Well, there was that time you burped the entire alphabet.so....you've never been impressed
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, there was that time you burped the entire alphabet.so....you've never been impressed
I notice that post didn't quote any of my statements about Trump.You, on the other hand, make posts supporting Trump and then get annoyed when people show that you are a Trump supporter.
Well, at least you're consistently succeeding at this.I have no need to impress you.
Do you question health warnings about cigarette smoking because some life-long non-smokers get lung cancer and some heavy smokers don't?They only two people I know personally (out of the hundreds of thousands who supposedly have gotten the virus) who have been quarantined for the virus wore their masks religiously, washed their hands incessantly, and even had their groceries delivered. Even though they 'felt bad' for a couple of weeks before they were tested, and they were quarantined at home for 2-3 weeks after, no one else in the household ever tested positive for the virus let alone come down with any symptoms....go figure.
It seemed to be very important to you in the previous several posts.The exact number isn't relevant but I appreciate the correction.
Because assigning guilt with such a huge, broad brush is so productive and useful.It seemed to be very important to you in the previous several posts.
Individualism and diversity are irrelevant to the point I am making about our collective culture and social systems. But if you need to imagine that you are innocent because you somehow stand apart from them, then I can't help that.
Why?For some reason I didn't get this.
I'm just asking a yes or no question.
Guilt is assigned where guilt is warranted. We ALL participate in the greed, ignorance, and human exploitation and suffering that our culture and social systems produce. And then we all pretend to ourselves that we are somehow innocent bystanders. That it's all someone else's doing. So I point this out, and just look at the attempts at minimizing, discrediting, and mitigating my clearly stated observation! Kinda proves the point, don't you think?Because assigning guilt with such a huge, broad brush is so productive and useful.
Why?
I am commenting on our collective culture and social systems. What about this, in your mind, warrants asking
"yes or no" questions about my 1/330,000,000 part in them?
I can say it proves my point about such ideas being very comparable to the guilt many Evangelicals and Catholics attach to human behaviors, to being human, and to just existing. The main difference is just the word "sin" is absent.Guilt is assigned where guilt is warranted. We ALL participate in the greed, ignorance, and human exploitation and suffering that our culture and social systems produce. And then we all pretend to ourselves that we are somehow innocent bystanders. That it's all someone else's doing. So I point this out, and just look at the attempts at minimizing, discrediting, and mitigating my clearly stated observation! Kinda proves the point, don't you think?
Well sure. No one ever wants to admit that they're complicit. But they are.I don't subscribe to this idea because it completely negates the individual. In fact, it doesn't even try. You are applying a single label to 329 million people. It isn't accurate and drastically over simplifies the narrative.
Are some more complicit than others?Well sure. No one ever wants to admit that they're complicit. But they are.
And then there's me. Thats some nasty debris for that hypothesis.Are some more complicit than others?
Are whites more complicit than blacks?
Men more than women?
Or are all equal?
Well sure. No one ever wants to admit that they're complicit. But they are.
thread material....Are some more complicit than others?
Are whites more complicit than blacks?
Men more than women?
Or are all equal?
Why did you pick one part of my reply to you and attack it? I distinctly said that this isn't about me. If you are only interested in a combative exchange, that's fine. But that isn't what I am here for.It seemed to be very important to you in the previous several posts.
Individualism and diversity are irrelevant to the point I am making about our collective culture and social systems. But if you need to imagine that you are innocent because you somehow stand apart from them, then I can't help that.
Does that really matter? Isn't everyone blaming everyone else a big part of the problem?Are some more complicit than others?
Are whites more complicit than blacks?
Men more than women?
Or are all equal?
It isn't about me, specifically, either, but this seems to be everyone's obsession, now.Why did you pick one part of my reply to you and attack it? I distinctly said that this isn't about me. If you are only interested in a combative exchange, that's fine. But that isn't what I am here for.
Yes. And it's what youre doing - blaming everyone.Does that really matter? Isn't everyone blaming everyone else a big part of the problem?
Everyone, not everyone else. That's the important difference.Yes. And it's what youre doing - blaming everyone.
It's a meaningless distinction as you're still holding everyone accountable by default. You judging everyone to be the same. Individual circumstances, contributions, actions, and such mean nothing. That's not a just or fair way of assigning blame or guilt.Everyone, not everyone else. That's the important difference.