The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

[Laniakea]

Apparently, my point went well over your head. There were five lives lost, if my memory is correct, but don't those who suffered injuries matter to you even one iota?

Not on January 6th as you claimed, and not at the hands of protesters.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And yet it's ok for a black man to shoot an unarmed white woman who wasn't seen doing anything violent at all.

What are you nattering about now?

 

[metis]

Not on January 6th as you claimed, and not at the hands of protesters.

Now you're being dishonest as I didn't say they died on the 6th.

 

[Laniakea]

What are you nattering about now?

Is that supposed to be one of your "polite" posts?

Learn to check what the post was responding to and you'd know the answer to your question. Ask politely, and you'd get an even better response.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is that supposed to be one of your "polite" posts?

Learn to check what the post was responding to and you'd know the answer to your question. Ask politely, and you'd get an even better response.

You rather rudely responded to me with an off topic post. You reap what you sow.

 

[Laniakea]

Now you're being dishonest as I didn't say they died on the 6th.

I was originally discussion this with someone else when you decided to take over: The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

 

[Laniakea]

You rather rudely responded to me with an off topic post. You reap what you sow.

As do you.

 

[metis]

I was originally discussion this with someone else when you decided to take over: The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

What it originally was is irrelevant to our interaction, and it seems that cause & effect escapes you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

How many lives (that you care about) were actually lost on Jan. 6th?

This is an improperly asked question. You should have asked "How many lives were lost due to Jan. 6th". Putting a one day limit on such an event can be misleading.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As do you.

And yet you cannot defend your nattering.

Please try to make actual points instead of making futile complaints about an event that you refuse to understand.

 

[Laniakea]

This is an improperly asked question. You should have asked "How many lives were lost due to Jan. 6th". Putting a one day limit on such an event can be misleading.

It addresses the day you guys love so much, and correctly states how many lives where lost that day. If you want to change it so that it encompasses any death that ever takes place in the future that can be conveniently connected to that date, then you could artificially inflate the number as high as you want.

 

[Laniakea]

And yet you cannot defend your nattering.

Please try to make actual points instead of making futile complaints about an event that you refuse to understand.

You're free to not reply to my posts. Also not to read them if they upset you so much.

 

[fantome profane]

Ah, now someone being injured is equal to "lives lost". Got it.

If someone dies as a result of those injuries, yes, that is "lives lost".

 

[Subduction Zone]

It addresses the day you guys love so much, and correctly states how many lives where lost that day. If you want to change it so that it encompasses any death that ever takes place in the future that can be conveniently connected to that date, then you could artificially inflate the number as high as you want.

Sorry, it does not work that way. The officer that lost his life due to a stroke was probably a victim of January 6. The women that was part of an armed mob that was the first to enter a room that they had to be kept out of was a victim of that mob. The whole lot of them could have been charged with felony murder.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You're free to not reply to my posts. Also not to read them if they upset you so much.

They do not upset me. In fact I enjoy correcting the ignorant.

 

[Laniakea]

If someone dies as a result of those injuries, yes, that is "lives lost".

Well, that's not the case here.

 

[Laniakea]

Sorry, it does not work that way. The officer that lost his life due to a stroke was probably a victim of January 6. The women that was part of an armed mob that was the first to enter a room that they had to be kept out of was a victim of that mob. The whole lot of them could have been charged with felony murder.

Oh my! "Probably" isn't proof. But it's much more accurate to say that he "probably" died of a stroke due to his poor health.
Do you see your error now?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well, that's not the case here.

How would you know that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh my! "Probably" isn't proof. But it's much more accurate to say that he "probably" died of a stroke due to his poor health.
Do you see your error now?

It takes away your right of denial. Please, I need to remind you that copying me does not work when you are the one that is wrong.

 

[Laniakea]

How would you know that?

A heart attack can't be proven to be the cause of anything other than a person's underlying health problems.