gnostic
The Lost One
The proper names for the Big Bounce is either the cyclic model or the oscillatory universe.al-amiyr said:I am fully aware of everything that you have raised in the article but you have no knowledge about the Qur'aan Cosmological Model and how deep it goes. For example when you mention the Bounce the Qur'aan Cosmological Model already mentions the exact word Bounce (Tafrah) with its mathematical delineation.
There are many variants of the cyclic model. Each one has been discarded, because it is based purely on conjectures or speculations of how the universe would end. There are no evidences to support any of the scenario, I doubt there are any evidence to support your Qur'an Cosmological Model.
All current evidences showed that the expansion of the universe is not slowing down or reversing (reversing in the case for the Big Crunch or the cyclic/Big Bounce).
If anything, the evidences confirmed that the rate of expansion is actually accelerating.
Your Qur'an Cosmological Model is nothing more than conjecture or unverifiable hypothesis. If you have evidences, then submit your proposition (eg. papers, reports) - along with any evidence or mathematical proof(s) - before peer-review for other scientists (astrophysicists, astronomers, cosmologists) to examine your hypothesis and findings.
Without being review by scientists (like the astrophysicists) or other part of the scientific community, your claim is unfounded.
BTW, Islamic scholars are hardly qualified scientists. You have to do better than Shaykh Ahmad Deedat, who has no background in science, so it doesn't matter if he was astonished by those obscure verses.
Last edited: