But right here shows you said only one gender can use them and they are not needed. But again I admit you won this one since I cant produce what has been deleted.
Your post
"A regular toilet works just as well, just as fine, and doesn't waste space or
scream male insecurity"
Will other schools follow? "PALMER — Mat-Su school officials will no longer allow transgender students to choose bathrooms that match their gender identity, suspending a practice recommended by district guidelines for over seven years. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District school...
www.religiousforums.com
Your post
"If you think you have to have on for things to be equal, yeah it's very insecure to think equality/gender neutral includes something only you will use that you don't need (in this case thinking a
male-specific toilet is necessary)"
Unisex toilet is exclusionary of resttoom sharing in order to accommodate somebody's number one simultaneously with somebody else's number two. Yeah. We have them all over California and they just have a regular toilet.
www.religiousforums.com
Your post
Yeah, but I still stand firm it is not equalizing something to have something you don't need and
only one is going to be using and can't use all the time anyways.
Unisex toilet is exclusionary of resttoom sharing in order to accommodate somebody's number one simultaneously with somebody else's number two. Yeah. We have them all over California and they just have a regular toilet.
www.religiousforums.com