The U.S. constitution is extremely clear that it is up to the states to run the elections.
Aside from that, your question makes no sense.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump kicked off Colorado ballot
- Thread starter Viker
- Start date
Aside from that, your question makes no sense.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
That would be fine for internal State elections, but Federal elections require cooperation with all the states , and that would require a fair set of rules that all states can agree with and abide by.
That depends if your constitution has any meaning including the 14th amendment section 3, or not worth the paper it's printed on, like the declaration of independence which says that Jefferson's and Washington's slaves had the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and says nothing at all about their women.
I don't care if you think it is fine or not. It is what the Constitution says.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
That's fine of course that you have an opinion as do I. I'm sure we can both agree that the Supreme Court will settle it for the nation.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It's a bit like the Bible isn't it?
The words are there , but interpretation can be vague and unclear leading to debates like this one here.
But as they say, you have to choose sides and the results of the exchanges and banter will speak for itself as it gets determined by by the ruling class in this nation who decides these things over us common people.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
What was Trump convicted of in Colorado?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Why did Colorado convene a court to remove Trump from the ballot if there is no conviction?
McBell
Admiral Obvious
What was Trump convicted of in Colorado?
Your inability to answer that question is seriously taxing your credibility.
As for your question, I shall not be addressing it until AFTER you address my question.
Though I will give you a hint, your above question has already been answered by others in this very thread.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I'm not playing your stupid game. You haven't made sense this entire thread.
Only in the sense that people who have never read it still think they know what it says.
But the constitution is not that complicated, it is not that long and does not contain anywhere near the number on contradictions that the Bible does. You can read the Constitution in an afternoon. I recommend doing so.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Maybe I will play your stupid little game a bit longer. Here's a synopsis from the experts and from a reliable source both listing the pros and cons of the matter which it was a divided issue even with the experts.
I'm with the crowd that says Trump was denied due process and was subjected to double jeopardy as he was already indicted for insurrection which the trial starts in March 2024 and cannot be tried elsewhere for the same crime. What this farce of a trial is all about is for no other reason than to illegally remove him by bastardizing the Constitution and to give the neo-Democrats an illegal advantage.
Even the lower courts didn't want to touch this and allowed Trump to remain on The ballot and rightfully so until until this particular court arrived on the scene and bastardized the Constitution just for the purpose to gain an advantage for the neo-Democrats through what is none other than an attempt at election interference.
But of course this will be a matter for the Supreme Court to decide, and its their decision that will be the final answer on the matter and that will be that.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
You can not answer because he was not convicted of anything in Colorado.
Thus, there is no way it is double jeopardy.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Does this mean you are going to stop making a fool of yourself over it until after the Supreme Court decision?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Nothing your saying in the entirety of this thread has made any sense whatsoever and it clearly shows. You've contradicted and ignored just about every expert out there.
But yea, I'll accept whatever decision the Supreme Court makes which is likely going to be keeping Trump on the ballot, thus preserving the Integrity and legitimacy of the election system in the United States.
If not, I'm just going to grab some popcorn and watch candidates getting booted off state ballots across the country without due process while the left makes a mockery of the election system in this country as they continue on with their power grabs by eliminating any threat to their power and control over people.
No doubt Trumps behavior is terrible. But I believe in the constitution and due process.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
By
So you think Trumps disqualification by the Colorado Supreme Court is unconstitutional, even though the Constitution says the anyone who took an oath to support the Constitution and engaged in insurrection is ineligible to become president. I see.
You know you’re twisting things and you’re leaving out due process.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
How is Trump being denied due process?
@Wandering Monk Still waiting.