AndromedaRXJ
Active Member
and open heart often fails....
Often =/= always.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
and open heart often fails....
and dead is dead....Often =/= always.
let's keep to the 'point'....
science will insist ....an object at rest will remain at rest.
go back to the singularity (that science would have you believe)
and answer the question
Spirit
and dead is dead....
you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?
the dead do not beget life.
substance is dead.
Spirit first
likely said so earlier in this thread.....there will never be proofKEEP TO THE POINT?
You are in a thread about PROOF of creationism.
You offer NOTHING but trying ( and failing miserably ) to somehow REFUTE SCIENCE.
You might imagine that EVEN if you refuted ALL of science that you have even come CLOSE to giving proof for creationism, but you are woefully mistaken.
You are making yourself completely IRRELEVANT to the conversation.
As I keep saying, you have lost any credibility you might have had.
Our good will will take you a long way, but you really should at least TRY to keep to the ACTUAL topic.
As it stands, you couldn't be further from it if you TRIED, and I don't really think you are trying ANYTHING.
I take you as a religious sounding troll, and nothing else, right now.
You should count yourself lucky that people pay you any attention at all.
_______________
YOU DON"T EVEN BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.
So, who cares about your opinions on anything else?
And you DON'T GET to tell someone to go back and answer ANY questions, since you don't answer them yourself.
_______________
WHAT ON EARTH do you IMAGINE that means to anyone? DEAD IS DEAD?... We all KNOW that, this is NOTHING but pure silliness.
_______________
You CERTAINLY do not use science to know that "substance is dead", DO YOU?
So, you made it up. Dead is dead, and you imagine that this SPIRIT thing is real and came first.
_______________
You already told us that you mean THINKING AND FEELING when you talk about "SPIRIT", and now, you IMAGINE that people can THINK and FEEL without BRAINS or BODIES. This is not only nonsense, but it's delusion. I don't take any of this seriously, though, because I take you for a troll.
NOT impressive, Thief, not at all.
likely said so earlier in this thread.....there will never be proof
no photo, no fingerprint, no equation and no repeatable experiment.
no proof
when it comes to God.....ALL you can do....is think and feel
(you're not really capable of anything else)
faith requires no proving.....see Webster's
as for evidence....it is all around you
You admit that there is no proof for creationism and YET you bother coming into a thread about PROVING IT?
How ridiculous.
______________
and pushing non-belief in a religious forum is...... what?
The problem that presents itself is in the story of the comatose girl. Unlike Lazarus, where Jesus starts off with sleep as a euphemism and then admits openly that Lazarus is dead, the girl's family assumes the girl is dead but Jesus is adamant she is only sleeping. It's hard to judge resurrection stories when you don't know how they "died".how about Lazarus coming back from the grave?
and dead is dead....
you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?
the dead do not beget life.
substance is dead.
Spirit first
and Jesus did ...what?You were implying that live dissection is impossible. As well as any form of resurrection. But doctors have done both.
and Jesus said.....Let the dead bury the dead.The problem that presents itself is in the story of the comatose girl. Unlike Lazarus, where Jesus starts off with sleep as a euphemism and then admits openly that Lazarus is dead, the girl's family assumes the girl is dead but Jesus is adamant she is only sleeping. It's hard to judge resurrection stories when you don't know how they "died".
it is already clear.....I think I have said so repeatedly.....This is a room where people should at least try to give evidence for creationism.
I am not PUSHING anything on you other than THAT.
and Jesus did ...what?
it is already clear.....I think I have said so repeatedly.....
no proof
inappropriate line drawn
as for evidence.....it is everywhere
I think this last post of yours speaks for itself......lol
the evidence is EVERYWHERE I LOOK
lol how pathetic.. imagine a science paper with that in it. .. my thesis is true because its everywhere.
The evidence for creationism is EVERYWHERE people.. lol
RIDICULOUSLY PATHETIC.
I think this last post of yours speaks for itself......
think about it
and you are now ready to choose?
Spirit first?....or substance?
just for clarity.....your choice was.....what?I have personally answered that silly question., TWICE.
if you think it's a clever question, it's not.
Our opinions about that has no bearing on evidence for creationism.
just for clarity.....your choice was.....what?