THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!All pregnancies pose health risks.
That is why it should be the decision of the woman whether or not she wants to take that risk!!!!!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!All pregnancies pose health risks.
Yup. I read this earlier today (source):How much more clear can it be that this is not a "pro-life" movement, this is about having total control over women.
They always have been able to make that decision by choosing to whether have sex and how. But no one can exercise a right by taking the life of another human. That includes a mother not being allowed to exercise her own reproduction rights by taking the life of another, including an unborn child.THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!
That is why it should be the decision of the woman whether or not she wants to take that risk!!!!!
Try turning off your own sex drive before you lecture anyone else about "choosing to whether have sex and how". That kind of ignorant, self-righteous attitude has always been the problem with men telling women what to do with their bodies.They always have been able to make that decision by choosing to whether have sex and how. But no one can exercise a right by taking the life of another human. That includes a mother not being allowed to exercise her own reproduction rights by taking the life of another, including an unborn child.
On the contrary, no one has the right to take over another persons body and use it for their own purposes. And that includes the Texas AG, and it includes an unborn child.They always have been able to make that decision by choosing to whether have sex and how. But no one can exercise a right by taking the life of another human. That includes a mother not being allowed to exercise her own reproduction rights by taking the life of another, including an unborn child.
It's depressing and telling that such a distinction would even be relevant. You'd think that not killing living, breathing women or inflicting needless suffering upon their person would be a bit more of a priority. Or respecting the professional judgement of doctors who go to medical school for several years over that of politicians with no relevant medical experience.I didn't share any medical opinion. I might be surprised if what you wrote was true, but the article states it isn't. According to the article the basis of her case was on the abnormality of the fetus, not on any threat to herself.
In my view , she has a right to go to another state where it's legal and free from pursuit and prosecution by Texas authorities and return to Texas if she desires and to live her life normally and free from harassment afterwards.A pregnant Texas mother of two got a court order allowing her to have a medically necessary abortion, but Texas state officials are threatening the judge, hospital, and doctors involved with prosecution, fines, and licensure removal. See story for details.
Texas woman with risky pregnancy granted abortion despite state ban
Kate Cox sued Texas to have an abortion after her foetus was diagnosed with a lethal condition.news.yahoo.com
That’s an undue burden in many situations that should not be imposed by government.In my view , she has a right to go to another state where it's legal and free from pursuit and prosecution by Texas authorities and return to Texas if she desires and to live her life normally and free from harassment afterwards.
It's strange to hear this coming from the left wing, when they do the same exact things albiet involving different issues.Just to note that this MAGA Taliban TX government is not alone. It part of a pattern of having the almighty state tell people what they can do with their bodies, what they can read in libraries, what teachers can teach, telling businesses that they have to advertise where the state tells them to, decide what votes to count, attacking LGBTQ+ people and so forth.
Missouri lawmakers propose allowing homicide charges for women who have abortions
On what planet is carrying a dead fetus not a problem? Because that’s what is happening. Does she have to be on her deathbed before she can get an abortion?All pregnancies pose health risks. The article never states that the ones she has experience rise to the level of being life threatening. It is YOU that should re-read the article. The case she brought to the court was based on the abnormality of the fetus and NOT on a claim that the pregnancy posed a grave threat to her own mortality.
This case has nothing to do with having sex, and how. It ia about unreasonable laws that put pregnant women at risk if their pregnancies develop problems, as in this case. There are otehr lawsuits against Texas for these laws that imply doctors and hospitals cold be charged with felonies.They always have been able to make that decision by choosing to whether have sex and how.
Unless it is the state of Texas, and laws cause the inadvertent deaths despite warnings.But no one can exercise a right by taking the life of another human.
This is not relevant to this case. And eyt no conern for the mothers with problematic pregnancies.That includes a mother not being allowed to exercise her own reproduction rights by taking the life of another, including an unborn child.
But zealous people with no medical knowledge take it upon themselves to overrule the experts. Despicable human beings.Clickbait. The law does provide an exception when the pregnancy puts the life of the mother at risk. The pregnancy involved in this case does NOT put the women's life in any greater danger than that of routine pregnancies.
She wants to have children. She is at risk of losing her uterus if she continues this pregnancy, so continuing this pregnancy is putting her ability to have children in the future at risk. This fetus has no chance to be healthy, much less survive to term. The mother might not even survive to term. Right now, she is too sick to travel out of state for an abortion.They always have been able to make that decision by choosing to whether have sex and how. But no one can exercise a right by taking the life of another human. That includes a mother not being allowed to exercise her own reproduction rights by taking the life of another, including an unborn child.
She's too sick to travel.In my view , she has a right to go to another state where it's legal and free from pursuit and prosecution by Texas authorities and return to Texas if she desires and to live her life normally and free from harassment afterwards.
Don't confuse me with facts and rational reasoning! My misogynistic prejudices must have their way!On the contrary, no one has the right to take over another persons body and use it for their own purposes. And that includes the Texas AG, and it includes an unborn child.
But btw, that you for proving my point that this is all about controlling women. It is important to punish those sluts who dare to have sex. Even if, as in this case, that women is married and had sex with her husband, and wants to have a child. It is still her fault, and she must be forced to suffer.
Apparently, this is going to be taken to full term. Only recourse is cesarean birth to which this thing will be over at full term anyways. At least she will be in a hospital surrounded by professionals.She's too sick to travel.
I find it hard to believe that the GOP strategists have not yet twigged that this is a vote loser and a voter motivator. People who are lethargic when it comes to voting will get out to vote.I hate to say this, but part of me does not want a solution to this before November of next year.
I think you're wrong about the motive being control
of women. It appears to be about willingness to risk
harm to, & even the life of women, in order to save
every fetus that could possibly survive.
Fanatical Christians view the mother's life & health
as quite subordinate to the fetus....even one genetically
damaged to the point of low survival odds, & even if
doomed to a short painful life.
This is a greater evil than mere control of women (IMO).
Sometimes they tell women to come back only when there are serious and deadly complications.On what planet is carrying a dead fetus not a problem? Because that’s what is happening. Does she have to be on her deathbed before she can get an abortion?