Yes God created man. You can't explain how you get to a form of initial life for anything to be able to evolve, using evolution as your roadmap.
And you wonder why we become exasperated with you....
"evolution as a roadmap?" Population change explained by pre life chemistry?
We divide the vast field of human knowledge into categories, for convenience of study and utility. As you've been told a thousand times, abiogenesis is not evolution. One studies chemistry, the other studies the selection mechanisms that produce changes in populations. You know this, yet you continue to conflate the two just to obfuscate the issue.
Yes, everything's connected, but one doesn't need to study agriculture, botany or abiogenesis to know how bread is baked.
You say we "can't explain how you get to a form of initial life..."
Have you looked into the research? What do you know about the state of the art?
I'm guessing, from statements like this, not much.
We can observe the components of life automatically assembling themselves. Amino acids and nucleotides self assemble by simple chemistry. They polymerize into proteins and nucleic acids. Fatty acids in water form tissue bilayers -- plasma membranes -- then hollow, cell-like capsules. containing RNA, proteins, carbohydrates, &c.
These
proto-cells and
proto-bionts are little, self-replicating chemistry labs. As they intract with themselves and the environment, more effective metabolic and reproductive processes are selected for.
This is known chemistry. We can watch it happen. At no point is there either need of or evidence for a magical intercessor.
Granted, we have not yet observed the formation of complex, modern, endlessly reproducing
cells. The best we've found -- and not without a little manipulation to speed things up, it must be admitted -- are simple, delicate, inefficient proto-bionts that only replicate through maybe a dozen generations before dying off.
