why religion quickly spread through culture once it emerged. When humans gained the cognitive capacity to reason and plan for the future, they became aware of their own mortality. The realization that oneself and all one’s loved ones will someday die is naturally terrifying, and this existential fear perfectly set the stage for anxiety-reducing ideas, like ones that offer a never-ending afterlife. But religions are complex ideas, and the psychological effects they have on minds go beyond just relieving anxiety.

Essentially, the brain is a biological computer, and an ideology is a set of coded instructions, or “cultural software,” that is running on the brain’s hardware. Esteemed philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett insightfully described how ideas can control minds when he said, “The haven all memes depend on reaching is the human mind, but a human mind is itself an artifact created when memes restructure a human brain in order to make it a better habitat for memes.” In this regard, it is often not the brain that controls the mind, but the memes that compose the mind that control the brain. This is especially the case when the meme is a religion.
 

dad

Undefeated
This sums up your rejection of science based on a faith based scenario based on a literal interpretation of ancient scripture without provenance. By the way science does not prove anything, fortunately. Science falsifies theories and hypothesis based on objective verifiable evidence.

Yes, the objective verifiable evidence demonstrates there is only one way lamela can form based on direct observation. Simply if you can present a hypothesis based on your scenario that can be supported by science you would have an alternative way they could form. but so far you have only presented an unsupported bizarre assertion with no evidence.

Still waiting . . .
Ah, repeated cut and paste responses...thought this looked familiar.

Lurkers, this poster was asked to post the claimed verifiable evidence and observations for a same nature on earth in the past. Instead we get cut and paste spam posts.
 

dad

Undefeated
For example, an ideology—such as a religion—that causes its inhabitants to practice its rituals and communicate its beliefs will be transmitted to others. .
Such is origin sciences ideas and propaganda and doctrines. Thanks for that.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
The scientific methodist method...pass gas instead of address the topic and do so with attitude. Whatever....
This is so sad. To see you crumble down to childish personal attacks. Not very Christian. Not something a person with real faith would have to do. It screams of weakness.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
Such is origin sciences ideas and propaganda and doctrines. Thanks for that.
But you cannot prove it. You just make things up. You just don't bother to follow some of the commandments. Bearing false witness is no barrier for you.

There are gaps within your gaps.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Ah, repeated cut and paste responses...thought this looked familiar.

Lurkers, this poster was asked to post the claimed verifiable evidence and observations for a same nature on earth in the past. Instead we get cut and paste spam posts.
dad, how many times do you need to be reminded that your own fear is obvious to the lurkers that you appeal to? You are afraid to even try to learn the basics of science. When you talk about a "fishbowl" you are in reality describing how your very self limited knowledge keeps you in a very ignorant little bowl swimming around with no one else to keep you company.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
Ah, repeated cut and paste responses...thought this looked familiar.

Lurkers, this poster was asked to post the claimed verifiable evidence and observations for a same nature on earth in the past. Instead we get cut and paste spam posts.
Lurkers, this poster will not and cannot post any evidence that what he says is correct. Never, never,, never, going to be able to fill in his gaps with any substance. He is forced to lie and make personal attacks. That is all he has in Never, Never Land.
 
Top