Yes! He could address the entire world in an audible voice, in a language each of us can understand; and clear up all of the misinformation we have of him
We have been over this before. There are so many logical problems with that proposal that I don't even know where to begin.
1. If an audible voice came from the sky, how would anyone know it was God?
2. If that voice said "now I am going to clear up all the misinformation that you have received from the messengers via scriptures," who would believe that voice, aside from some atheists, who comprise only about 7% of the human population?
Demographics of atheism
No, I was not joking.
I said: It is irrelevant that a God who can do anything could do that. God could also eradicate all of creation in one split second. Should God do that?
Apparently you did not understand what I was getting at so allow me to explain. Just because God is all-powerful so God has the power to do
anything that does not mean that God should or would do
everything that God has the power to do.
In other words, just because God has the power to do what you want God to do that is not a reason why God would or should do it.
Because getting his message across using flawed sinful and dishonest people with personal agendas has not worked.
1. You are assuming, facts not in evidence, that the messengers are flawed, sinful, and dishonest people with personal agendas.
2. You are assuming that God could use 'a better way' to communicate, but you do not know that.
3. God us not only all-powerful., God is also all-knowing, which means that God knows more than any human, since no human is all knowing. That means that God knows 'the best way' to communicate from all the available options.
The way that God communicated has worked because most people in the world believe in God because of a Messenger of God
84 percent of the world population has a faith.
Because most faiths have a religious Founder or what I call a Messenger that means most people believe in God because of a Messenger. We know that Christians and Muslims believe in a Messenger and they comprise 55% of the world population. It does not matter if you call them a Messenger; they are holy men who founded the religions, so they are intermediaries between God and man. Sure, there are a few believers who believe in God but not a Messenger but that is not the norm.
The point is that with no Messengers or holy men very few people would believe in God.
Everybody would get the same message, rather than the various messages dishonest messengers give
You do not know that the messengers are dishonest, you only believe that.
In this new age everyone has been given a new message, through the Revelation of Baha'u'llah. It is not God's fault that most people have rejected the new messenger, and that is mostly because they are clinging to their older religious traditions.
Because messengers of God don't have the credibility a voice coming from the sky, confirmed by today's technology as real would provide.
Speak for yourself and what would be credible to YOU. You have no idea what would be credible to other people.
The problems with that method are as follows:
1. God' voice cannot be confirmed by technology.
2. If speaking from the sky was a 'better way' for God to communicate God would have done so, since the all-knowing God knows the best way to communicate.