• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump trial proves to be political after all

Spice

StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
I went to the site. That's how I knew it was the Leftist liberal rag called "Time" (same publication that seems to think "person of the year" has to be a Leftist or a terrorist)
FAIL -- correction: you did say "terrorist."
Look who was their pick in 2016:
Screenshot_20240605_153644_Chrome.jpg
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I disagree. IMO If a democrat running for DA used "if elected I will prosecute Donald Trump" as part of his campaign platform, that made it political.

And to be honest, when it comes time for his re-election, the convicting of Trump will be his headpiece of his re-election platform.
I am not so sure about that. That is akin to saying "If elected I will prosecute all criminals" was that promise even made? Without context it is hard to judge. Trump was no prosecuted because he is a Republican. He was prosecuted because he was guilty.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
and that it was beyond the statute of limitations.
Some more truth for you to flat out ignore:
Trump's case was tried in New York, where the statute of limitations is five years for all but the most serious felonies and two years for misdemeanors. The charge against Trump, falsifying business records in the first degree, is a Class E felony. That means the statute of limitations is five years.​
Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.​
"In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.​
Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-year time limit," Merchan wrote.​

 

We Never Know

No Slack
Some more truth for you to flat out ignore:
Trump's case was tried in New York, where the statute of limitations is five years for all but the most serious felonies and two years for misdemeanors. The charge against Trump, falsifying business records in the first degree, is a Class E felony. That means the statute of limitations is five years.​
Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.​
"In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.​
Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-year time limit," Merchan wrote.​

"The charge against Trump, falsifying business records in the first degree, is a Class E felony. That means the statute of limitations is five years."

Clarification. Falsification of records itself is a misdemeanor. They bumped it to a class E felony on the grounds it was done to conceal another crime. That crime they said was to interfere with the presidential election.

"Falsifying business records is typically a misdemeanor, but it becomes a felony under New York Law if it was done to commit or conceal another crime. In Trump's case, prosecutors said he falsified records to interfere in the 2016 presidential election by "unlawful means"

 

We Never Know

No Slack
Some more truth for you to flat out ignore:
Trump's case was tried in New York, where the statute of limitations is five years for all but the most serious felonies and two years for misdemeanors. The charge against Trump, falsifying business records in the first degree, is a Class E felony. That means the statute of limitations is five years.​
Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.​
"In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.​
Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-year time limit," Merchan wrote.​

And this one explains it further...

"Falsifying business records in New York State can be a misdemeanor, but prosecutors can bring the charge as a felony if they believe the records were falsified to conceal another crime.

Manhattan district attorney Alvin L. Bragg had suggested that Mr. Trump concealed three potential crimes, although he has not charged him with any of those.

While “hush money” payments are not necessarily illegal prosecutors have suggested three possible crimes since filing the charges against Mr. Trump last year: a federal campaign finance violation, tax fraud and a state election-law crime.

Prosecutors do not need to prove such crimes were committed — only that there was “the intent to commit or conceal” an additional crime."


 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
And this one explains it further...

"Falsifying business records in New York State can be a misdemeanor, but prosecutors can bring the charge as a felony if they believe the records were falsified to conceal another crime.

Manhattan district attorney Alvin L. Bragg had suggested that Mr. Trump concealed three potential crimes, although he has not charged him with any of those.

While “hush money” payments are not necessarily illegal prosecutors have suggested three possible crimes since filing the charges against Mr. Trump last year: a federal campaign finance violation, tax fraud and a state election-law crime.

Prosecutors do not need to prove such crimes were committed — only that there was “the intent to commit or conceal” an additional crime."


My post is an exhaustive explanation as to why the "statute of limitations" claim is nothing more than a big steaming pile of bovine feces.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
My post is an exhaustive explanation as to why the "statute of limitations" claim is nothing more than a big steaming pile of bovine feces.
Yes. But the statue of limitations on the misdemeanor had expired. They had to say he concealed another crime to bump it to a felony so they could get around that the statute of limitations on the misdemeanor had expired.

Even though he was never charged with any other crime and the prosecutors does not need to prove such crimes were committed — only that there was “the intent to commit or conceal” an additional crime."

Taking all that in.... It does seem and sound kinda shady but I'm not in Braggs head to know what he thinks or why.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
Yes. But the statue of limitations on the misdemeanor had expired. They had to say he concealed another crime to bump it to a felony so they could get around that the statute of limitations on the misdemeanor had expired.

Even though he was never charged with any other crime and the prosecutors does not need to prove such crimes were committed — only that there was “the intent to commit or conceal” an additional crime."

Taking all that in.... It does seem and sound kinda shady but I'm not in Braggs head to know what he thinks or why.
The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.​
Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.​
 

We Never Know

No Slack
The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.​
Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.​
That doesn't change the fact that they had to change his charges to a felony to charge him.

That way they got the extension on the 5 year statue of limitations of a felony. Without changing the charge to a felony charge, they couldn't charge him.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
That doesn't change the fact that they had to change his charges to a felony to charge him.

That way they got the extension on the 5 year statue of limitations of a felony. Without changing the charge to a felony charge, they couldn't charge him.
Which doesn't change the fact that he is guilty of the charges. The only question is, if he can be punished for them.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Which doesn't change the fact that he is guilty of the charges. The only question is, if he can be punished for them.
"Which doesn't change the fact that he is guilty of the charges"

You must have replied to the wrong post. I never made that argument.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
LOL You're disagreeing that it's a fact that Donald Trump is a convicted felon?
You seriously need a source for that?

Enough with the games already. This is juvenile.
Did you lose track of your posts already? I was responding to you calling your opinions "facts".
 
Top