YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Pretty small potatoes in the grand scheme of things....Mauritania did
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Pretty small potatoes in the grand scheme of things....Mauritania did
If Qur'an was given in this time (where slavery was not an global issue) it wouldn't be mentioned at all, since in the time Qur'an was given had slavery as huge issue around the globe it had to deal with it in moral ways.
Then why did it take Western colonial influence in the Middle East to put said outlawing of slavery into practice in actual lawmaking? Why were there no pro-abolition movements in the Muslim world prior to this?
He's grossly over-simplifying it, but the general "fight" against slavery was indeed headed initially by European powers. However, in the interest of fairness, that was only after they've spent the past couple of centuries making a mint on the backs of slave labour.whaaaaaaaat? Colonialism stopped slavery? Did you just actually type that? Wow, there's desperate and then there's this.
whaaaaaaaat? Colonialism stopped slavery? Did you just actually type that? Wow, there's desperate and then there's this.
He's grossly over-simplifying it, but the general "fight" against slavery was indeed headed initially by European powers. However, in the interest of fairness, that was only after they've spent the past couple of centuries making a mint on the backs of slave labour.
He's grossly over-simplifying it, but the general "fight" against slavery was indeed headed initially by European powers. However, in the interest of fairness, that was only after they've spent the past couple of centuries making a mint on the backs of slave labour.
I said "colonial influence in the Middle East outlawed slavery". There will always be a criminal element that will engage in it regardless. To be more specific, by "Middle East" I mean the territories of the former Ottoman Empire.
That's exactly my point, slavery is included in the holy books because slavery was accepted at the time they were written.
If these books were inspired by an eternal supreme moral being, there would be one statement and one statement only...
"SLAVERY IS WRONG, CUT IT OUT!"
- God
God wouldn't look down and say "Well, humans enslaving other humans is about the worst thing you can do morally...but since the humans of this time seem to be into it, I'll allow it in My Morality Book that I'm about to write, so I won't tip the apple cart" Can you imagine the most Moral Being in the Universe allowing for slavery at any time, no matter what?
Is that so? So the British enforcing an absolute ban of the slave-trade was, what, superfluous?No, the fight against slavery was never led by europeans. It was led by those slaves who decided to stand up for themselves, through political or violent means.
I think 0ne means emancipating all the slaves in Muhammad's time would have caused more problems than it solved - problems to do with where would these newly freed people live? What jobs would they have? Who would pay them? etc
Of course it fails to address the fact that if they had wanted to. The Muslims could have focussed their efforts on social reform, building new homes in anticipation of the whole pool of new free men, women & children who were about to become full citizens of whichever city they lived in. But no, they chose to subjugate & forcefully convert Arabs including the city of Ta'if, then to spread Islam by invading other powers instead.
Priorities...
Islam had outlawed slavery over 1400 years ago.
Show me a single, unequivocal verse in the quran which states Muslims should go and purchase slaves or treat people badly due to their skin colour or nationality? If you can not, this so called discussion stops here.
No, the fight against slavery was never led by europeans. It was led by those slaves who decided to stand up for themselves, through political or violent means.
Do you think your civilized society is free from slavery today?
Yes or no
Islam had outlawed slavery over 1400 years ago. Show me a single, unequivocal verse in the quran which states Muslims should go and purchase slaves or treat people badly due to their skin colour or nationality? If you can not, this so called discussion stops here.
slavery was as normal to Muhammad as the sand of the desert.
It's illegal here. When human trafficking victims are found we treat them humanely, or try to. When human traffickers (aka modern slavers) are caught, they're punished. I don't think we're free of it, but criminal elements will act without regard for the law.
Muhammad had slaves. That's not enough?
So he freed them...good for him. But he had them to begin with. Should we pat him on the back?
The most notable of Muhammad's slaves were: Safiyya bint Huyayy, whom he freed and married; Maria al-Qibtiyya, given to Muhammad by a Sassanid official, whom he freed and who may have become his wife;[45] Sirin, Maria's sister, whom he freed and married to the poet Hassan ibn Thabit[46] and Zayd ibn Harithah, whom Muhammad freed and adopted as a son.[47]
All such victories against the disbelievers and only few slaves,
Once they convert to Islam, they can be freed.What's a few human slaves between friends.
Once they convert to Islam, they can be freed.
Once they convert to Islam, they can be freed.