themadhair
Well-Known Member
Lets put into perspective what your comment is implying.If you are a scientist, look into geographical caverns, and you will find that it holds some validity.
On the one hand we have you with a collection of manuscripts written by people who lack the modern knowledge we have today. This is through no fault of their own, but simply because they were not preceding a long line of people who investigated this.
On the other we have the edifice of modern geology. An edifice of collective research comprising millions of man-hours spanning over two centuries of rigours empirical inquiry. The fruits of this collective research is a detailed knowledge about our world and how it has changed over time under the actions of plate tectonic activity. We have been given the tools to see how the mighty Himalayas formed, the tools to understand how earthquakes and volcanoes are created, the tools to understand what oil is and how it is formed, the tools to understand such wonders of nature as Grand Canyon, Giants Causeway, Ayers Rock, etc. and the tools to understand the sheer magnitude in timescale involved in the shaping of our world.
And it your comment, you have the unadulterated arrogance to point to this branch of science and declare that you idea holds validity and, if only they thought to look in the geographical caverns, those scientists would understand.
Unbelievable.