The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.

[Subduction Zone]

And in 2 threads.

Yes, you like to be wrong in multiple threads. We all can see that.

 

[Jimmy]

I have already proved God Almighty created all things and the Bible is true.

Not the kind of proof that any of these science lovers on here would accept imo

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have 2 irritable proofs that God cerated all things and that the Bible is the true word of God,
I will be posting more.

LOL!!! Irritable, yes, but only because they are soooooo silly. "Proofs"? Not even close.

I keep challenging you to bring them up again and discuss them. I pointed out the errors of one of them in the past but you ran away.

Are you still afraid?

 

[McBell]

I have 2 irritable proofs that God cerated all things and that the Bible is the true word of God,
I will be posting more.

You should start with the two you claim to have and as of yet produced

 

[SavedByTheLord]

LOL!!! Irritable, yes, but only because they are soooooo silly. "Proofs"? Not even close.

I keep challenging you to bring them up again and discuss them. I pointed out the errors of one of them in the past but you ran away.

Are you still afraid?

Can you refute them at all?

Here is simple challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give real evidence of anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

 

[Jimmy]

No, you seem to be confused.

Of course you do not understand the burden of proof. When you take your ideas outside of the purely religious then you put a burden of proof upon yourself. I am not saying "God is impossible". I only say that there is no rational reason to believe in a God.

Do you understand the difference?

Obviously there’s no rational reason. We all know that

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not the kind of proof that any of these science lovers on here would accept imo

Reality lovers.

I know, it sucks when one only has silly beliefs that one cannot even begin to justify.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Can you refute them at all?

Here is simple challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give real evidence of anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

That one has been refuted due to your own failures. And once again, you appear to be very afraid because you will not discuss your failures.

 

[Jimmy]

Reality lovers.

I know, it sucks when one only has silly beliefs that one cannot even begin to justify.

Keep believing what science feeds ya

 

[McBell]

Can you refute them at all?

Here is simple challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give real evidence of anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

give real evidence the Earth is only 6000 years old.
NO ASSUMPTION ALLOWED

 

[Subduction Zone]

Obviously there’s no rational reason. We all know that

Yes, for your beliefs there are no rational reasons to hold them.

And yet for some strange reason you do.

You appear to believe in God. And yet your version of God lies even more than the OP's version does. Why would you believe in a lying God?

 

[Jimmy]

Yes, for your beliefs there are no rational reasons to hold them.

And yet for some strange reason you do.

You appear to believe in God. And yet your version of God lies even more than the OP's version does. Why would you believe in a lying God?

There’s your famous lying god left field statement

 

[Subduction Zone]

Keep believing what science feeds ya

And there is the false claim again.

I know. it can be difficult when a person is scientifically illiterate. You cannot see that others can understand enough of science to see how it is correct. It is not a matter of being "fed".

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Yes, for your beliefs there are no rational reasons to hold them.

And yet for some strange reason you do.

You appear to believe in God. And yet your version of God lies even more than the OP's version does. Why would you believe in a lying God?

Maybe if found an inscription that said 5000 BC you could meet the challenge

 

[Subduction Zone]

There’s your famous lying god left field statement

How is that left field? You yourself claimed that your God was a liar. Did you forget how you did that?

 

[Jimmy]

And there is the false claim again.

I know. it can be difficult when a person is scientifically illiterate. You cannot see that others can understand enough of science to see how it is correct. It is not a matter of being "fed".

Keep tellin yourself that

 

[Subduction Zone]

Maybe if found an inscription that said 5000 BC you could meet the challenge

No, that would only prove a fraud aimed at the incredibly ignorant. Think about it.

We have countless examples. We have strata with millions of years of annual laminations. If you wanted to you could start to count them. We have radiometric dating. None of those dates are based upon "assumptions" at least not in the sense of an assumption that harms the conclusion.

You see if you refuse to define "assumption" then you allow your opponents to do so for you.

Meanwhile you never proved that the Bible was reliable. You are nowhere near earning a prize from the Templeton Foundation.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, that would only prove a fraud aimed at the incredibly ignorant. Think about it.

We have countless examples. We have strata with millions of years of annual laminations. If you wanted to you could start to count them. We have radiometric dating. None of those dates are based upon "assumptions" at least not in the sense of an assumption that harms the conclusion.

You see if you refuse to define "assumption" then you allow your opponents to do so for you.

Meanwhile you never proved that the Bible was reliable. You are nowhere near earning a prize from the Templeton Foundation.

I was only joking.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I was only joking.

I am not so sure about that. You appear to be the sort that would accept such a date.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I am not so sure about that. You appear to be the sort that would accept such a date.

whatever