Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
OK, but they don't do that.not silly, i meant illogical to worship cow surly it's not thecreator of the universe, this is whati meant
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OK, but they don't do that.not silly, i meant illogical to worship cow surly it's not thecreator of the universe, this is whati meant
It is always possible that no religion is right, they could all be wrong, every single one.
Maybe the true religion will be started after we dies, as the rest of the religions we have are only a few thousand years old or less, everbody before that time would have had no right religion to follow, perhaps we are still waiting.
I just feel that if God or Gods did send one right religion, there would be no debate, every human who is inclined to faith would know it when they seen it.
Ive seen such devoted followers of all faiths, if there is one right path, God is not very good at communicating it to the World.
You're getting very close to breaking rule 8, sweetie.unfortunately there will be no chance after death, the test will be ended by our death,
thegodhas only one religion, the god had sent prophets to teach the people the right path, after certain period, the people distort the books, and mix their words by the words of the god, so that thegod sent another prophet, till he sent moses to israellians, then they distort the torah so he sent the jesus to recorrect theirfaith, then the gospel is also distorted and the people begin to worship the jesus himself, so that the god sent mohamed, so it'sone religion but the people distort all except one
OK, but they don't do that.
:no:, there is only one religion beneficial to it's followers, it's islam, surly you will reply how, look to the muslims community how it's in the tail of nations? i'm totally agreed with you about that, but let's see deeply are really muslims acting as right muslims like our prophet and his first followers? far away we are, this is the reason that we left the islam's teaching behind our backs and take others teachingto make it as our guidance, this is the reasion, if we return back to our religion we will back the ideal community in every field as we were
Yes. And RF is an absolutely wonderful place to clear up such misunderstandings.so, i was mistaken
unfortunately there will be no chance after death, the test will be ended by our death,
thegodhas only one religion, the god had sent prophets to teach the people the right path, after certain period, the people distort the books, and mix their words by the words of the god, so that thegod sent another prophet, till he sent moses to israellians, then they distort the torah so he sent the jesus to recorrect theirfaith, then the gospel is also distorted and the people begin to worship the jesus himself, so that the god sent mohamed, so it'sone religion but the people distort all except one
Does the book of Mormon, the holy piby of the Rastafarian faith, and scriptures from the east fall within your faiths canon of literature?
ie what books are accepted as true, or is it all?
While the scriptures of a number of very old religions are recognized as scriptural, they are no longer considered accurate or reliable enough to provide serious guidance because they've been so altered and changed over the millenia.
The Jewish scriptures are about the oldest we still recognize as useful, but even the Christian scripture, while very useful, have been tampered with at least a bit (as demonstrated by the fact that many if not most Christian churches now reject and omit the end of the Book of Mark as spurious).
The Qur'an and the Baha'i scriptures are fully accurate, the Baha'i scriptures in particular as we have the original manuscript--vetted and/or signed by its author--for all 200 volumes of our scripture!
The Book of Mormon and the others you mention aren't scripture, nor do we use them (or even refer to them) as our own scriptures are quite explicit in stating no other present-day work is legitimate (nor can anything valid appear for centuries to come).
Peace,
Bruce
Are you sure about that?unfortunately there will be no chance after death, the test will be ended by our death,
Hmmm... I look around and see lots of religions...thegodhas only one religion,
What about Buddha? What about Hinduism? You forgot to mention those...the god had sent prophets to teach the people the right path, after certain period, the people distort the books, and mix their words by the words of the god, so that thegod sent another prophet, till he sent moses to israellians, then they distort the torah so he sent the jesus to recorrect theirfaith, then the gospel is also distorted and the people begin to worship the jesus himself, so that the god sent mohamed, so it'sone religion but the people distort all except one
thegodhas only one religion, the god had sent prophets to teach the people the right path, after certain period, the people distort the books, and mix their words by the words of the god, so that thegod sent another prophet, till he sent moses to israellians, then they distort the torah so he sent the jesus to recorrect theirfaith, then the gospel is also distorted and the people begin to worship the jesus himself, so that the god sent mohamed, so it'sone religion but the people distort all except one
i know that but i'm not convinced to have a symbol for the god, anyway i'll remove it
Friend islam,
Repeating the post once more as unless you are responding to this it is clear about your intention.
Have no idea as to where the seed of the idea that there is only ONE right religion came fro but do understand that the object is to reach to a place and one may take any path as long as the path is reached. There is no race that one gets the prize and others do not as ETERNITY or TIMELESS has to time to measure/compare such aspects.
Kindly remember that the objective is to reach the place and so every way is right and most this way or that way everyone reaches.
Love & rgds
its just that i have had these discussions before and I have heard it all
I've never found one contradiction or error that is legitimate in disproving the bible is the authentic word of God. Never.
If i asked you the same question, how would you answer? Im pretty sure you would not give up Islam If I could prove the bible is authentic.
Are you sure about that?
Hmmm... I look around and see lots of religions...
What about Buddha? What about Hinduism? You forgot to mention those...
why do you say that you can't learn something from the holy books?, do you read them all? how about if there are some others who learns from them?First, I believe the books have tendency to distort the message. Not to the point of, there is nothing there from which we can learn, but more so in the way that written word is not as direct or accurate as Inner Word. Temptation runs high to add to it or take something away from Inner Word. This doesn't make it bad or wrong, but just something to be aware of.
Second, I don't believe God advocates for a singular theology. And evidence we have of diverse theologies would for sure seem to suggest otherwise. Furthermore, there are faiths, like Bahai, which would uphold Islam. Thus, plausible to say both Islam and Bahai are theologies that advocate proper worship of God. Moreover, I do believe God, via divine revelation (messages) advocates for universal experience which can be shared without human preconditions or relying on external means. I think this is critical to understanding revelation, but is side point to this discussion.
Third, and main reason I wanted to write this post, are you suggesting that all religions except Islam are distorted by humans? If so, of the many questions I might ask, I am curious why there are (at least) 3 primary sects within Muslim world, if there is no distortion occurring?
Peace be with you.
yes, i'm sure about that, i don'tconsider those as a religion, buddha isn't a god or a creator he's a person like me and you,
The cow isn't even a symbol for God. The cow represents selflessness. She does not ask for anything, yet gives so much. Even without eating cows, the Vedic people found many uses for cows back in the day. Even their urine and dung was put to good use.
Not only that, but not all Hindu paths use symbols for God. Advaita Vedanta, for example, doesn't usually use symbols or murthis, and I'm pretty sure there's a few schools which outright deny them.
indeed i spoke before to 2 hindus who said that they consider the cow as a god, so that they respect it too much, and don't eat it, now you said that it's not even a symbol of the god,
i'm totally agree with you about the benefits of cows, but also we can find the same at sheep,
i just want to know what attract you in hindu? really i feel curious to know
Hinduism is as diverse as humanity itself. Unlike the Abrahamic religions, Hinduism cannot easily be defined. In fact, there's a lot of debate as to what it even defines.
Perhaps, but I don't think sheep existed on the Indian subcontinent during Vedic times, so those people wouldn't have known that.
I actually don't have any special reverence for the cow, but that's just me.
I read the Upanishads, and found in them a philosophy and religion that I had essentially already believed and found on my own. The philosophies are astounding, even now when I reread them, and the wisdom that the Sages have taught is just incredible. Sure, there are factual errors here and there, but that's to be expected. Essentially, I consider the Upanishads to be the bedrock of modern Hinduism, from which all subsequent literature comes from. (They are part of the Vedas.)
The religion is also so vast that I find something new every time I look for something. It's an ongoing journey rather than just living out the same daily routine and hoping it pays off in the afterlife. I'm actually on an active search for God, whom the Sages have declared is One referred to by many names, and imagined with many forms.
I can also be specific in my beliefs in terms of which Sages I predominantly follow. Sri Ramakrishna, Paramahamsa Yogananda, and Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami. All three of these Sages teach different schools, and lived in different times. Ramakrishna lived in the 19th century; Yogananda lived in both the 19th and 20th centuries (he left his physical body in the 1950s, I believe); Subramuniyaswami lived in the 20th century, and died a few years ago. If you want to know more about my beliefs, I direct you to them. I don't agree with everything they teach, but for the most part, these Sages have been the most influential thus far.