• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump ordered to pay nearly 355 million in NY fraud case.

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
The trial only demonstrated that a corrupt judge was in charge of rendering a verdict.

The trial proved that a corrupt defendant was liable for financial fraud and illegal conduct.

Both sides had requested a summary judgment from the judge and that is what they got. Trump's financial penalty could have been worse, but it might have been better if he had kept a civil tongue during the trial. Repeatedly slandering the judge and court personnel may have helped to rally his base and raise money, but now he needs to raise even more money. You can help, if you want to own a shiny new pair of golden sneakers.
 
Last edited:

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Last edited:

F1fan

Veteran Member
Not quite. New York's governor had to make it clear to business owners in NY that it was only Trump that is being targeted, but other business owners have nothing to worry about. Hochul tells NY businesses not to fear about Trump verdict: ‘Nothing to worry about’.

Either every other business owner is above the law, or Trump is the only one they consider to be beneath it.
Has it occurred to you that other businesses follow the law?

There has been plenty of right wing disinformation that claims Trump did nothing wrong and other businesses should worry about being indicted. Fear mongering only works on the gullible.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Dang, poor Donny's gofundme is slowing down. Only about $110,000 today. Five days in and not even a million bucks yet. Where's the love?

$915,627 raised of $355,000,000 goal
•16.6K donations

Are Trump supporters starting to realize they are being taken advantage of?

I wonder how his shoe sales are going. Well, he only had 1000 made and they sold out. So only $400,000 minus costs. Should have made 2000. Or 10,000 and lied about it being only 1000.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
My helper showed up today at my place to
borrow some tools. He held forth on politics.
- He never heard of false electors.
- Trump loves this country.
- Biden & all the Democrats hate this country.
- Trump did nothing wrong by committing bank fraud.
- Trump is merely being persecuted by Democrats.
- Trump is highly intelligent.

He's pretty typical of Magas I know.
They live in a world of different & missing facts.
And strong feelings for him.
 
Last edited:

Laniakea

Not of this world
Has it occurred to you that other businesses follow the law?

There has been plenty of right wing disinformation that claims Trump did nothing wrong and other businesses should worry about being indicted. Fear mongering only works on the gullible.
ALL of them? Then why would Hochul need to issue such a statement if other businesses didn't show concern over what happened to Trump happening to them?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
ALL of them? Then why would Hochul need to issue such a statement if other businesses didn't show concern over what happened to Trump happening to them?
Do you have a better source? I would like to see the Reuters article since they are reliable but I could not find it. And this source rates "mixed" on factuality. It is slightly left wing, but more important is how factually accurate a source is and this one fails at that.

 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Not much better as far as sources go. I found this claim on The Guardian as well. Three sources, but all three are not rated highly for reliability. The Hindustan Times says that it was a Reuters story. I couldn't find it. Th Guardian said it was a podcast. No direct link to it and none of the recent podcasts from that source have that info in their descriptions. I was too disheartened to even click on the link.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
The trial only demonstrated that a corrupt judge was in charge of rendering a verdict.
Only to MAGA, who apparently thinks everyone in the universe save for Trump, are a bunch of corrupt liars out to get Trump.
It couldn't possibly be that Trump is a career criminal and a fraud who is finally facing the consequences of his actions. . Nah, there's no evidence of that (Trump University, Trump Charity). Nothing to see here! It's everyone else who is the problem! Not Dear Leader!
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
ALL of them? Then why would Hochul need to issue such a statement if other businesses didn't show concern over what happened to Trump happening to them?
Trump has a history of breaking laws. And a history of fraud. Trump's crimes were so egregious and obvious that he had to be prosecuted. No doubt other businesses broke laws in valuation and committed fraud, but those crimes have to be proven, and worth prosecution. White collar crimes take a lot of work and involve many experts, which is costly.

I wouldn't be surprised if many businesses do plea deals or update filings rather than denying wrongdoing and being prosecuted. As we see Trump is a special kind of stupid. His antics and ego has cost him the second Carroll judgment of $83.3 million. All he had to do was not defame her again. All he had to do was follow the rules in court. He can't control himself, and the idiot is on a downward spiral. And he's to blame for all of it.
I'll bet these businesses won't dare cross the line by breaking laws as Trump did. Trump is the poster child for why obeying laws is a smart and winning business move.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
So let me get this straight. It is illegal for someone to go to a bank to take out a loan and put some of their assests up for collateral. They say the assest/s are worth this much and either the company that is giving the loan either agrees or disagrees with your estimate. If they agree fine if they disagree and come up with a different figure you can either negotiate with them or go somewhere else.
If you think it is illeagal then you would be breaking the law if you asked your boss for a raise and said you were worth X number of dollars.
 

McBell

Unbound
So let me get this straight. It is illegal for someone to go to a bank to take out a loan and put some of their assests up for collateral. They say the assest/s are worth this much and either the company that is giving the loan either agrees or disagrees with your estimate. If they agree fine if they disagree and come up with a different figure you can either negotiate with them or go somewhere else.
If you think it is illeagal then you would be breaking the law if you asked your boss for a raise and said you were worth X number of dollars.
It is just too cute that you think getting a bank loan is the equivalent to asking your boss for a raise.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
So let me get this straight. It is illegal for someone to go to a bank to take out a loan and put some of their assests up for collateral.

No, it's illegal to lie about the value of those assets.

They say the assest/s are worth this much and either the company that is giving the loan either agrees or disagrees with your estimate. If they agree fine if they disagree and come up with a different figure you can either negotiate with them or go somewhere else.

Like I said earlier: what seems to have happened was that Trump used one appraisal (from before the development restrictions) that said Mar-a-Lago is worth $100 million, but he was already aware that the new value was $16 million based on a new appraisal (which he was already using for tax purposes).

If you think it is illeagal then you would be breaking the law if you asked your boss for a raise and said you were worth X number of dollars.

The analogy doesn't quite fit, but going with it... it would be like asking your boss for a salary advance, arguing that you can pay it off quickly because you'll work 1000 hours a year for him, but you only intend to work 160 hours a year.

Edit: a better analogy:

You have a rare baseball card. You get it appraised at $1,000 based on it being in mint condition.

The next day, your kid pulls the card out of its case and doodles all over the back in crayon. You know the card is now not mint and worth way less, but you slide it back into the case and hide the doodles.

The day after that, you ask if you can borrow $1,000 from your friend. You tell him "you know I'm good for it - if I can't save up enough to pay you back, I'll just sell my baseball card. It's worth $1,000 - see?" and you show him the appraisal.

You agree that in this scenario, you got the loan under false pretenses, right?
 
Last edited:
Top