I'm all the way back on p.2.
Actually, I made it up to p.7 then decided to come back to p.2 and respond to this:
let me tell you something, christians say that the Jesus is the god, so they worship the jesus while Muslims and jews said that he's not a god, and we don't worship him, so if the jesus is a god really that means that both muslims and jews are wrong and so islam and judhism and if not that means christianity is a false a religion, so religion really are different ways of seeking a god but only one of them which will guide you to the real god who is the creator of that universe, do u get my point
First point, perhaps trivial, is some Christians do not believe Jesus is to be worshipped. Personally, I think it is blasphemous.
Secondly, and related to that, is I think we do a disservice to faith in general to pigeon-hole (or contain) believers into belief systems that are either easily stereotyped or are, for whatever reason, not allowed to progress. When we remain rigid like this, we can, rather easily, put the religion before the experience of God. It is not only religions that do this sort of thing, but I'll stick to that for this forum.
Also if we remain rigid, we can get caught up in ultimatums or beliefs that appear to set up God or 'path to God' as contradictory, where there is none.
Like say we desire to go to Paris, France. That is the destination. I am coming from U.S., another from Norway, and yet another from Egypt. The "true" destination is Paris. So, we might then ask, what is the "right" way to get there? For me, it could be "head east." For the Norwegian, it may be "head south." And for the Egpytian, it may be "head north." But then the rigid thinking Norwegian gets word of the Egyptian's plan for arriving at the "true" place and says, you are going the wrong way. The instructions given to us say "head south." You think "head north" and you are wrong. For, it would be argued, it can't be both north and south, as that is opposite. They cannot both be right.
When in fact, they can be. For one could go in opposite direction of where they are heading, and still find Paris. Might take longer, but it is important to realize (I think)
there is another way.
Like the Paris example, the "path to God," assumes, for some, that God is not anywhere near the path.
I say God is within. Unable to be missed or lost (truly). Plausible that God could be denied. Of made to seem like God is hidden. For sure in my night dreams, I seem very adept at hiding God from my (inner) sight. While convinced I am still in a physical body and, for most part, physical laws do apply.
As long as the path to God is perceived as outward and that outward changes must occur to be "righteous on the path," the reality of God's closeness will be denied. Likewise, when perceiving brothers and sisters as distinct and separate, the perceived outer path will appear to have contradictions, as if there is no way around
that.
And yet, there is still (another) way.