fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
No idea, and neither does it matter. I have no idea how many Jews were in the world at that time. Because again, it doesn't matter in regards to the actual subject.so how much is a majority?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No idea, and neither does it matter. I have no idea how many Jews were in the world at that time. Because again, it doesn't matter in regards to the actual subject.so how much is a majority?
so quantify the number of jews who didn't mention jesus or his existence.
I think Storm covers this very well.If I'm ignorant, why do I so easily dominate you here in debate?
Curious question. You should probably think about it.
It's not my fault if you simply haven't done any research. You're making the incredible claim, you have the burden of proof. It is as simple as that. I don't have to prove something that is already accepted.Do you really have no idea how that looks, Blood -- the little game of trying to saddle the other guy with "the burden of proof"?
Really, you don't realize how that looks to those who take debate seriously?
You didn't read the OP. I wasn't set out to prove anything. I was asking why people believe in the Jesus myth. I was asking for their evidence for the idea. Now, you provided 6 points, that I offered rebuttals to. You haven't actually addressed any of those seriously.Since I have devastated all of your points with massive and irrefutable evidence, and actually proved to God Up Above that you come to this table with no evidence and puny argumentation, what more can I do?
HeeHee....
Which only shows that you actually have no knowledge on the subject, and are instead a troll. Thanks for letting us know.I once knew this little fighting gamecock. Oh, man... was he full of himself, strutting around the chickenyard all day, poking his chest way out.
Unfortunately, I'm a natural mimic. I can't help myself. If I hear a bird call, I answer back as best I can. If I see a man marching in front of a band, my legs start kicking up high, too.
So anyway, I started following the little gamecock around his pen, strutting high, poking out my chest. Of course, before very long, he noticed me. And he turned around and looked at me. And do you know what he said?
He said: I think you're being a little delusional, AmbiguousGuy.
(Don't mind me, everyone. I just like to tell stories sometimes.)
it is mind boggling to me you have all this knowledge about the potential of people's literacy but no idea how to turn this information into useable data.No idea, and neither does it matter. I have no idea how many Jews were in the world at that time. Because again, it doesn't matter in regards to the actual subject.
doppelgänger;2502149 said:It's a relatively close call as to whether there is evidence of a particular historical figure named "Jesus" that was the inspiration for all of what became Christianity. But even if there was, from the standpoint of historical methodology, there's almost nothing we can really say about this person, what he taught or what he did.
Again, it doesn't matter. Because literacy is not spread evenly amongst a population. There are other factors that must vary in as well. We can put the number between 3-5 million, possibly. But again, it doesn't matter. Because again, there are other factors.it is mind boggling to me you have all this knowledge about the potential of people's literacy but no idea how to turn this information into useable data.
ball park it.
say there were 120k jews that saw jesus.
What in the world does a pretty name have to do with anything?People just fail to grasp the beauty of the name Yeshu, because there have been more than 1000 of them in recorded history
People just fail to grasp the beauty of the name Yeshu, because there have been more than 1000 of them in recorded history
Clearly, you have very little knowledge on this subject, which is why you refuse to address the rebuttals I have given you, and why you continue to make so many elementary mistakes on your reasoning on this subject.
I'll answer your ridiculous question one more time. Why is there apparent plagiarism in the Gospels? Because the Gospel writers were using older sources in order to make their accounts. It is as simple as that.
Um... you don't. :sorry1: