• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Verifiable evidence for creationism?

Is there any verifiable evidence for creationism?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 19.0%
  • No

    Votes: 85 81.0%

  • Total voters
    105

Thief

Rogue Theologian
NONSENSE.

Even IF I didn't know anything AT ALL it would STILL not make your case for you. You have everything to prove, and nothing TO GAIN by putting people down. As I said, you have lost all credibility.

You might regain it by answering my honest question and stop AVOIDING by asking irrelevant ones, instead.

Even IF I didn't know the difference between the living and the dead, which would make me an IDIOT, it still would NOT even come close to making your case. Digging yourself in deeper isn't a sign of honesty.

I don't need to have silly discussions with people like that.

:)

you are not a litmus test.
 

Blastcat

Active Member
there is more to life than chemistry

This is your claim, and for all I know IT MAY BE TRUE.

Unfortunately, you have not demonstrated that it is.
You have a belief that it is.

And EVEN IF it were true that there is MORE to life than chemistry, this is NOT evidence for creationism.

:)
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
This is your claim, and for all I know IT MAY BE TRUE.

Unfortunately, you have not demonstrated that it is.
You have a belief that it is.

And EVEN IF it were true that there is MORE to life than chemistry, this is NOT evidence for creationism.

:)
if you ever get past the line drawn between substance and life....
you can then go back and decide....

Spirit first?....or substance?
 

Blastcat

Active Member
if you ever get past the line drawn between substance and life....
you can then go back and decide....

Spirit first?....or substance?

You aren't being serious.

I don't try to have serious conversations with people who aren't being serious.
I can joke around like the best of them.

I'm not here to make jokes.

You have lost ALL credibility. Do you even know what that means?

;)
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
You aren't being serious.

I don't try to have serious conversations with people who aren't being serious.
I can joke around like the best of them.

I'm not here to make jokes.

You have lost ALL credibility. Do you even know what that means?

;)
you're still pretending to be the litmus test
 

AndromedaRXJ

Active Member
another lack of terms.....
I can rebuild the car.....it will start
I cannot dissect my dog and expect the animal to come back to life

life is more than chemistry

No it's all still just chemistry. The reason why you can't bring the dog back is because you permanently alter the dog by killing it. The cells start breaking down shortly after death and that prevents resuscitation. If you could reverse the brake-down of cells, you could resuscitate the dogs.

Again, the same thing can happen with a car. If you take it apart and don't put it back together perfectly, it may not start.

Also, open-heart surgery is basically live dissection.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No it's all still just chemistry. The reason why you can't bring the dog back is because you permanently alter the dog by killing it. The cells start breaking down shortly after death and that prevents resuscitation. If you could reverse the brake-down of cells, you could resuscitate the dogs.

Again, the same thing can happen with a car. If you take it apart and don't put it back together perfectly, it may not start.

Also, open-heart surgery is basically live dissection.
and open heart often fails....

how about Lazarus coming back from the grave?
 
Top