Verifiable evidence for creationism?

[Thief]

NONSENSE.

Even IF I didn't know anything AT ALL it would STILL not make your case for you. You have everything to prove, and nothing TO GAIN by putting people down. As I said, you have lost all credibility.

You might regain it by answering my honest question and stop AVOIDING by asking irrelevant ones, instead.

Even IF I didn't know the difference between the living and the dead, which would make me an IDIOT, it still would NOT even come close to making your case. Digging yourself in deeper isn't a sign of honesty.

I don't need to have silly discussions with people like that.

you are not a litmus test.

 

[Thief]

Maybe this will come as a shock to you, but your CAR isn't ALIVE so your analogy FAILS MISERABLY.
You have lost all credibility.

I think you don't get the scenario

 

[Blastcat]

I think you don't get the scenario

Yes, you imagine that when your car starts, it's ALIVE, because the parts move.
I think you don't GET your own scenario.

 

[Thief]

Yes, you imagine that when your car starts, it's ALIVE, because the parts move.
I think you don't GET your own scenario.

nay.....cars are not living entities

 

[Blastcat]

nay.....cars are not living entities

Ok, good, so WHAT does your analogy prove?

 

[Thief]

Ok, good, so WHAT does your analogy prove?

there is more to life than chemistry

 

[Blastcat]

there is more to life than chemistry

This is your claim, and for all I know IT MAY BE TRUE.

Unfortunately, you have not demonstrated that it is.
You have a belief that it is.

And EVEN IF it were true that there is MORE to life than chemistry, this is NOT evidence for creationism.

 

[Thief]

This is your claim, and for all I know IT MAY BE TRUE.

Unfortunately, you have not demonstrated that it is.
You have a belief that it is.

And EVEN IF it were true that there is MORE to life than chemistry, this is NOT evidence for creationism.

if you ever get past the line drawn between substance and life....
you can then go back and decide....

Spirit first?....or substance?

 

[Blastcat]

if you ever get past the line drawn between substance and life....
you can then go back and decide....

Spirit first?....or substance?

You aren't being serious.

I don't try to have serious conversations with people who aren't being serious.
I can joke around like the best of them.

I'm not here to make jokes.

You have lost ALL credibility. Do you even know what that means?

 

[Thief]

You aren't being serious.

I don't try to have serious conversations with people who aren't being serious.
I can joke around like the best of them.

I'm not here to make jokes.

You have lost ALL credibility. Do you even know what that means?

you're still pretending to be the litmus test

 

[AndromedaRXJ]

another lack of terms.....
I can rebuild the car.....it will start
I cannot dissect my dog and expect the animal to come back to life

life is more than chemistry

No it's all still just chemistry. The reason why you can't bring the dog back is because you permanently alter the dog by killing it. The cells start breaking down shortly after death and that prevents resuscitation. If you could reverse the brake-down of cells, you could resuscitate the dogs.

Again, the same thing can happen with a car. If you take it apart and don't put it back together perfectly, it may not start.

Also, open-heart surgery is basically live dissection.

 

[McBell]

when the life leaves the chemistry.....there's nothing wrong

that's how it works.....

Faith based claim

That's all you got

 

[McBell]

you know the difference between the living and the dead?

As a matter of fact, I do.
You have demonstrated in this very thread, however, that you do not.

 

[McBell]

I think you don't get the scenario

I suspect you are denial that your scenario is a fail

 

[Blastcat]

you're still pretending to be the litmus test

What on EARTH do you even MEAN by that?

 

[Kelly of the Phoenix]

nay.....cars are not living entities

Christine?

 

[Thief]

Christine?

couldn't make myself watch the movie....

 

[Thief]

I suspect you are denial that your scenario is a fail

ah.....you don't get it either...

 

[Thief]

As a matter of fact, I do.
You have demonstrated in this very thread, however, that you do not.

and you thought the 'Christine' movie was a documentary?

 

[Thief]

No it's all still just chemistry. The reason why you can't bring the dog back is because you permanently alter the dog by killing it. The cells start breaking down shortly after death and that prevents resuscitation. If you could reverse the brake-down of cells, you could resuscitate the dogs.

Again, the same thing can happen with a car. If you take it apart and don't put it back together perfectly, it may not start.

Also, open-heart surgery is basically live dissection.

and open heart often fails....

how about Lazarus coming back from the grave?