Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, the question is, given the Hadith is Authentic, how do you explain the Hadith, in the light of the verses of the Quran?
How do you think next verse is related to 31:27According to hadiths, the verse 31:27 was after people asked about the Ruh (the Spirit), the verse in Surah Isra "They asked you about the Ruh..." was revealed. And people then said Quran is not a deep book that when asked about the Ruh, it didn't go into details. The verse 31:27 was in response to that so according to the hadith, it means there is no end to the knowledge you can derive from God's book. It was in response to saying Quran is not a deep book of enlightenment.
This is saying that there will be a Prophet on the Day of Resurrection and a another Law on the Day of Resurrection.He does not have a body, nor a form, nor a size, nor a substance. Rather, He is the creator of bodies, the former of forms, and the creator of sizes and substances. He is the Lord, Master, Creator, and Initiator of all things. And [I say that] Muhammad is His Servant, His Messenger, and the Seal of Prophets. There is no prophet after him until the Day of Resurrection. His Law (shari`a) is the Seal of Laws, and there is no Law after it until the Day of Resurrection.
All the hadiths except one didn't have that clause. But even the hadith you quoted, it's an implication of the term "seal of Prophets" to mean there is no Prophet till day of resurrection. This means, Seal of Prophets implies finality, and is not how Baha'allah interpreted (all Prophets are each other meaning).This is saying that there will be a Prophet on the Day of Resurrection and a another Law on the Day of Resurrection.
The Opening of this quote gives us a hint as to why Muhammad was the Seal of the Prophets. The Day of Resurrection has brought a new law and a new understanding. The Bab and Baha'u'llah are Manifestations of God, the 'Self of God' for all humanity.
This is the age of fulfillment. Muhammad sealed the age of Prophecy which was all about preparing us for this age.
Regards Tony
I would say the only Hadith that actually says, why Muhammad is called seal of Prophets, is the one from Imam Ali.All the hadiths except one didn't have that clause. But even the hadith you quoted, it's an implication of the term "seal of Prophets" to mean there is no Prophet till day of resurrection. This means, Seal of Prophets implies finality, and is not how Baha'allah interpreted (all Prophets are each other meaning).
With your sophistry way of language sure. Otherwise, to state it after has a purpose. It's an explanation.I would say the only Hadith that actually says, why Muhammad is called seal of Prophets, is the one from Imam Ali.
Any other Hadith, does not actually says, why Muhammad is called Seal of Prophets, unless one concludes for himself from the Hadith, or chooses to see that the Hadith implies finality.
By the way, the word for ended here, is "khatama" (verb form of the same word). The way Imams (a) talk is obviously they chose this word keeping in mind what Quran says.3ـ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى الاشْعَرِيُّ عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ الْبَرْقِيِّ عَنِ النَّضْرِ بْنِ سُوَيْدٍ عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ عِمْرَانَ الْحَلَبِيِّ عَنْ أَيُّوبَ بْنِ الْحُرِّ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ الله (عَلَيْهِ السَّلام) يَقُولُ إِنَّ الله عَزَّ ذِكْرُهُ خَتَمَ بِنَبِيِّكُمُ النَّبِيِّينَ فَلا نَبِيَّ بَعْدَهُ أَبَداً وَخَتَمَ بِكِتَابِكُمُ الْكُتُبَ فَلا كِتَابَ بَعْدَهُ أَبَداً وَأَنْزَلَ فِيهِ تِبْيَانَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَخَلْقَكُمْ وَخَلْقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالارْضِ وَنَبَأَ مَا قَبْلَكُمْ وَفَصْلَ مَا بَيْنَكُمْ وَخَبَرَ مَا بَعْدَكُمْ وَأَمْرَ الْجَنَّةِ وَالنَّارِ وَمَا أَنْتُمْ صَائِرُونَ إِلَيْهِ.
3. Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Ash’ari has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from al-Barqi from al-Nadr ibn Suwayd from Yahya ibn ‘Imran al-Halabi from Ayyub ibn al-Hurr who has said that he heard Abu ‘Abdallah (a.s.) say the following: "Allah, Majestic is his mention, ended with your prophet the (coming of) the prophets, thus, there will never come any prophet after him and with your book He ended the sending of (heavenly) books, thus, there will never come other heavenly books. In it (your book) He has placed clarifications for all things, such as your creation and the creation of the heavens and the earth. Therein is the news of the beings before you, the laws that help settle your disputes and the news of the beings that come into being after you, the news of the issues of Paradise and Fire and that to which you proceed.”
- Hadith #3 - The Imams are Similar to those before them and the Dislikeability of Calling them Prophets | Thaqalayn
You just accuse me of sophistry.With your sophistry way of language sure. Otherwise, to state it after has a purpose. It's an explanation.
There are many Hadithes that can be seen, Qaim is different from other Imams:He would have said there will be no Prophets from my successors, but a Prophet after my twelfth successor will come. Sophistry suits you. You can change any phrase to mean what you want, even if says the opposite.
Yes, Quran is not explicit. It has Mutishabihat. As you say, that's why Sunnah is needed.The answer is obvious. Which is why I think you have reading comprehension issues.
I'm talking about why the Sunnah is needed. I'm saying if Quran was explicit in everything, it would face similar things other books were faced with, major change in text. If it faced tahreef still, that the design is superfluous and my argument would not make sense.
I don't know how you can ask this question, given my explanation.
Yes, the Hadithes could have had a specifier. One could say the same thing about the Quran, that the verses could have had a specifier about the 12 Imams so, there wouldn't be any conflict in Islam about the legitimate Successors.The Qaim (a) is not only different to the Imams (a), he is different to all chosen ones, in that he is the universal end time Messenger that will establish justice one way or another.
However, this has nothing to do with the hadiths I quoted. The hadiths I quoted could've had a specifier "from my successors but after there will be a Prophet...". The hadiths I quoted are proof there is no Nabi after Mohammad (s).
Imam Ali does say this when explaining why it says “a peace be upon the family of Yaseen” instead of family of Mohammad. He talks how Satan caste sorcery regarding every revelation as well. It’s in the long dialogue between him and an atheist who had problems with the Quran.Is this what the Imam says?
Explain in what way Satan has been killed now. Otherwise there is no problem in that the day he been respited to is when Imam Mahdi rises. But Satan is not dead now so this hadith goes against your concept.Yes, Quran is not explicit. It has Mutishabihat. As you say, that's why Sunnah is needed.
As you also believe, the knowledge of the Imams are identical. As all of them were inspired by One and the same God.
I am saying this because I want to show you some Hadithes. But in every Hadith, I only say "the Imam". I don't say which of the Infallible Imams, because all of them is like one and the same Imam.
What does it mean, the Quranic expression يوم الوقت المعلوم (the appointed Time)?
This is a Hadith from the Imam:
قال : يوم الوقت المعلوم يوم ينفخ في الصور نفخة واحدة فيموت إبليس ما بين النفخة الاولى والثانية. الخبر.
قال : ويوم الوقت المعلوم يوم ينفخ في الصور نفخة واحدة ، فيموت إبليس ما بين النفخة الاولى والثانية. وأما « نون » فكان نهرا في الجنة أشد بياضا من الثلج وأحلى من العسل ، قال الله عزوجل له : كن مدادا ، فكان مدادا ، ثم أخذ شجرة فغرسها بيده ـ ثم قال : واليد : القوة ، وليس بحيث تذهب إليه المشبهة ـ ثم قال لها : كوني قلما ، ثم قال له : اكتب ، فقال : يا رب وما أكتب؟ قال : ماهو كائن إلى يوم القيامة ، ففعل ذلك ، ثم ختم عليه وقال : لا تنطقن
إلى يوم الوقت المعلوم. [١]
The Imam says, the Appointed Time is, when it will be blown in the Trumpet. That is the Day of Resurrection.
Let's look at another Hadith from the Imam, regarding the meaning of the "Appointed Time"
أخبرنا أحمد بن إدريس قال: حدثنا أحمد بن محمد، عن محمد بن يونس، عن رجل، عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام في قول الله تبارك وتعالى: فأنظرني إلى يوم يبعثون قال فإنك من المنظرين إلى يوم الوقت المعلوم، قال: - * * * يوم الوقت المعلوم هو يوم ظهور المهدي عليه السلام
This time the Imam says, "the Appointed" time is the Day of Manifestation of the Mahdi.
Now let's look at another Hadith about meaning of "Appointed Time"
الامام الرضا عليه السلام) " لا دين لمن لا ورع له، ولا إيمان لمن لا تقية له إن أكرمكم عند الله أعملكم بالتقية، فقيل له: يا ابن رسول الله إلى متى ؟ قال: إلى يوم الوقت المعلوم، وهو يوم خروج قائمنا
This time, the Imam says, "Appointed Time" is the Day our Qaim rises.
How is it that, in one Hadith says, "Appointed Time" is when the Trumpet is blown on the Resurrection Day, which is exactly what the Quran says, "Appointed Time" and "Blowing in Trumpet" and "Day of Resurrection" are all the same event as the Day of Judgement.
But in quite some other Hadithes, the Imam says, "Appointed time" or "Blowing in Trumpet" is the same as "Rise of The Qaim" or "Day of Manifestation of the Qaim"?
Which one is correct?
Now this is yet another Hadith from the Imam:
عن جابر عن أبي عبد الله في قول الله تعالى وَاللَّيْلِ إِذا يَغْشى
قال دولة إبليس إلى يوم القيامة وهو يوم قيام القائم
وَالنَّهارِ إِذا تَجَلَّى وهو القائم إذا قام
Here again Imam says, the Day of Resurrection is the Day the Qaim rises.
Does the Imam speak clearly, or Mutishabihat?
Let's look at another Hadith:
عيون أخبار الرضا (ع): أبي، عن علي، عن أبيه، عن حيون مولى الرضا، عن الرضا عليه السلام قال:
من رد متشابه القرآن إلى محكمه هدي إلى صراط مستقيم، ثم قال عليه السلام: إن في أخبارنا متشابها كمتشابه القرآن، ومحكما كمحكم القرآن، فردوا متشابهها إلى محكمها، ولا تتبعوا متشابهها دون محكمها فتضلوا.
The Imam says, when I give news about future, I also speak both in a clear language as well as Mutishabihat Just as the Quran is so. If you want to be guided, you must recognize when I speak Mutishabihat, and when I speak in a clear language. Then do not follow the Mutishabihat. Follow the Clear words to be guided.
So, the Question is, when the Imam is saying that Day of Resurrection is the same as Day of Rise of The Qaim, is this clear or Mutishabih?
Now here is another Hadith:
هل ينظرون إلا أن يأتيهم الله في ظلل من الغمام والملائكة وقضي الامر وإلى الله ترجع الامور)] (البقرة - 210). أن المهدي عليه السلام يأتي العراق في سبع قباب من نور [1466 - (الامام الباقر عليه السلام) " ينزل في سبع قباب من نور، لا يعلم في أيها هو حين ينزل في ظهر الكوفة فهذا حين ينزل "]
This is about the verse of Quran 2:210, which is about the Day of Judgement when Humanity meets God. The verse says "are they but waiting for God to come down in the clouds...", the Imam says this means "the Mahdi comes to Iraq"
And yet, here is another Hadith:
روى الفضل قال: سمعت أبي عبد اللّه محمد عليه السلام يقول:
إذا قام المهدي عليه السلام أشرقت الأرض بأنوارها، و استغنى العباد عن ضوء الشمس
The Hadith says, when the Mahdi Rises, the earth shall shine with His light, whereas the Quran says, the earth shall shine with the light of Her Lord.
Which one is it? The earth shall shine with the light of the Mahdi or with the light of her Lord?
Don't get me wrong I don't want to tell you there is guidance in these Hadithes for everyone. Maybe there is maybe there isn't. Who am i to judge. I just want to show you how confusing and contradictory they appear to be. I mean how can someone even trust any of the Hadithes when everyone of them says a conflicting thing?
I suppose they just choose the ones they like, and reject the ones they don't like, saying these Hadithes that I don't like, must be fake Hadithes, yes?
@Link
Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow to Allah (in Islam)."
Quran 2:136