RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
That's the only proven logic that exists.
Exactly. Logic is a human construct, a product of human perception. It would be foolish therefore, to consider logic either infallible or universal.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's the only proven logic that exists.
Exactly. Logic is a human construct, a product of human perception. It would be foolish therefore, to consider logic either infallible or universal.
Humans can do that, so it’s logical to assume that God can too
Mmm .. it makes any communication between us meaningless .. nothing to do with G-d.I'm not sure humans can change the laws of logical, it's illogical.
As long as any God can not be proven by theists, it is also meaningless to talk about his so called attributes given by men.Mmm .. it makes any communication between us meaningless .. nothing to do with G-d.
It becomes a part of language construction and grammar.
If you think that, then you are wasting your time making any posts on the topic.As long as any God can not be proven by theists, it is also meaningless to talk about his so called attributes..
That's what I said earlier #274If you think that, then you are wasting your time making any posts on the topic.
Of course you do. If you believe that your prophet flew to the 7th heaven riding a non existent animal, met, discussed and bargained with God and returned to earth, then you could believe anything.I think otherwise.
..or if I believed that 'fingers crossed' meant that I had a better chance of something happening..If you believe that your prophet flew to the 7th heaven riding a non existent animal..
I did. That was an example of "Gibberish".Despite what you write, I never mentioned married bachelor,
That "No" makes the case.No. So what...........?
Nobody said that's man's logic is universal of infallible. But does any other logic exist?Man's logic cannot be universal or infallible. Because man is not.
My gosh, that's common sense! LOL
I don't know. Do you?Nobody said that's man's logic is universal of infallible. But does any other logic exist?
That's a philosophical naturalists position. Well, if that's your epistemology, that's fine, but then the topic is about a methodological argument as stipulated in the heading and OP. So you have to make an internal critic, not base your epistemology as the default.Yeah but if you don't think it a human construct, what else could it be? Considering we are humans, it's all that matters isn't it?
I said already that in my view, no other logic exists apart from human logic.I don't know. Do you?
Well, that's sad but OK. I mean, since by your own words, you said that human logic is neither infallible nor universal.I said already that in my view, no other logic exists apart from human logic.
Nothing is infallible, neither can be totally universal. That ls called progress.Well, that's sad but OK. I mean, since by your own words, you said that human logic is neither infallible nor universal.
OK, so you say.Nothing is infallible, neither can be totally universal. That ls called progress.
And don't people in religions try to show how logical their interpretations are?Exactly. Logic is a human construct, a product of human perception. It would be foolish therefore, to consider logic either infallible or universal.
That "No" makes the case.