Laniakea
Not of this world
Why should I have to refute your own erroneous assertions that you simply repeat from a Leftist website? It's your job to support your claims, not repeat someone else's.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump trial proves to be political after all
- Thread starter Laniakea
- Start date
We Never Know
No Slack
Yes Time leans left. But they are also rated for High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Time Magazine - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Laniakea
Not of this world
Yes Time leans left. But they are also rated for High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Time Magazine - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
The Left policing the Left.
Ooooh, so convincing!
McBell
Admiral Obvious
You simply hand wave them away.
not that any one is the least bit surprised.
Interesting that you just made a claim that you will refuse to support. "erroneous assertions"
I know it is because you can not support it with anything other than more bold empty claims.
Had you bothered going to the site you would know that the "erroneous assertions" are in fact supported much better than anything you have supported in this, or any other, trump based thread.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, that should be easy, Find a center source with a high score on fact-reporting that supports your view.
We Never Know
No Slack
Can you address the post or just crow?
That fact checker is a good source unless you can show it isn't.
Laniakea
Not of this world
I went to the site. That's how I knew it was the Leftist liberal rag called "Time" (same publication that seems to think "person of the year" has to be a Leftist or a terrorist)
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Just do this: Find a center source with a high score on fact-reporting that supports your view.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Just countering your factually inaccurate statements.
Go ahead and hang your MAGA hat on the hope that Trump's conviction(s) will be overturned on appeal. I'm sure it'll happen for you guys sometime. How many are we at now?
Laniakea
Not of this world
Regarding what? I've done that before using sites such as The Hill, and then heard claims that it was misinformation because the story I cited didn't agree with a liberal here.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Because they're not erroneous.
Your claims were the erroneous ones. We all know you got them from Fox News though, so we won't blame you entirely for trying them out here.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Too bad you couldn't use a legit source to "counter" anything.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Doesn't even have to find a center source.
All they needs do is find a source that is factually correct.
Laniakea
Not of this world
I don't remember citing Fox News. Can you show me where I did? Or do you spend so much time on their site that you believe they are the source of everything anyone says?
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
I am not good at making such searches. But you seem to able to do it, so you could help me out, because I can't do it on my own.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
No, it has to be a center source, because if a left source is biased, then so is a right source.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I didn't post a source. I stated a fact. Trump is a convicted felon. You're confusing me with someone else. And you're confusing Time magazine with a "liberal rag" which is beyond ironic given that almost everything you've said here was cribbed from Fox News, a notoriously unreliable source that had to pay a giant settlement for knowingly lying on air to their viewers.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
It's where all your talking points are from.
As I've mentioned elsewhere, I watched Fox News the night the verdict came down, knowing that all the talking points they were using were going to be parroted almost word-for-word on this very board. And you have not disappointed.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Which are refuted in the Time source presented that they absolutely refuse to look at, but still claim are "erroneous assertions".