You missunderstand my point.
I was NOT talking about bacteria in that case, I was refering to the first living cell "protein" produced by bacteria. (which some evolutists claim it was origin of life)
Every single cell (protein) had one way out which is death "BYE BYE",where reproduce comes from since the first one is GONE ?
I don't think you know what a protein is, Godobeyer. There is no such thing as a "living protein." Proteins are not alive, they are long strings of molecules called amino acids, which form naturally, by simple chemistry.
A "first protein poduced by bacteria" doesn't make sense. Bacteria are already made from proteins, so how can they produce a first specimen of what they're already made of? The "first" protein appeared
before any life existed.
Do you think and believe that the universe can be the product of nothingness, IOW
Nothingness reacted with nothingness and the result was a thing which was then the
start for everything?
It's either it was always nothingness or it was always a thing, but what that thing is and
why it always exists is the simpler option to find answers for, but nothingness can never
be a rational option, yes it's hard to understand how then that thing existed and always
existing, but it's the only right option because nothingness means nothing.
I think you're trying to apply commensense and everyday observations to quantum mechanics and cosmology. In reality, absolutely "impossible" things are always going on. Things pop into and out of existence, time slows, speeds up, or both at the same time. It flows backwards, mass increases and diminishes, and most of it we can't seem to find, though we know it must be there.
And what's the alternative?
It's the creationists who claim the universe was created by magic, from nothing -- exactly what you seem to be skeptical of. At least scientists are looking for and testing evidence and various natural mechanisms.
lol I
I find an article relate to my point
All Species Evolved From Single Cell
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100513-science-evolution-darwin-single-ancestor/
do you agree that all species evolved from single cell ?
The article discusses evidence that all three domains of life arose from a single population or species of cells. It doesn't discuss the origin of these first cells.
Consider: What constitutes a cell? Is a drop of oil encased in a membrane a cell? Is it alive?
What if an amino acid or two gets caught in or engulfed by the oil blob? These are
parts of proteins. Is it alive yet? How complex does the mix have to get before it's considered a cell? What does it have to be able to do before it's considered alive ( the blobs already reproduce)?
It's all more complicated than a simple life -- non-life dichotomy. It's millions of molecules and molecular structures -- some with various lifelike features -- forming , breaking up, recombining; billions of times daily.
The "first" cell or 'first' life is an arbitrary point on a spectrum.
so one cell (independent cell) produce thousands of cells ?
... thousand of cells don't have reproduce system , so they gone/died in end , don't they ?
Do you understand how single celled organisms reproduce? They don't need to mate. They just grow to a certain size then split into two new cells, and on and on and on....
Do you understand exponential growth? any one single cell could produce millions in a single day.
failure (death) is the only way logically for one cell or thousand of cells don't have reproduce system.
But they do have a "reproductive system." See above.
Godobeyer, I get the impression you don't understand even the most basic principles of biology.