AndromedaRXJ
Active Member
Often =/= always.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Verifiable evidence for creationism?
- Thread starter leibowde84
- Start date
Often =/= always.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
let's keep to the 'point'....
science will insist ....an object at rest will remain at rest.
go back to the singularity (that science would have you believe)
and answer the question
Spirit
you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?
the dead do not beget life.
substance is dead.
Spirit first
science will insist ....an object at rest will remain at rest.
go back to the singularity (that science would have you believe)
and answer the question
Spirit
and dead is dead....
you're not attempting to kick the line is the sand are you?
the dead do not beget life.
substance is dead.
Spirit first
Blastcat
Active Member
KEEP TO THE POINT?
You are in a thread about PROOF of creationism.
You offer NOTHING but trying ( and failing miserably ) to somehow REFUTE SCIENCE.
You might imagine that EVEN if you refuted ALL of science that you have even come CLOSE to giving proof for creationism, but you are woefully mistaken.
You are making yourself completely IRRELEVANT to the conversation.
As I keep saying, you have lost any credibility you might have had.
Our good will will take you a long way, but you really should at least TRY to keep to the ACTUAL topic.
As it stands, you couldn't be further from it if you TRIED, and I don't really think you are trying ANYTHING.
I take you as a religious sounding troll, and nothing else, right now.
You should count yourself lucky that people pay you any attention at all.
_______________
YOU DON"T EVEN BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.
So, who cares about your opinions on anything else?
And you DON'T GET to tell someone to go back and answer ANY questions, since you don't answer them yourself.
_______________
WHAT ON EARTH do you IMAGINE that means to anyone? DEAD IS DEAD?... We all KNOW that, this is NOTHING but pure silliness.
_______________
You CERTAINLY do not use science to know that "substance is dead", DO YOU?
So, you made it up. Dead is dead, and you imagine that this SPIRIT thing is real and came first.
_______________
You already told us that you mean THINKING AND FEELING when you talk about "SPIRIT", and now, you IMAGINE that people can THINK and FEEL without BRAINS or BODIES. This is not only nonsense, but it's delusion. I don't take any of this seriously, though, because I take you for a troll.
NOT impressive, Thief, not at all.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
likely said so earlier in this thread.....there will never be proofKEEP TO THE POINT?
You are in a thread about PROOF of creationism.
You offer NOTHING but trying ( and failing miserably ) to somehow REFUTE SCIENCE.
You might imagine that EVEN if you refuted ALL of science that you have even come CLOSE to giving proof for creationism, but you are woefully mistaken.
You are making yourself completely IRRELEVANT to the conversation.
As I keep saying, you have lost any credibility you might have had.
Our good will will take you a long way, but you really should at least TRY to keep to the ACTUAL topic.
As it stands, you couldn't be further from it if you TRIED, and I don't really think you are trying ANYTHING.
I take you as a religious sounding troll, and nothing else, right now.
You should count yourself lucky that people pay you any attention at all.
_______________
YOU DON"T EVEN BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.
So, who cares about your opinions on anything else?
And you DON'T GET to tell someone to go back and answer ANY questions, since you don't answer them yourself.
_______________
WHAT ON EARTH do you IMAGINE that means to anyone? DEAD IS DEAD?... We all KNOW that, this is NOTHING but pure silliness.
_______________
You CERTAINLY do not use science to know that "substance is dead", DO YOU?
So, you made it up. Dead is dead, and you imagine that this SPIRIT thing is real and came first.
_______________
You already told us that you mean THINKING AND FEELING when you talk about "SPIRIT", and now, you IMAGINE that people can THINK and FEEL without BRAINS or BODIES. This is not only nonsense, but it's delusion. I don't take any of this seriously, though, because I take you for a troll.
NOT impressive, Thief, not at all.
no photo, no fingerprint, no equation and no repeatable experiment.
no proof
when it comes to God.....ALL you can do....is think and feel
(you're not really capable of anything else)
faith requires no proving.....see Webster's
as for evidence....it is all around you
Blastcat
Active Member
You admit that there is no proof for creationism and YET you bother coming into a thread about PROVING IT?
How ridiculous.
______________
THINK about what.. what the preachers tell you to think?
Feel WHAT.. your feelings about what the preachers tell you to think?
______________
Then you ADMIT that there is NO proof for anything you believe in.
And AS for the evidence, that's what SCIENCE investigates, NOT what the preachers tell you to think about it.
Apparently, you don't feel the NEED to prove anything you believe in.
And YET, you are TRYING to prove that your beliefs are worth BOTHERING about. IF you aren't in here to PROVE anything, then you are merely PREACHING at us, like any other preacher. Well, THANKS for the sermons. They were perfectly BORING and useless.
You are RIDICULOUS, and seemingly proud of it.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
You admit that there is no proof for creationism and YET you bother coming into a thread about PROVING IT?
How ridiculous.
______________
and pushing non-belief in a religious forum is...... what?
Blastcat
Active Member
This is a room where people should at least try to give evidence for creationism.
I am not PUSHING anything on you other than THAT.
Kelly of the Phoenix
Well-Known Member
The problem that presents itself is in the story of the comatose girl. Unlike Lazarus, where Jesus starts off with sleep as a euphemism and then admits openly that Lazarus is dead, the girl's family assumes the girl is dead but Jesus is adamant she is only sleeping. It's hard to judge resurrection stories when you don't know how they "died".
AndromedaRXJ
Active Member
You were implying that live dissection is impossible. As well as any form of resurrection. But doctors have done both.
Last edited:
Thief
Rogue Theologian
and Jesus did ...what?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Thief
Rogue Theologian
it is already clear.....I think I have said so repeatedly.....This is a room where people should at least try to give evidence for creationism.
I am not PUSHING anything on you other than THAT.
no proof
inappropriate line drawn
as for evidence.....it is everywhere
Blastcat
Active Member
apparently god magic
Blastcat
Active Member
lol
the evidence is EVERYWHERE I LOOK
lol how pathetic.. imagine a science paper with that in it. .. my thesis is true because its everywhere.
The evidence for creationism is EVERYWHERE people.. lol
RIDICULOUSLY PATHETIC.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
I think this last post of yours speaks for itself......lol
the evidence is EVERYWHERE I LOOK
lol how pathetic.. imagine a science paper with that in it. .. my thesis is true because its everywhere.
The evidence for creationism is EVERYWHERE people.. lol
RIDICULOUSLY PATHETIC.
think about it
Blastcat
Active Member
You ask me to think about it.. how pathetic.
This thread is about AND ONLY ABOUT giving evidence for creationism.
Trying to put people down by sounding wise isn't going to do that.
I suggest that YOU think about it.
Because you clearly are NOT.
You seem quite happy to smugly bat us away.
But the fact of the matter is, you have offered NO evidence of any kind WHATSOEVER for your creationist beliefs.
And that would be NONE.
And that's just pathetic.
So, say something else that you consider "wise".
I don't think that you are.
Blastcat
Active Member
I have personally answered that silly question., TWICE.
if you think it's a clever question, it's not.
Our opinions about that has no bearing on evidence for creationism.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
just for clarity.....your choice was.....what?
Blastcat
Active Member
It doesn't matter. If you really care, you can look it up. I answered it twice. I wont do it again.
But your fun mind puzzle about what came first isn't what I consider evidence.
What is your EVIDENCE.. if you have none, then we are done with you.
Maybe then, you can move along to another thread.
This one was about EVIDENCE for creationism.
Right now, you could not be further AWAY from the topic.