Revelations still tells us how Jesus will come back and it’s very clear.
Not sure what your point about names has to do with it.
You have gotten yourself tangled up with how Baha'i view the Bible and the NT and how you, I assume, a Christian views them.
Obviously, you view them very differently. I personally don't agree with some of the things that either side believes.
They interpret Revelation very different than Christians. Since their prophet had a different name, names becomes very important. They believe their prophet is the return of "Christ"... or the Messiah. And that in Revelation he will come with a new name. For me, that's their strongest claim.
That simply means Jesus is going back to Heaven until His return.
I think this stuff that they will see him no more is very weak. I have never seen that claimed by any of the main Baha'i leaders. It very possibly could have been invented by TB.
But why would a Baha'i play the "literal" game with the Bible and the NT when they don't take them literally? They go out of their way to find some symbolic interpretation on most all verses. But if they want to play that game then in Matthew it says...
4 Jesus answered: “Watch out that no one deceives you. 5 For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah,’ and will deceive many. 6 You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. 7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of birth pains...
22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. 23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you ahead of time.
26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
I don't know how Baha'i will try and interpret those verses, but to me it sure sounds like as long as there are wars, this Son of Man person will not come yet.
So, who is going to win that battle of throwing verses at each other? No one, because it's too easy to find verses that contradict what the other person throws out there.
That is because Christ has come back 3 times since, just as the Bible has told us will happen.
The only way we can see this has happened is to know that when Christ returns, it is not with the name Jesus.
I can hand on heart advise that Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah were Manifestations of God, as Jesus was, they too were Annointed.
This is based on a very weak Baha'i interpretation of some verses in Revelation. I say they are weak, because they are very much taken out of context. One of them is that they claim the "Two Witnesses" are Muhammad and Ali. The other is the "Three Woes" that they claim are Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah.
I've argued with Baha'is here for years about Revelation. I think it is clear, the main character is this "Lamb" or the "Lamb that was slain". They don't even try to make Baha'u'llah the Lamb. The best they come up with is to say his forerunner the Bab was the "Lamb that was slain" because he was shot by a firing squad. But, to me, the "Lamb" sure sounds like Jesus.
The key here though, not the flesh, but the Holy Spirit reality of Jesus.
The key here is that Baha'is can't have Jesus being the one that comes back. His body has to be dead and gone and the "flesh" mean nothing. So much so that they say that Jesus did not physically come back to life, but that the resurrection was not a physical resurrection but only spiritual. That the spirit of Jesus rose and his body rotted away.
Actually no more is a present term.
If Jesus said no more ever then you would have a point but he didn’t.
If I jump behind a wall and say you see me no more does that mean forever? No it just means until I come out from behind the wall.
And besides, Revelations specifically tells us Jesus will come back.
Yes, for TB and now Tony, it has to be strictly literal. He's gone and never, ever coming back. But in the Gospel of John, not long after those verses about him never coming back, he comes back. In the Gospels it has Jesus eating with them, talking with them and having one of them touch his wounds. And Jesus says that he is not a ghost but has flesh and bone.
If we want to take verses literal, then the Baha'is lose on this one. Plus, in Acts it says that Jesus showed himself to be alive by many proofs.
Now as far as being a more practical religion than Christianity, and a religion that fits modern times much better, the Baha'i Faith is worth looking into. But where they shoot themselves in the foot is when they try and reconcile all the major religions as being one and from one God.
How they gonna prove that? All the religions are different. And Christianity is very different than all of them. To make Christianity fit into their beliefs they, not only have to do away with a physical resurrection but also the whole concept of "salvation". Christians needs sin, Satan, Adam's fall, hell, demons and false religions and false gods. None of those things that Christianity believes in are supported by Baha'i beliefs.
In Christianity, Jesus has to be the one and only way. For Baha'is, Jesus has to be only one of the many ways. The two religions are very different. But the Baha'i Faith has an interpretation of the Bible and the NT that, for them, makes it all fit together. And they can make all the major religions fit into their beliefs. Which I think is a good thing.... if it's true. And they, of course, think it is.