IMO, this should be ironed out by both the NFL and the player's union working together to try and find an amiable solution.
I would imagine that will be the case.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
IMO, this should be ironed out by both the NFL and the player's union working together to try and find an amiable solution.
Just take the flag down and quit playing the National Anthem then. Problem solved. Who needs them? They inspired fighting men for centuries. Today, they are just in the way of the new order.Oh, another nonsensical, stupid-*** straw man. How nice.
If anyone "hates America", it's those who think obligatory participation in creepy flag idolatry should take precedence over the actual values (rights, liberty, justice, equality, etc.) that the flag is supposed to represent.
Just take the flag down and quit playing the National Anthem then. Problem solved. Who needs them? They inspired fighting men for centuries. Today, they are just in the way of the new order.
Don't forget to flip a finger at a veteran when you see one.
Just take the flag down and quit playing the National Anthem then. Problem solved. Who needs them? They inspired fighting men for centuries. Today, they are just in the way of the new order.
Don't forget to flip a finger at a veteran when you see one.
Why should they? You think it's the NFL's responsibility for social justice or whatever?
Name calling means the debater has nothing of substance to debate with....aaaaaand even more nonsensical, stupid-*** straw men. Building an army of them, are we?
Name calling means the debater has nothing of substance to debate with.
I've been called worse. Runs right off.
So why kneel? Kneeling is usually a sign of worship or reverence (for something or someone).No one kneeling during the national anthem is against veterans. They are disappointed in our country in the way law enforcement is allowed to mistreat minorities without any repercussions. There's a big difference between the two. As the old saying goes, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". Some players feel that it would be morally irresponsible if they didn't use the platform they have to speak out against evil.
On the league/ownership side of things, do they really want to appear to be squashing protests about social inequalities? They have their own image to consider, and a bunch of rich white dudes telling black players what they are and are not allowed to talk about might not come off looking so good.
So debate. What part of my "argument" is weak? What part is fallacy?...I haven't even called you anything. I'm calling your weak argument a straw man, which is a type of fallacy: Straw man - Wikipedia
No, as corporations have too much control over their workers as it is. IMO, we need to ditch the term "human resources" and start acknowledging people as people and not a resource.If they made such a rule, would you support their rights to do so?
When you go from peaceful protests that interrupts and interferes with nothing to those who chant "death to America" while burning an American flag, that is erecting a straw man.I think it's funny that when someone has no debate protocols they use the words "straw man".
The NFL isn't good for tax payers. If they lose such social significance the NFL Players Club might just be made to start paying taxes, teams may not be able to strong arm cities into new stadiums and flashy new toys, and we might finally be able to firmly and definitively get it out there that there is a link between playing football and head trauma.It's clear that the kneeling isn't a good thing for the NFL, no matter what the nay sayers say.
The whole purpose was lost a long time ago. It's time to move on. Kaepernic failed. The racists turned it into a patriotic thing.Inspired by: http://www.profootballweekly.com/20...d-penalty-for-kneeling-before-anthem/a3ss9ts/
Players found on the field kneeling during the national anthem their team may be subjected to a 15-yard penalty. What is sad is this will only create a polarizing environment for professional athletes who feel the need to protest and those who don't. Sad that in Trump's America we can move goal posts when it comes to free speech. I find that free speech is appropriate depending on who you are politically, and racially. For example, I do not see free speech proponents defend NFL players but I do see them come out in defense of the Charlottesville protests. Regardless of the venue of protests, if we're to defend liberty it must not be done by convenience, but by equity.
So debate. What part of my "argument" is weak? What part is fallacy?
Does it not hurt a veteran who lost a leg in a war to see people disrespecting the same ideology he fought for? Do people have the freedom (and right) to beat up servicemen or shoot them? We have played the National Anthem before every sporting event, and in the Olympics. It was a great feeling of unity to participate in it for decades. What happened?
Are they spitting on it? Blowing their nose on it? Wiping their *** with it? They aren't disrespecting anyone or anything. And, certainly, you aren't paying them to stand for the anthem either. Stats, after all, aren't based on how long they could stare at the flag without blinking, how upright they stood during the anthem, and how much they shifted positions.I don't pay them to insult our flag
If people are such snowflakes that they can't stand the site of someone not glorifying, idolizing, and worshiping a piece of cloth they should get upset and learn how to get over it. And even if the players were disrespecting the flag, it's our right as Americans to do so.make people who hold that precious upset.
Are they spitting on it? Blowing their nose on it? Wiping their *** with it? They aren't disrespecting anyone or anything. And, certainly, you aren't paying them to stand for the anthem either. Stats, after all, aren't based on how long they could stare at the flag without blinking, how upright they stood during the anthem, and how much they shifted positions.
If people are such snowflakes that they can't stand the site of someone not glorifying, idolizing, and worshiping a piece of cloth they should get upset and learn how to get over it. And even if the players were disrespecting the flag, it's our right as Americans to do so.
You are making my case. Thank you.
Well they are talking about requiring them to stand which was the whole point of your thread
Considering that the flag is supposed to symbolize freedom, preventing people from disrespecting the flag is itself disrespecting the flag. How ironic.
But if the NFL owners added one, they would be entirely within their rights.