outhouse
Atheistically
What does the devil want us to do?
double facepalm.
the devil as you see it, evolved over thousands of years.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What does the devil want us to do?
What was from the beginning was Not God because God was 'before' the beginning.
Jesus was in the beginning [Rev 3v14] but Not before the beginning as God was.
God had No beginning according to Psalm 90v2.
As 1st John [1v3] uses the word 'and' and 'with' in conjunction with God 'and' Jesus being separate. When one is 'with' another there is another one involved.
Worship in Scripture can be either in an absolute sense, or relative sense as in doing obeisance [bow in respect] .
the devil as you see it, evolved over thousands of years.
Yes :yes:.Outhouse,
i forgot, you know everything
1Cr 8:2 Anyone who claims to know all the answers doesn't really know very much
In Love,
Tom
How mature!
Really shows that you deserve no replies and that you've nothing useful to say.
What was from the beginning was Not God because God was 'before' the beginning.
Jesus was in the beginning [Rev 3v14] but Not before the beginning as God was.
As 1st John [1v3] uses the word 'and' and 'with' in conjunction with God 'and' Jesus being separate. When one is 'with' another there is another one involved.
Worship in Scripture can be either in an absolute sense, or relative sense as in doing obeisance [bow in respect]
You actually have the Possessive case correct (Most translations erroneously use "Everlasting Father" ignoring the possessive case like it doesn't exist), but it says "Father of the age" as the Douay Rheims says, Ad does not necessarily mean Eternity and usually implies a set period of time.Isaiah 9:6 calls him the Father of Eternity.
God had No beginning according to Psalm 90v2.
You actually have the Possessive case correct (Most translations erroneously use "Everlasting Father" ignoring the possessive case like it doesn't exist), but it says "Father of the age" as the Douay Rheims says, Ad does not necessarily mean Eternity and usually implies a set period of time.
Hebrews 1:10 is not necessarily about Jesus, it's from a totally different Psalm than 1:8, which is specifically introduced as "To the Son he says".
I believe "Father of Eternity" is more accurate Hebrew, so "everlasting Father" would fit better than, "Father of the age".
Amos 1:11
What you believe is nice, and "Ad" can in fact mean "Forever and ever", but not always. As long as the "Father of" is acknowledged, that's halfway.
From my understanding of scripture, God is from everlasting. He is eternal, has always existed, so Father of Eternity or everlasting Father is a good translation. The Son is also eternal and has always coexisted with the Father and created all things.
If the son always coexisted there would be no reason to distinguish him as a son. Even the term only begotten still means that the the son did not always exist. You would never say that God was begotten since God is eternal.From my understanding of scripture, God is from everlasting. He is eternal, has always existed, so Father of Eternity or everlasting Father is a good translation. The Son is also eternal and has always coexisted with the Father and created all things.
Outhouse,
i forgot, you know everything
1Cr 8:2 Anyone who claims to know all the answers doesn't really know very much
In Love,
Tom
What would the Devil want you to believe? I cant believe you bought this.... My heart is sad. Can I ask, Do you believe that you have a personal relationship with Jesus? I bet even if someone said to Jesus, "My Lord and My God", you wouldnt believe it...
In Love,
Tom