SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Which government regulators? Where? Which big pharma? Where?The real problem is the money trail between big pharma and government regulators.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which government regulators? Where? Which big pharma? Where?The real problem is the money trail between big pharma and government regulators.
In the United States.Which government regulators? Where? Which big pharma? Where?
The problem there is that this was a global pandemic and most every country in the world besides the US has a completely different healthcare system because we all have universal healthcare, for the most part. The US is the outlier.In the United States.
It reminds me of an argument I heard back in theOn average, seatbelts save way more lives than they take.
While it was reasonable to think so in the early days, with the benefit of hindsight that no longer applies.The problem there is that this was a global pandemic
No, Fauci was at the epicenter of it all.The US is the outlier.
Do you claim it never was a global pandemic,While it was reasonable to think so in the early days, with the benefit of hindsight that no longer applies.
Can't deny that. - But there are far greater issues in the public schoolsThese teachers that do these things are in private religious schools too, remember. There was a Christian elementary school teacher and pastor who passed a background check but was arrested for having, and making, child pornography. This scourge of predators crosses all demographics. People who want to blame the public schools for what also happens in private schools need to be aware that private schools will not necessarily protect their children.
Trust in the "authorities" still plays a significant role in human behaviour. It takes some inner discipline to put the majority opinion aside for a bit and look at the facts objectively.Do you claim it never was a global pandemic,
or just that it no longer is?
OK.Trust in the "authorities" still plays a significant role in human behaviour. It takes some inner discipline to put the majority opinion aside for a bit and look at the facts objectively.
But the public schools have to accept whoever walks in, whereas parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools have to offer a variety of programs because of the diversity of the children coming in whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, if the public schools want to dismiss an unruly student, the family of that student can take the board to court, whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools legally have to put students of different backgrounds together whereas the private schools don't. Etc. Etc.Can't deny that. - But there are far greater issues in the public schools
But the public schools have to accept whoever walks in, whereas parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools have to offer a variety of programs because of the diversity of the children coming in whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, if the public schools want to dismiss an unruly student, the family of that student can take the board to court, whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools legally have to put students of different backgrounds together whereas the private schools don't. Etc. Etc.
So, what's the point? afraid of big boobs, are ya?Yes... public schools have lost their capacity to control right and wrong, whereas private and religious schools still can control.
that is why public schools have to deal with:
Controversial teacher with Z-cup prosthetic breasts returns to the classroom at new school
The Canadian teacher who sparked controversy after photos showed her in class wearing Z-size prosthetic breasts last year has landed a new teaching gig.nypost.com
Um no, it was a global pandemic.While it was reasonable to think so in the early days, with the benefit of hindsight that no longer applies.
Maybe in the US. But there's a great big world out there that some Americans don't seem to know exists.No, Fauci was at the epicenter of it all.
That doesn't seem to be an answer to the question.Trust in the "authorities" still plays a significant role in human behaviour. It takes some inner discipline to put the majority opinion aside for a bit and look at the facts objectively.
"Um no, it was a global pandemic"Um no, it was a global pandemic.
Maybe in the US. But there's a great big world out there that some Americans don't seem to know exists.
Anyway, Fauci is/was more than qualified to handle it.
Every epidemic & pandemic starts out highly localized,It became a global pandemic. At first, in the early days it wasn't.
Kinda weird that needs to be pointed out, isn't it?Every epidemic & pandemic starts out highly localized,
often with a "patient zero". Pandemics aren't global
until the disease spreads that far.
Perhaps that's to verbose.
I should'a said....
Duh!
Which is why some didn't take it serious at first. If it had been taken seriously it wouldn't have been as bad. But like we humans are prone to doing, we don't take many things seriously until its getting out of hand.. Global warming is a good example of that.Every epidemic & pandemic starts out highly localized,
often with a "patient zero". Pandemics aren't global
until the disease spreads that far.
Perhaps that's to verbose.
I should'a said....
Duh!
I know many who don't take Covid seriously....exceptWhich is why some didn't take it serious at first. If it had been taken seriously it wouldn't have been as bad. But like we humans are prone to doing, we don't take many things seriously until its getting out of hand.. Global warming is a good example of that.