Do I really have to explain something as basic as we have different expectations when it comes to men or women passing gas or using restrooms? You seriously have never encountered that?
In this case, how is a designation different from a social reference?
In the sense that we people call you "he" they are referring to you with association to a characteristic, not describing you in the same way that someone would when they refer to you as a "black man".
You said we don’t refer to people according to their race, I was just pointing out that we do.
No, we don't. We can DESCRIBE someone according to their race, but we don't refer to people exclusively via there race. There are no pronouns for black or white people.
Perhaps to you, but there are a lot of people who see race as far more important than gender.
I don't care. Society clearly has far more delineation between gender than between race. Those people would be deluded to disagree.
No, they're not always. People talk about identified racial characteristics all the time and are not always called bigots. It makes up a huge proportion of black stand up comedy.
Those people are condemned by society; the same should be for those who do it for gender.
Except they aren't. The idea that men should not wear dresses is, according to your standard, bigotry. But that bigotry is very, very widely accepted.
Are you speaking for all US cities? Or just the ones you are familiar with.
I'm speaking broadly. I don't care about your example of an exception. If you don't think gay or trans people face more abuse and discrimination than black Trump voters you are just objectively and obviously wrong.