• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Students Are Pushing Back Against Gender Ideology In Their Schools

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Because age is not a socially defined category. Gender is.
Actually age is as well; we have teenagers, adolescents, adults, these are socially defined categories.
This has literally never been true for the entire history of social categorization. They have ALWAYS been subjectively defined depending on time and culture.
Name a time and culture when society claimed men can have babies.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
When have I ever said men and women are the same? Throughout our entire debate I have EXPLICITLY been saying that social expectations and associations are wildly different.

If you're going to try one of these snide "gotcha" arguments, try basing them on things I actually say. Don't just make up garbage.
When I asked you what is a woman, you refused to give an objective difference. In your view, is the only difference between a man vs woman their thoughts? Or is it more than that.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
I wamt to make sure I have poster's and what they said lined uo correctly before I say this:
Are you the one who said or asked something about claiming to be a black man? Someone did failry recently but it's been just long ago enough that I've haven't found the post in question yet.
you are likely talking about someone else.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Name a time and culture when society claimed men can have babies.
I actually read about a culture where they did not believe men had any role in reproduction at all. It was a long time ago (I was in university), so don't ask. But they apparently did not believe there was any connection between sex (I mean the act of having sex) and pregnancy.

Just a little interesting trivia.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Because age is not a socially defined category.
Yes and no. An easy example is the concept of adolence. 13 years olds have always been 13 year olds, but in times past they were considered grown men and women. They sometimes even led kingdoms. But today we have come to accept a period of time where we transition from childhood to adulthood.
I can also use my life, where I have been put in multiple different generations and look young enough people tend to expect certain things from me and get confused amd surprised when acting my age, such as how my liking of Grunge and 80s Synthpop getting more confusion from people than anything else despite those genres being highly popular genres of the radio as I was growing up. But to a younger crowd I'm an old lady when I saw I'm from the Cold War amd remember it's later years.
Yeah, there is definitely a social construct behind age even if there is a chronological factor behind it.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Yes and no. An easy example is the concept of adolence. 13 years olds have always been 13 year olds, but in times past they were considered grown men and women. They sometimes even led kingdoms. But today we have come to accept a period of time where we transition from childhood to adulthood.
I can also use my life, where I have been put in multiple different generations and look young enough people tend to expect certain things from me and get confused amd surprised when acting my age, such as how my liking of Grunge and 80s Synthpop getting more confusion from people than anything else despite those genres being highly popular genres of the radio as I was growing up. But to a younger crowd I'm an old lady when I saw I'm from the Cold War amd remember it's later years.
Yeah, there is definitely a social construct behind age even if there is a chronological factor behind it.
There have even been some cultures that might have described someone who we would say is 13 as being 156, or older.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Yes and no. An easy example is the concept of adolence. 13 years olds have always been 13 year olds, but in times past they were considered grown men and women. They sometimes even led kingdoms. But today we have come to accept a period of time where we transition from childhood to adulthood.
I can also use my life, where I have been put in multiple different generations and look young enough people tend to expect certain things from me and get confused amd surprised when acting my age, such as how my liking of Grunge and 80s Synthpop getting more confusion from people than anything else despite those genres being highly popular genres of the radio as I was growing up. But to a younger crowd I'm an old lady when I saw I'm from the Cold War amd remember it's later years.
Yeah, there is definitely a social construct behind age even if there is a chronological factor behind it.
To be clear, I was referring to numerical age, not age of consent, etc.. The example being given was specifically someone claiming to be 12 years old.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Health care is not being banned for trans people. There are and always have been specific types of medical procedures that are banned for everybody.

No; it’s controversial in all countries, even this one. So let’s quit acting as if there is a consensus on this subject.

Health care for legitimate treatment of transgender individuals is being banned in some states, and we both know it, even though you choose to hide that knowledge behind a wall of obfuscation. The reasons for the bans are political, not medical, but usually the impetus for restrictions comes from medical professionals themselves, not political partisans engaged in a culture war. In authoritarian countries, of course, political bans of the sort under discussion are more common, and that seems to be the direction that the GOP is taking us in. Restrictions and bans on transgender care go hand in hand with forcing women to carry unwanted or dangerous pregnancies to term. Nobody is pretending that the care is noncontroversial politically. Quite the opposite. That is the reason why these laws are being imposed on targeted groups of people.

Define “special medical care”.

Before I respond, are these states banning care for Adults? Or only for children. If they are banning care for adults also, please list some states doing this.

Yes. You were talking about some states banning such care, I don’t know the states in question, nor whatever laws that were passed, so I can’t give their reasons for doing it. I was only suggesting a reason why they might be doing such a thing.

I don't really have time to continuing pursuing these questions, but I know that you have difficulty using search engines like Google. I think it's easy, but I've had lots of practice with the internet. Here is just one result that I found for you:

States That Have Restricted Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth in 2023


I can't vouch for the accuracy of everything it says, but it does contain a list of states (the usual suspects) and details on their actions.

Here is some information on the nature of gender-affirming care. Please don't ask me to keep doing homework assignments for you.

Get the Facts on Gender-Affirming Care

 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Thank you. That proves what I said.

In the U.S. Black people do get arrested and convicted at a much higher rate than white people. But I am still not convinced they commit more crime.
Is there any evidence that could convince you that they do? If so, what?
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Health care for legitimate treatment of transgender individuals is being banned in some states, and we both know it, even though you choose to hide that knowledge behind a wall of obfuscation. The reasons for the bans are political, not medical, but usually the impetus for restrictions comes from medical professionals themselves, not political partisans engaged in a culture war. In authoritarian countries, of course, political bans of the sort under discussion are more common, and that seems to be the direction that the GOP is taking us in. Restrictions and bans on transgender care go hand in hand with forcing women to carry unwanted or dangerous pregnancies to term. Nobody is pretending that the care is noncontroversial politically. Quite the opposite. That is the reason why these laws are being imposed on targeted groups of people.



I don't really have time to continuing pursuing these questions, but I know that you have difficulty using search engines like Google. I think it's easy, but I've had lots of practice with the internet. Here is just one result that I found for you:

States That Have Restricted Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth in 2023


I can't vouch for the accuracy of everything it says, but it does contain a list of states (the usual suspects) and details on their actions.

Here is some information on the nature of gender-affirming care. Please don't ask me to keep doing homework assignments for you.

Get the Facts on Gender-Affirming Care

I noticed the list of States you provided ban trans care (which includes surgery) for minors. A lot of people have no problem with adults receiving such care, but such care on children is where they draw the line. I know you don’t like it, and a lot of other people don’t like it, but a lot of people do agree with this
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
It's closer to 365 1/4, with leap years (and some more) beong necessary to correct for the inaccuracies of a 24 hour day.
My point is, everybody agrees on it, it is an objective measure for a year; we don't have people making up their own timescale for a year.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
No; everybody agrees on when leap years are.
Restating it doesn't make it true. Not only have there been active debates about changing leap years (and the already changed leap years) in Gregorian calendars, (even some fighting about how religious influence to keep the spring equinox and easter the same dates corrupted the long term accuracy) but also other calendars which would displace leap years alltogether.

My point is that attempting to get only hard line single definitions is worthless as it intentionally or unintentionally ignores nuance for brevity. Aka reductionism.
 
Top