If men rarely farted, but women did it all the time, there would be such a social expectation.
That's nonsense, and completely ignorant of basic observation. Women and men both expell gas and waste at similar rates, and yet the social expectations of men and women with regards to expelling gas and using the restroom are WILDLY different. It's just absurd to claim that we determine these expectations by these kinds of statistics.
Then how do they develop?
See what I said below.
Actually we do. I’ve been called a black man many times.
That's a designation, not a social reference like a pronoun.
Also note how you said you have been called a "black MAN". Notice that second word? I'm willing to bet you have relatively rarely been called "a black", but I am fairly certain you are almost always referred to as "a black MAN" or even just "a MAN".
It's almost as if the gender category you belong to is referred to a lot more than your race when people refer to you. Who woulda thunk?
That’s because there are no racial pronouns.
And have you considered WHY that might be?
It's because, socially speaking, gender is a far more pervasive distinction than race. At the very least, currently.
But my point is; just as we don’t have expectations concerning race,
Yes, we do. They're just not as ingrained or pervasive. People do have associations and archetypes based on expectations of race. The main difference is that we are more willing to challenge and question those associations than we are to challenge and question gender.
we don’t need to have expectations concerning gender either; especially when those expectations have a history of sexism.
I agree. But those will always develop if you're defining people into social categories via their biology. As much as you want to divorce gender expectations from biological categorisations, that simply is never going to happen as long as we keep using gendered pronouns according to biological categories.
Literally all racial stereotypes and profiling. As I said, though, these are nowhere near as ubiquitous as gender, and society at large generally fights against them.
In my city they have a parade every year for men who like to wear dresses. I can only imagine the hostility ensuing in attempting to have a parade for men voting for Trump
We don't have a parade every year in my city for people who like baked potatoes, either. Does that mean that people who like baked potatoes are socially stigmatised more than gay people, because gay pride parades happen?
Do you seriously believe those "men wearing dresses" haven't experienced severe abuse? What's the absolute worst thing that has ever happened to a black person you know who voted for Trump as a direct result of their voting for Trump? Because I guarantee, whatever it is, I can trump it EASILY by referring to the life of almost any trans or non-gender confirming person I know.
If not behavior, what makes gender stereotypes biodimorphic?
Where have I mentioned stereotypes? I am talking about expectations and archetypes.
For example, women wearing dresses is biodimorphically related to biological women's associations with childbirth. That's not a stereotype, it's an expectation.
You don't know the truth. You are not in these people's heads.
If you want to live a lie, I have no problem with that as long as you keep it to yourself.
They aren't living a lie. They're being truthful.
But you have no right to demand I sign off on and become an active participant in your lie.
You're just being asked to respect the fact that they are in a particular category. That's it. Why can't you just grow up and show some basic common courtesy and respect?
If I choose to do that; that's my choice but you have no right to demand that of me.
People have the right to be treated with basic respect.
In the sense that they are both wrong concerning what they believe to be true? Yes!
Based on what? You have failed to make a single factual argument in support of the assertion that trans people's identities are false.
Yes! They believe something about themselves that is not true.
Except it is.
That’s why we have absurd responses like “a woman is a person who believe they are a woman” as an answer to what is a woman! How is this any less absurd than if I were to say a 12 year old is a person who believe they are 12?
Because age is not a socially defined category. Gender is. If you can't tell the difference between age and gender, that's your issue. Not theirs. You have had every chance to be educated on the subject, and I and many posters have graciously taken the time to explain it to you. Your failure in comprehension here cannot be blamed on them. It can only be blamed on you. Either you're incapable of learning this distinction, or you are unwilling.
The fact is, there has to be objective realities in place in order for you to be given the age label 12; the same goes for woman.
This has literally never been true for the entire history of social categorization. They have ALWAYS been subjectively defined depending on time and culture.
When you take away the objective realities associated with being a woman and make it completely subjective, you take away all meaning of what it means to be a woman and I find that unacceptable.
Then grow up. The world doesn't revolve around you and your limited understanding of it. There's a world outside of you.