• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.

McBell

McBell

Unbound
SavedByTheLord said:
Yes I glanced through. These articles are written in certain way.

What about those dinosaur figurines?
What about the fact that there is no calendar with a count more than 6000 years.
Click to expand...
Glancing through them is not reading them.
The fact that you made numerous claims about the content of an article when the article said nothing of the sort shows that you either did not read the article or you did not understand what was written.

I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I assume you did not read them....

Now if you are going to insist you did read them, then you are admitting you can not understand what is written.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
McBell said:
Glancing through them is not reading them.
The fact that you made numerous claims about the content of an article when the article said nothing of the sort shows that you either did not read the article or you did not understand what was written.

I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I assume you did not read them....

Now if you are going to insist you did read them, then you are admitting you can not understand what is written.
Click to expand...
And so they do not challenge the Big Bang, the redshift theory and the exapansion of the universe.

This is the conclusion of one of the articles. Thus the author is questioning the Big Bang itself.

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Conclusive Argument​


Conclusion: A Timeless Universe​

Either the universe was created by a (big bang) singularity or it was not. If it was not created at some point in time, then it must be timeless/ageless. There is no third possibility.

There is no need to develop an alternate theory about the origin of the universe. If it did not suddenly pop into existence, then from our frame of reference it must have always been here. The ill-fated big bang theory was an attempt to answer why there is a universe. Questions of why, however, belong to the realm of philosophy rather than science.
 
McBell

McBell

Unbound
SavedByTheLord said:
And so they do not challenge the Big Bang, the redshift theory and the exapansion of the universe.

This is the conclusion of one of the articles. Thus the author is questioning the Big Bang itself.

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Conclusive Argument​


Conclusion: A Timeless Universe​

Either the universe was created by a (big bang) singularity or it was not. If it was not created at some point in time, then it must be timeless/ageless. There is no third possibility.

There is no need to develop an alternate theory about the origin of the universe. If it did not suddenly pop into existence, then from our frame of reference it must have always been here. The ill-fated big bang theory was an attempt to answer why there is a universe. Questions of why, however, belong to the realm of philosophy rather than science.
Click to expand...
Yes, the author is failing your challenge.
That you think the author is correct means you are failing your challenge.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
And so they do not challenge the Big Bang, the redshift theory and the exapansion of the universe.

This is the conclusion of one of the articles. Thus the author is questioning the Big Bang itself.

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Conclusive Argument​


Conclusion: A Timeless Universe​

Either the universe was created by a (big bang) singularity or it was not. If it was not created at some point in time, then it must be timeless/ageless. There is no third possibility.

There is no need to develop an alternate theory about the origin of the universe. If it did not suddenly pop into existence, then from our frame of reference it must have always been here. The ill-fated big bang theory was an attempt to answer why there is a universe. Questions of why, however, belong to the realm of philosophy rather than science.
Click to expand...
Again, So what? That is not how science is done.
 
Jimmy

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
Subduction Zone said:
I do extend the benefit of the doubt too much at times for my opponents that do not seem to even know how to do so themselves. And I do also point out that there is ample evidence for abiogenesis and none for the creationist point of view.
Click to expand...
Is that all you do here, is talk of no evidence for the supernatural? Any sane person knows that there isn’t any.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
King Phenomenon said:
Is that all you do here, is talk of no evidence for the supernatural? Any sane person knows that there isn’t any.
Click to expand...
No, you seem to be confused.

Of course you do not understand the burden of proof. When you take your ideas outside of the purely religious then you put a burden of proof upon yourself. I am not saying "God is impossible". I only say that there is no rational reason to believe in a God.

Do you understand the difference?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top