• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Verifiable evidence for creationism?

Is there any verifiable evidence for creationism?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 19.0%
  • No

    Votes: 85 81.0%

  • Total voters
    105

Thief

Rogue Theologian
It doesn't matter. If you really care, you can look it up. I answered it twice. I wont do it again.
But your fun mind puzzle about what came first isn't what I consider evidence.

What is your EVIDENCE.. if you have none, then we are done with you.
Maybe then, you can move along to another thread.

This one was about EVIDENCE for creationism.
Right now, you could not be further AWAY from the topic.
so now you are posting to be the last entry?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
What rest?
What point is it that you need me to get passed?
You need people to accept your premise in order for you to make a case?
one notion leads to another.
if you can't start ....in the beginning.....the rest won't follow
 

Blastcat

Active Member
one notion leads to another.
if you can't start ....in the beginning.....the rest won't follow

If I can't START off by accepting your premise that spirit came first you can't prove that a spirit came first and created everything?

How..perfectly circular.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Spirit is the logical cognition that is a byproduct of complex brain functions? If so then if substance means matter then matter obviously existed before spirit.
substance won't move without 'something' to move it
(science)

consider the first singularity
 

Blastcat

Active Member
and science would say.....not substance as we now know it.

but even so.....it won't move of it's own volition
'Something' has to be there to move it

Then you would have to define what you MEAN by substance.
We KNOW that substance can move substance.

So what?
 
Top