• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Verifiable evidence for creationism?

Is there any verifiable evidence for creationism?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 19.0%
  • No

    Votes: 85 81.0%

  • Total voters
    105

Thief

Rogue Theologian
let's keep to the 'point'....
science will insist ....an object at rest will remain at rest.

go back to the singularity (that science would have you believe)
and answer the question

Spirit
Often =/= always.
and dead is dead....

you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?

the dead do not beget life.

substance is dead.

Spirit first
 

Blastcat

Active Member
let's keep to the 'point'....
science will insist ....an object at rest will remain at rest.

KEEP TO THE POINT?

You are in a thread about PROOF of creationism.
You offer NOTHING but trying ( and failing miserably ) to somehow REFUTE SCIENCE.

You might imagine that EVEN if you refuted ALL of science that you have even come CLOSE to giving proof for creationism, but you are woefully mistaken.

You are making yourself completely IRRELEVANT to the conversation.
As I keep saying, you have lost any credibility you might have had.

Our good will will take you a long way, but you really should at least TRY to keep to the ACTUAL topic.
As it stands, you couldn't be further from it if you TRIED, and I don't really think you are trying ANYTHING.
I take you as a religious sounding troll, and nothing else, right now.
You should count yourself lucky that people pay you any attention at all.
_______________

go back to the singularity (that science would have you believe)
and answer the question

YOU DON"T EVEN BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.
So, who cares about your opinions on anything else?

And you DON'T GET to tell someone to go back and answer ANY questions, since you don't answer them yourself.
_______________

Spirit

and dead is dead....

WHAT ON EARTH do you IMAGINE that means to anyone? DEAD IS DEAD?... We all KNOW that, this is NOTHING but pure silliness.

_______________

you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?

the dead do not beget life.

substance is dead.

You CERTAINLY do not use science to know that "substance is dead", DO YOU?
So, you made it up. Dead is dead, and you imagine that this SPIRIT thing is real and came first.

_______________

Spirit first

You already told us that you mean THINKING AND FEELING when you talk about "SPIRIT", and now, you IMAGINE that people can THINK and FEEL without BRAINS or BODIES. This is not only nonsense, but it's delusion. I don't take any of this seriously, though, because I take you for a troll.

NOT impressive, Thief, not at all.

:(
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
KEEP TO THE POINT?

You are in a thread about PROOF of creationism.
You offer NOTHING but trying ( and failing miserably ) to somehow REFUTE SCIENCE.

You might imagine that EVEN if you refuted ALL of science that you have even come CLOSE to giving proof for creationism, but you are woefully mistaken.

You are making yourself completely IRRELEVANT to the conversation.
As I keep saying, you have lost any credibility you might have had.

Our good will will take you a long way, but you really should at least TRY to keep to the ACTUAL topic.
As it stands, you couldn't be further from it if you TRIED, and I don't really think you are trying ANYTHING.
I take you as a religious sounding troll, and nothing else, right now.
You should count yourself lucky that people pay you any attention at all.
_______________



YOU DON"T EVEN BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.
So, who cares about your opinions on anything else?

And you DON'T GET to tell someone to go back and answer ANY questions, since you don't answer them yourself.
_______________



WHAT ON EARTH do you IMAGINE that means to anyone? DEAD IS DEAD?... We all KNOW that, this is NOTHING but pure silliness.

_______________



You CERTAINLY do not use science to know that "substance is dead", DO YOU?
So, you made it up. Dead is dead, and you imagine that this SPIRIT thing is real and came first.

_______________



You already told us that you mean THINKING AND FEELING when you talk about "SPIRIT", and now, you IMAGINE that people can THINK and FEEL without BRAINS or BODIES. This is not only nonsense, but it's delusion. I don't take any of this seriously, though, because I take you for a troll.

NOT impressive, Thief, not at all.

:(
likely said so earlier in this thread.....there will never be proof
no photo, no fingerprint, no equation and no repeatable experiment.
no proof

when it comes to God.....ALL you can do....is think and feel
(you're not really capable of anything else)

faith requires no proving.....see Webster's

as for evidence....it is all around you
 

Blastcat

Active Member
likely said so earlier in this thread.....there will never be proof
no photo, no fingerprint, no equation and no repeatable experiment.
no proof

You admit that there is no proof for creationism and YET you bother coming into a thread about PROVING IT?
How ridiculous.
______________

when it comes to God.....ALL you can do....is think and feel
(you're not really capable of anything else)

THINK about what.. what the preachers tell you to think?
Feel WHAT.. your feelings about what the preachers tell you to think?

______________


faith requires no proving.....see Webster's

as for evidence....it is all around you

Then you ADMIT that there is NO proof for anything you believe in.
And AS for the evidence, that's what SCIENCE investigates, NOT what the preachers tell you to think about it.
Apparently, you don't feel the NEED to prove anything you believe in.

And YET, you are TRYING to prove that your beliefs are worth BOTHERING about. IF you aren't in here to PROVE anything, then you are merely PREACHING at us, like any other preacher. Well, THANKS for the sermons. They were perfectly BORING and useless.

You are RIDICULOUS, and seemingly proud of it.

:)
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
how about Lazarus coming back from the grave?
The problem that presents itself is in the story of the comatose girl. Unlike Lazarus, where Jesus starts off with sleep as a euphemism and then admits openly that Lazarus is dead, the girl's family assumes the girl is dead but Jesus is adamant she is only sleeping. It's hard to judge resurrection stories when you don't know how they "died".
 

AndromedaRXJ

Active Member
and dead is dead....

you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?

the dead do not beget life.

substance is dead.

Spirit first

You were implying that live dissection is impossible. As well as any form of resurrection. But doctors have done both.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
The problem that presents itself is in the story of the comatose girl. Unlike Lazarus, where Jesus starts off with sleep as a euphemism and then admits openly that Lazarus is dead, the girl's family assumes the girl is dead but Jesus is adamant she is only sleeping. It's hard to judge resurrection stories when you don't know how they "died".
and Jesus said.....Let the dead bury the dead.

get it?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
This is a room where people should at least try to give evidence for creationism.

I am not PUSHING anything on you other than THAT.

:)
it is already clear.....I think I have said so repeatedly.....
no proof

inappropriate line drawn

as for evidence.....it is everywhere
 

Blastcat

Active Member
it is already clear.....I think I have said so repeatedly.....
no proof

inappropriate line drawn

as for evidence.....it is everywhere

lol

the evidence is EVERYWHERE I LOOK


lol how pathetic.. imagine a science paper with that in it. .. my thesis is true because its everywhere.

The evidence for creationism is EVERYWHERE people.. lol

RIDICULOUSLY PATHETIC.

:)
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
lol

the evidence is EVERYWHERE I LOOK


lol how pathetic.. imagine a science paper with that in it. .. my thesis is true because its everywhere.

The evidence for creationism is EVERYWHERE people.. lol

RIDICULOUSLY PATHETIC.

:)
I think this last post of yours speaks for itself......


think about it
 

Blastcat

Active Member
I think this last post of yours speaks for itself......


think about it


You ask me to think about it.. how pathetic.

This thread is about AND ONLY ABOUT giving evidence for creationism.
Trying to put people down by sounding wise isn't going to do that.

I suggest that YOU think about it.
Because you clearly are NOT.

You seem quite happy to smugly bat us away.
But the fact of the matter is, you have offered NO evidence of any kind WHATSOEVER for your creationist beliefs.

And that would be NONE.
And that's just pathetic.

So, say something else that you consider "wise".
I don't think that you are.
 

Blastcat

Active Member
and you are now ready to choose?

Spirit first?....or substance?

I have personally answered that silly question., TWICE.
if you think it's a clever question, it's not.

Our opinions about that has no bearing on evidence for creationism.
 

Blastcat

Active Member
just for clarity.....your choice was.....what?

It doesn't matter. If you really care, you can look it up. I answered it twice. I wont do it again.
But your fun mind puzzle about what came first isn't what I consider evidence.

What is your EVIDENCE.. if you have none, then we are done with you.
Maybe then, you can move along to another thread.

This one was about EVIDENCE for creationism.
Right now, you could not be further AWAY from the topic.
 
Top