Verifiable evidence for creationism?

[Thief]

It doesn't matter. If you really care, you can look it up. I answered it twice. I wont do it again.
But your fun mind puzzle about what came first isn't what I consider evidence.

What is your EVIDENCE.. if you have none, then we are done with you.
Maybe then, you can move along to another thread.

This one was about EVIDENCE for creationism.
Right now, you could not be further AWAY from the topic.

so now you are posting to be the last entry?

 

[Blastcat]

so now you are posting to be the last entry?

If you have no verifiable evidence for creationism, I hardly see the point.
But you seem to have a hard time admitting the truth.

It must be hard.

 

[Thief]

shall I continue without you?

 

[Blastcat]

shall I continue without you?

continue what, precisely?

and in any case, you do what you like.
but if you are done trying to give evidence for creationism, what else IS there to say?

I sure dont have any.

 

[Thief]

anyone else?

Spirit first?......or substance?

 

[Blastcat]

anyone else?

Spirit first?......or substance?

Why do you think this is a good question?

 

[Thief]

Why do you think this is a good question?

a pivot 'point'

if you can't get past this 'point' the rest has no continuity

 

[Blastcat]

a pivot 'point'

if you can't get past this 'point' the rest has no continuity

What rest?
What point is it that you need me to get passed?
You need people to accept your premise in order for you to make a case?

 

[Thief]

What rest?
What point is it that you need me to get passed?
You need people to accept your premise in order for you to make a case?

one notion leads to another.
if you can't start ....in the beginning.....the rest won't follow

 

[Blastcat]

one notion leads to another.
if you can't start ....in the beginning.....the rest won't follow

If I can't START off by accepting your premise that spirit came first you can't prove that a spirit came first and created everything?

How..perfectly circular.

 

[McBell]

anyone else?

Spirit first?......or substance?

Define "spirit"

 

[Thief]

Define "spirit"

that part of you that keeps asking for definition

 

[Midnight Rain]

that part of you that keeps asking for definition

Spirit is the logical cognition that is a byproduct of complex brain functions? If so then if substance means matter then matter obviously existed before spirit.

 

[Thief]

Spirit is the logical cognition that is a byproduct of complex brain functions? If so then if substance means matter then matter obviously existed before spirit.

substance won't move without 'something' to move it
(science)

consider the first singularity

 

[AndromedaRXJ]

and Jesus did ...what?

Uhh... idk. Probably nothing as I doubt he even existed.

 

[Thief]

Uhh... idk. Probably nothing as I doubt he even existed.

then relent the distraction and we go back to topic....

Spirit first?

 

[Thief]

If I can't START off by accepting your premise that spirit came first you can't prove that a spirit came first and created everything?

How..perfectly circular.

linear.....start at the 'point'.....and draw a line

 

[Blastcat]

linear.....start at the 'point'.....and draw a line

If the POINT is a singularity, THAT'S SUBSTANCE.

 

[Thief]

If the POINT is a singularity, THAT'S SUBSTANCE.

and science would say.....not substance as we now know it.

but even so.....it won't move of it's own volition
'Something' has to be there to move it

 

[Blastcat]

and science would say.....not substance as we now know it.

but even so.....it won't move of it's own volition
'Something' has to be there to move it

Then you would have to define what you MEAN by substance.
We KNOW that substance can move substance.

So what?