• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Suppression of Free Speech on Covid

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
On average, seatbelts save way more lives than they take.
It reminds me of an argument I heard back in the
day that seatbelts kill because if one's car stalled
on railroad tracks, & a train is coming, & one
can't undo your seatbelt, then one dies.
Therefore seatbelts are dangerous.
It astonishly mimics the anti-vax arguments.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
These teachers that do these things are in private religious schools too, remember. There was a Christian elementary school teacher and pastor who passed a background check but was arrested for having, and making, child pornography. This scourge of predators crosses all demographics. People who want to blame the public schools for what also happens in private schools need to be aware that private schools will not necessarily protect their children.
Can't deny that. - But there are far greater issues in the public schools
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Do you claim it never was a global pandemic,
or just that it no longer is?
Trust in the "authorities" still plays a significant role in human behaviour. It takes some inner discipline to put the majority opinion aside for a bit and look at the facts objectively.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Can't deny that. - But there are far greater issues in the public schools
But the public schools have to accept whoever walks in, whereas parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools have to offer a variety of programs because of the diversity of the children coming in whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, if the public schools want to dismiss an unruly student, the family of that student can take the board to court, whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools legally have to put students of different backgrounds together whereas the private schools don't. Etc. Etc.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
But the public schools have to accept whoever walks in, whereas parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools have to offer a variety of programs because of the diversity of the children coming in whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, if the public schools want to dismiss an unruly student, the family of that student can take the board to court, whereas the parochial and charter schools don't. Also, the public schools legally have to put students of different backgrounds together whereas the private schools don't. Etc. Etc.

Yes... public schools have lost their capacity to control right and wrong, whereas private and religious schools still can control.

that is why public schools have to deal with:


On a side note... the Christian school we use to be part of, took in the public school rejects and got turned around. :) We believe it is the God factor!
 
Last edited:

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Yes... public schools have lost their capacity to control right and wrong, whereas private and religious schools still can control.

that is why public schools have to deal with:

So, what's the point? afraid of big boobs, are ya? :flushed:

And public schools do try and control right and wrong, so your stereotype is just that-- a stereotype. And racists LOVE private schools, and the proof of that is what quickly happen after Brown v Board of Education.

BTW, I am not accusing you of being racist, just for the record.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
While it was reasonable to think so in the early days, with the benefit of hindsight that no longer applies.
Um no, it was a global pandemic.
No, Fauci was at the epicenter of it all.
Maybe in the US. But there's a great big world out there that some Americans don't seem to know exists.

Anyway, Fauci is/was more than qualified to handle it.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Um no, it was a global pandemic.

Maybe in the US. But there's a great big world out there that some Americans don't seem to know exists.

Anyway, Fauci is/was more than qualified to handle it.
"Um no, it was a global pandemic"

It became a global pandemic. At first, in the early days it wasn't.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Every epidemic & pandemic starts out highly localized,
often with a "patient zero". Pandemics aren't global
until the disease spreads that far.

Perhaps that's to verbose.
I should'a said....
Duh!
Which is why some didn't take it serious at first. If it had been taken seriously it wouldn't have been as bad. But like we humans are prone to doing, we don't take many things seriously until its getting out of hand.. Global warming is a good example of that.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Which is why some didn't take it serious at first. If it had been taken seriously it wouldn't have been as bad. But like we humans are prone to doing, we don't take many things seriously until its getting out of hand.. Global warming is a good example of that.
I know many who don't take Covid seriously....except
as a nefarious government plot using a bogus disease
to take away our freedom.
One nurse I talked to said she had patients dying of
Covid, denying that it's a serious disease. Go figure.
 
Top