Trump backs out of 60 Minutes Interview

[SkepticThinker]

So how are:

• Increasing production of US energy
• Rein in wasteful spending
• Enforcing immigration laws
• No tax on tips or OT
• Rebalance trade
• Bring back more manufacturing to the US
• Strengthen Medicare
• Protect Social Security
• Protect schools
• Combat antisemitism
• Protect free speech
• Increase military spending and modernize

embedded in project 2025? These are in Agenda 47.

Those aren't actual policies.
Just a list of buzz words and phrases.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Hardly untrue. The woman is a basket case and clearly dosent have the ability to run the country whatsoever in any real capacity.
That 60 minute interview, the View, and that sex and body show was literally
the end of her run for president.

Seeing her first hand conducting those interviews it's about as grounded and reputable as information can get.

A basket case, huh? What do you mean by that, exactly? Spell it out. Does she think we can nuke hurricanes? Does she think that when batteries get wet they stop working? Does she believe she won an election that she actually lost by a mile? Does she think there were airport attacks during the Revolutionary War? Does she sexually assault people and then defame them? Does she get upset when you ask her tough questions, accuse you of being "nasty" and then suggest you have blood "coming out of her wherever?" Does she refer to herself as a "very stable genius" and "so great looking and smart?" Does she suggest that immigrants have "bad genes" and are born murderers and psychos that are poisoning the country with their bad genes and diseases? Does she ramble on and on about herself and tell bizarre, disjointed stories for hours and hours at her rallies? Did she compare herself to Abraham Lincoln and suggest she's even better? Does she believe that exercise depletes the body's reserves of energy? Did she suggest injecting bleach into the body to wipe out COVID on national television?

Oh no, that's your guy. My bad.

I mean, you wouldn't just be throwing out misogynistic buzz words, right? You've got some substance to back up these sexist claims, I'm sure.

The thing is the left wing knows full well they are hopelessly stuck with her, and they are now all in massive panic mode.

Good luck.

Pure projection.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Complete denial and it shows.

But that's okay becuse the left wing is stuck with Harris and the right wing is not.

You haven't presented any actual evidence to deny.

 

[SkepticThinker]

What I asked was show me the link between the policies I posted to Project 2025. You did not do that.

As far as the rest I can say the same about you. Kamala, the dems and most of the the media are lying to you. Do you really believe she is all of a sudden a centrist after her radical past statements? I don't. She said that she agreed with everything Biden has done. If you want more of the same inflation, world wars, higher taxes, higher housing costs, less freedoms, more political prosecutions etc. etc. then hope Kamala wins. I have lived under a Trump and Biden/Harris admin. I was much better off under Trump and most people in the US think that because that was our experience.

Harris is in trouble, If Trump wins one of Michigan, Wisconsin or Pennsylvania he will win. I think PA or WI are locks for Trump at this point. MI will be close.

People who say such things seem to be completely forgetting that there was a COVID pandemic in there and that Trump utterly and completely botched the handling of it.

This is why when Republicans talk about the "good old days" of Trump, they always have to qualify it by saying "before COVID" or whatever, as if Trump's behaviour during the pandemic was completely inconsequential to anything. It's bizarre.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You must be living under a rock then.

MSN

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/27/politics/michael-ozzie-myers-election-fraud-prison-sentenced/index.html

Jury finds former Milwaukee election official guilty of obtaining fake absentee ballots

Kimberly Zapata, who argued that she was trying to expose vulnerabilities in the state’s election system, faces up to five years in prison when she's sentenced in May.

www.nbcnews.com

Yea. Democrats do election fraud too.

What point, exactly, are you trying to point out with this whataboutism?

Are you trying to say it's okay that Trump set up a scheme to steal the election because some Democrat somewhere stuffed a ballot box? Like, they cancel each other out or something?
What kind of argument is this?

Are you under the impression that if you were standing in a court room you could use such an excuse to get out of paying for the crime you committed? "Well, your Honor, other people murder people too. So I should be off the hook for going on a shooting rampage!"

 

[SkepticThinker]

I agree millions are being fooled. I am glad you agree Kamala is a charlatan.

You mean like the "business man" who created a fake university to defraud a bunch of people and ended up having to pay out a $25 million settlement?
You mean like a guy who claims to be a great business man, but declared bankruptcy at least 4 times, including 3 casinos?
You mean like the "billionaire" who hawks overpriced golden shoes, coins and digital trading cards online?
You mean like the guy who set up a charity and then proceeded to steal from it to buy portraits of himself?
You mean the man that was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up an affair he had with a porn star while his wife was at home nursing their newborn?
You mean the man who claimed he won an election he lost and then proceeded to set up an elaborate scheme to stay in power?

That's a charlatan.
What has Kamala done that rises to the level of any of these?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I agree millions are being fooled. I am glad you agree Kamala is a charlatan.

Since I did not say or even imply such a thing, I'd appreciate you retracting that. I do not like being told that I've said what I have not.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Those aren't actual policies.
Just a list of buzz words and phrases.

Not my point at all. My question was how are these discussed in project 2025.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

People who say such things seem to be completely forgetting that there was a COVID pandemic in there and that Trump utterly and completely botched the handling of it.

This is why when Republicans talk about the "good old days" of Trump, they always have to qualify it by saying "before COVID" or whatever, as if Trump's behaviour during the pandemic was completely inconsequential to anything. It's bizarre.

It is because he did what the experts said to do. No one were experts in this kind of pandemic so he looked to them and did what they said. If you disagree with his response then blame the experts. He tried to open things up sooner but the dems fought that. He fast tracked the vaccine which the dems wanted to force everyone to take which Trump was correctly against.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

You mean like the "business man" who created a fake university to defraud a bunch of people and ended up having to pay out a $25 million settlement?
You mean like a guy who claims to be a great business man, but declared bankruptcy at least 4 times, including 3 casinos?
You mean like the "billionaire" who hawks overpriced golden shoes, coins and digital trading cards online?
You mean like the guy who set up a charity and then proceeded to steal from it to buy portraits of himself?
You mean the man that was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up an affair he had with a porn star while his wife was at home nursing their newborn?
You mean the man who claimed he won an election he lost and then proceeded to set up an elaborate scheme to stay in power?

That's a charlatan.
What has Kamala done that rises to the level of any of these?

I am concerned about you and the dems mental health once Trump wins. I can respond to each one of those but why should take the time. You guys will just insult me and Trump. You guys have issues.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Since I did not say or even imply such a thing, I'd appreciate you retracting that. I do not like being told that I've said what I have not.

Ok, I retract that. You did not specify, I assumed it was Kamala.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Not my point at all. My question was how are these discussed in project 2025.

Ah, so you don't care that the list off buzz phrases you posted aren't actual policies?
Got it.

 

[SkepticThinker]

It is because he did what the experts said to do. No one were experts in this kind of pandemic so he looked to them and did what they said. If you disagree with his response then blame the experts. He tried to open things up sooner but the dems fought that. He fast tracked the vaccine which the dems wanted to force everyone to take which Trump was correctly against.

Nah, he didn't do what the experts said to do.

The rest of the world did though, mainly.

See what you did there? You said that Trump followed the experts, and then he didn't.

The only good thing he did was to fast track the vaccine (which was happening worldwide anyway) but then totally botched the distribution of those vaccines.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Ah, so you don't care that the list off buzz phrases you posted aren't actual policies?
Got it.

That is not what I said at all but feel free to lie about me because I am a scum Trump supporter.

You jumped in the middle of a conversation erroneously thinking you knew what it was about.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Nah, he didn't do what the experts said to do.

The rest of the world did though, mainly.

Oh ok. Thanks.

 

[Twilight Hue]

What point, exactly, are you trying to point out with this whataboutism?

Are you trying to say it's okay that Trump set up a scheme to steal the election because some Democrat somewhere stuffed a ballot box? Like, they cancel each other out or something?
What kind of argument is this?

Are you under the impression that if you were standing in a court room you could use such an excuse to get out of paying for the crime you committed? "Well, your Honor, other people murder people too. So I should be off the hook for going on a shooting rampage!"

If it's like what you say , then why isn't Trump already in the same position as the other election fraudsters?

 

[Subduction Zone]

It is because he did what the experts said to do. No one were experts in this kind of pandemic so he looked to them and did what they said. If you disagree with his response then blame the experts. He tried to open things up sooner but the dems fought that. He fast tracked the vaccine which the dems wanted to force everyone to take which Trump was correctly against.

No, he did not do that, and that was the problem. He often went against what the experts told him. When the vaccines were freely available he did not strongly endorse them. He made incredibly ignorant suggestions that only got in the way of dealing with the pandemic. It was handled fairly well in spite of Trump not due to Trump.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Meanwhile Trump continues to be insane about the interview that he was too much of a coward to take:

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Meanwhile Trump continues to be insane about the interview that he was too much of a coward to take:

View attachment 98262

Gotta ask -- how would he know that 60 Minutes tampered with the interview?

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

No, he did not do that, and that was the problem. He often went against what the experts told him. When the vaccines were freely available he did not strongly endorse them. He made incredibly ignorant suggestions that only got in the way of dealing with the pandemic. It was handled fairly well in spite of Trump not due to Trump.

Ok,