Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
Others have successfully met your challenge, as seen in the post below, yet you continue to deny this. I suspect it's because you don't like the responses.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Big Bang Theory is dead.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Others have successfully met your challenge, as seen in the post below, yet you continue to deny this. I suspect it's because you don't like the responses.
Notice you don’t explain how, as if you aren’t confident in your interpretation.
In the 21st century that means science. So you aren’t following this text.
We Never Know
No Slack
I 100% agree.
After 12 season the big bang theory died in 2019.
I still like watching the re-runs though
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The original Big Bang died in the 1960s.
Had to be rescued with the Big Hoax of the Big Fudge Factors of Inflation.
They are working like crazy to find a replacement since that too has been proven false.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Citation needed.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Look it up.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Your claim, your burden of proof.
In a debate when one runs away from his burden of proof that is no different from openly admitting that one was wrong.
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
You made the claim, so it is your responsibility to provide evidence to support it. Can you support your claim or not?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You make a claim prove it.
Have you met the challenge?
McBell
Unbound
Your challenge has been beaten so thoroughly not even necromancy can bring it back
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
Your deflection is noted.
I am not playing this game with you because I don't believe that you are being honest when you respond to others who disagree with you. You refused to accept @Sargonski's answers, as well as the answers from others who have successfully refuted your argument. Therefore, I have no reason to believe that you will accept mine. Based on your debating strategy, I predict that your response to me will be to accuse me of failing to meet your bogus challenge.
Look what up? You're not even giving anybody any search terms to work with.
And if someone tries to google excerpts from your post there isn't anything that comes up that even addresses your claim, let alone backs it up. I considered that maybe some of the phrases you had capitalized might be titles of actual circulating theories, but no luck there either (when I googled the "Big Hoax", apparently it's only popular usage so far has been as a title of a comic book, which I suspect is ironically appropriate)
And telling people who ask for citation to "look it up"', aside from being rude as hell, is kind of unfair considering that the only two people who have would be likely to have access to this information would be you and your proctologist (considering the probable place of origin for your claims).
Last edited:
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Here it shows how inflation was used to bail out the Big Bang
Cosmic inflation - Wikipedia
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL! Inflation is the "Big Bang". It was not used to bail it out at all.Here it shows how inflation was used to bail out the Big Bang
Cosmic inflation - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
When you have no understanding of an idea at all you can only shoot yourself in the foot.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Inflation was not part of the Big Bang in 1929.
Check your facts.
I'm no expert but I believe the Big bang occurred sometime prior to that.
yes, the original Big Bang description was elaborated by including thermodynamics, for example. Inflation was, and still is, speculative.The evidence still supports the BB scenario.
It wasn't to 'bail out' the BB. It was to *extend* the BB to earlier times and explain a few details (such as flatness). But the basics: that the universe is expanding from an initial dense, hot state is still valid and fully supported by the evidence. The age of approximately 13.7 billion years is also very solid.Here it shows how inflation was used to bail out the Big Bang
Cosmic inflation - Wikipedia
The bible also claims bats are birds.
and that rabbits chew the cud...