Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Biden told Maui wildfire survivors that he can relate, citing a small fire he had in his kitchen in 2004
Biden tells Maui survivors he can relate, citing small kitchen fire
President Joe Biden told survivors of the Maui wildfires in Lahaina that he could relate to them because of a fire in his Delaware home in 2004.www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org
Since when is undermining a free election "patriotism".
You simply don't know what you're talking about, and merely parroting right-wing media is not an intelligent nor an honest thing to do. Numerous Pubs voted for impeachment, although not for removal, so this fact should tell even you something.
I taught it.
Yeah, Uncle Sam did a lot of that too, including separation of children from parents as an effort to exterminate culture. China even goes after them abroad.
www.nbcnews.com
I know.
Since when is undermining a free election "patriotism".
You simply don't know what you're talking about, and merely parroting right-wing media is not an intelligent nor an honest thing to do. Numerous Pubs voted for impeachment, although not for removal, so this fact should tell even you something.
I taught it.
It's quite clear you have nothing intelligent nor honest to offer here, so "congrats" on successfully shooting yourself in the foot. Good job!
Har har. "Patriot Act" big fan of Baby Bush were ya .. another Patriotic Neocon .. for the fallacyman. 
The dude tried to overturn a free and fair election and the will of the American people and stay in power anyway, like some two-bit dictator. In over 60 court cases he offered ZERO evidence that the election was fraudulent. He and his co-conspirators fomented a violent assault on the Capitol building to stop the peaceful transfer of power, set up fake electors in several different states and tried to bully election officials to "find" votes for him."I taught it" You taught "The Rule of Law" and clearly have no idea how it applies in the case of the Kangaroo Clowns. and obviously no idea what Ad Hom Fallacy is .. and strawman "Right wing Media"
this blistering fallcious rant topped off with name calling .. and running from the playground ..
You then finish with some ridiculously nonsensical comment about "Free Elections" claiming someone said undermining one was Patriotism .. having absolutely no clue that free election could be full of fraud and illegitimacy. Just because everyone is free to vote in an election ... does not mean the election was fair .. the fact that you do not know this ... proving you know nothing about Patriotism .. in addition to believing a suppoting third world Kangaroo court -- cause the guy being busted is someone you hate .. is Patriotic.
Guess you thought the Patriot act was Patriotic as well aye mate
Do they not require a logic class these days for an arts degree ? .. Missed out on that one "taught rule of Law" .. this is both humorous but also sad commentary . .. on the state of our education system.
"I taught it" You taught "The Rule of Law" and clearly have no idea how it applies in the case of the Kangaroo Clowns. and obviously no idea what Ad Hom Fallacy is .. and strawman "Right wing Media"
this blistering fallcious rant topped off with name calling .. and running from the playground ..
You then finish with some ridiculously nonsensical comment about "Free Elections" claiming someone said undermining one was Patriotism .. having absolutely no clue that free election could be full of fraud and illegitimacy. Just because everyone is free to vote in an election ... does not mean the election was fair .. the fact that you do not know this ... proving you know nothing about Patriotism .. in addition to believing a suppoting third world Kangaroo court -- cause the guy being busted is someone you hate .. is Patriotic.
Guess you thought the Patriot act was Patriotic as well aye mate
Do they not require a logic class these days for an arts degree ? .. Missed out on that one "taught rule of Law" .. this is both humorous but also sad commentary . .. on the state of our education system.
All I am saying is that it was stupid to do so. Turning it around would you say he needs to be treated like everyone else in regards to his rights to be able to defend himself properly? The speedy court dates are a hindrance to his ability to properly defend himself. The indictment in DC for crimes in Florida was against DOJ policies and fairness not done for anyone else for example.
I agree, then why is he being treated differently in regards to unreasonable speedy court dates, grand jury locations, assumed guilty before any trial has begun etc.
I am not against it, I think it was a stupid move.
The defendant has a right to a speedy trial. There is no such thing as a right to delay the trial.
A mugshot does that? Who would not recognize him? Why no mugshots for the other indictments?
Because the other indictments were Federal and followed Federal procedure. The Georgia indictment followed the proceedure for the State of Georgia, the same proceedure they follow for all Georgia indictments.
Is he though? Plenty of people who participated in the January 6th insurrection have already been indicted, gone to trial and are now serving time.
Correct, but the prosecution does not have that right and the defendant can waive it. The right to a speedy trial is to protect the defendant not help the prosecution. The speedy trial dates were requested by the prosecution and Trumps lawyers argued, rightly so, that those dates do not allow Trump to defend himself properly. The prosecution had years to bring the case and they want the defense to go over millions of pages of documents in 6 months across four cases. That is unreasonable. The judges responsibility in these cases is to ensure the defendant is able to properly defend themselves, not to help the prosecution with their case.
No he was not. He was indicted first by a DC court for the records case against DOJ policy. Why do you think this was done?
Trump has no say in when he was indicted. He was indicted later than others, how is that his fault? He still needs to be able to properly defend himself. Or do you just not care about his rights because it is Trump?
The judge made a decision, you disagree with the decision. That doesn't mean his rights were violated.
No, he wasn't. The documents case was brought in Florida. In that case he was indicted in Florida and will be tried in Florida.
How could they not release it? That appears to be there policy. As to the DC indictment, I am not a lawyer and neither are you. How do you know what was against DoJ policies? It was imminently fair. He is guilty of the crimes that he has been charged with.
You keep forgetting how Republicans slowed the process down.