True and False Prophets - Just and Honest Determination

[WonderingWorrier]

The Church has the prophetic message from God to share with the world. I don't need to identify any one in particular.

But if you deny a prophet you are denying the gospel message. If you can't identify prophets then you don't know what Jesus was talking about.

"Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word". John

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil". Matthew.


You could be considered as being a false Christian by having a belief in assumptions. Assumptions are deniable.

If you can't identify any other messengers then clearly you don't actually know what the message is.

 

[Brian2]

Muslims, LDS, Bahais, Ahmadiyyas and others have their own word of God. Why should they agree to what Bible or Jesus have said?
That is why I said 'get down from your high horse'.

Afaik Arab Christians call God Allah, which is just Arab for God.
Baha'is use the word for God that is used in any language. With Bahai's it is about who Baha'u'llah is and whether he fits Biblical prophecies of the return of Christ.
Ahmadiyyas? I don't know of them.
LDS use the same word for God afaik.
None of the above religions need to agree to what the Bible or Jesus have said and they don't agree with the Bible or what Jesus said.
I think post 191 is the first post you wrote to me on this topic. Maybe you think I am someone else.

 

[Brian2]

But if you deny a prophet you are denying the gospel message. If you can't identify prophets then you don't know what Jesus was talking about.

"Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word". John

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil". Matthew.


You could be considered as being a false Christian by having a belief in assumptions. Assumptions are deniable.

If you can't identify any other messengers then clearly you don't actually know what the message is.

Why do you think that anyone who identifies another prophet has identified a true prophet?

 

[Aupmanyav]

Afaik Arab Christians call God Allah, which is just Arab for God.
Baha'is use the word for God that is used in any language. With Bahai's it is about who Baha'u'llah is and whether he fits Biblical prophecies of the return of Christ.
Ahmadiyyas? I don't know of them.
LDS use the same word for God afaik.
None of the above religions need to agree to what the Bible or Jesus have said and they don't agree with the Bible or what Jesus said.
I think post 191 is the first post you wrote to me on this topic. May be you think I am someone else.

No. I was addressing your post that Muhammad and Bahaollah are false prophets. Now you say that since they accept God, it does not matter if they do not accept Bible or Jesus.
You have changed your stance and now you agree that they are not false prophets.

Your post #185: "Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah are false prophets because of their fruits, they deny the Bible, the Word of God, and cause their followers also to deny it."

 

[Brian2]

No. I was addressing your post that Muhammad and Bahaollah are false prophets. Now you say that since they accept God, it does not matter if they do not accept Bible or Jesus.
You have changed your stance and now you agree that they are not false prophets.

Your post #185: "Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah are false prophets because of their fruits, they deny the Bible, the Word of God, and cause their followers also to deny it."

I made no such statement that it did not matter if they do not accept the Bible or Jesus.
I have not changed my stance.
Show me what I said that makes you think that I have changed my stance.