Anti-thesisofreason
Explorer
As have I.
But of course feelings are dismissed as evidence. Feelings aren't allowed in our society you know.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As have I.
But of course feelings are dismissed as evidence. Feelings aren't allowed in our society you know.
1.) I don’t believe in god(s) because for thousands of years people have been contemplating and wondering about the “oddities” of the planet and the universe. Religion, I assume, was initially used for explaining what humans couldn’t understand and giving relatable reasons, which would’ve been considered valid and reasonable back then, for natural phenomenon. .
2.) I don’t rely on religion because of its fallacies against accepted and, most plausible, scientific facts. In the Bible it is said that he creates Earth and space (the “heavens” in six days. But today there is much evidence to prove that earth took several million years to form and the universe in its current state too even more time to form.
Also in the Bible god creates man and woman (Adam and Eve) and all plants and animals on Earth. We have fossil records, however, that supports the claim that humans evolved from primitive ape-like mammals and there is no evidence, to my knowledge, to say that man miraculously appeared from nothing because god or gods made it so. In fact, many beings on Earth have evidence of evolution, including plants.
It seems that many religions assert that they “know” how man was made and formed; whether from gods molding them from clay or gods rising man from the dust of the Earth, traditional religions assert the creation of man from everything but a plausible and/or supported explanation, to my knowledge.
.
3.) I don’t have belief in god(s) because religion inhibits and slows intellectual progress. It seems to me that instead of providing real answers religion simply says “God did it, and that’s the truth,” which is absolutely absurd. It seems that when humans encounter something they can’t understand like the ancient Greeks and lightning, they make up an entirely fictional concept, like Zeus, and assert that it is true, without evidence. If this was ancient Greece and there was a raging thunderstorm outside people would say something along the lines of “Oh the gods! They must be angry; we must sacrifice a goat to appease them!” Not many would wonder if maybe the storm was not caused by gods, and if they did, they were thought of an insane.
Religion and religious followers seem to have such a proud disdain for saying “I don’t know why such-and-such happened” that they would rather say “Oh a sky fairy did it.” Having such an ego that they would rather make up a claim that has no logical sense then say, “Wait, we don’t know now, but maybe if we take a reasonable stand in thinking and investigating, maybe we’ll know later.” I think that it’s sad and pathetic that most don't.
In fact, if an investigation into a natural phenomena was given I an attempt to lead one closer to god and the result was instead suggestive of that no supernatural cause was involved with the phenomena, then the investigation all together was thrown out as “devil work” because of the church’s superstition over upsetting their god(s). This is most notably seen with Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus.
In modern times the church’s superstitions still attempts to inhibit proper learning in schools. Anytime a school system has trouble deciding on presenting to its students a reasonable and supported theory about the origins of life as opposed to an unsupported fairy tale about life just popping in from oblivion, there is a problem.
If we all just took the religious stance of simply believing things without thinking or investigating for ourselves and then rejecting those things that don’t fit with our beliefs, we’d still be in the Stone Age.
[/font]ask yourself this, who created you? did you come from nothing?? the obvious logical answer is god created you. in order for something to exist it must have a beginning, and in order for anything to exist there has to be an initial cause. and unmovable mover, and that is god.
but this is not meant literally. the holy scriptures say that one day to god is like a thousand years to us. the six days are not literal 24 hour days. one day could have been millions of years.
but evolution says the same thing. we came from nothing. what, did an explosion create us? it is more logical to say a divine being created us.
but the bible is a living book. dont you see how many prophecies have come true? scientists are now discovering many of the things the bible predicted thousands of years earlier.
dont you see? please, i beg you from the bottom of my heart, repent from your atheist ways and accept jesus christ as your lord and saviour before its too late.
so that on judgement day i wont have to bear witness against you.
Yeah, she's mental.About as boring as winning the lottery i'd say
GhK.
Because I'm a seeker, and as I stated, it changes often.Why wouldn't you be able post here?
Screw that, I'll post wherever I damn well like if it's not in breach of forum rules, thank you very much. Let's see... Religious Topics/Religious Debates - yep, I can post in here if I feel like it. You ignored the rest of my comment, too. Two lines, dude.6And I don't have beef with anyone, I just wanted people to state what they believe and why they believed it, not many has actually done that either...
(snip)
If you can't/won't say what you believe or can't/won't say why you believe what you believe, please do not comment.
Because I'm a seeker, and as I stated, it changes often.
Screw that, I'll post wherever I damn well like if it's not in breach of forum rules, thank you very much. Let's see... Religious Topics/Religious Debates - yep, I can post in here if I feel like it. You ignored the rest of my comment, too. Two lines, dude.
Since you're so eager to what I know, here we go.
1. I believe in God.
What is God? Thesim? Deism? Panentheism? Sure. All of them. Or a combination of the three.
Said God is conscious, eternal and pre-existent. I would like to say "omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient", etc, but these are too vague and lead way to fallacies. Can God make a rock so heavy He can't lift it? A burrito so spicy He can't eat it? A cake so delicious He can't resist it?
I don't, but it's fine if you do.2. I believe in an afterlife
What is the afterlife? Reincarnation? Rebirth? Do we await a paradise? I don't know. I would like to believe in reincarnation, but something about it does not bode well with me. Paradise sounds too ... heavenly.
3. I believe that supernatural non-physical entities that lie beyond our realm of understanding and are things that may be considered as 'demons' and 'angels' to early mankind - that they may exist.
This does not mean I believe in demonic possession and things like that.
Same here.4. I believe in extra-terrestrial entities
This doesn't mean I believe little green men are abducting people, anal probing them and mutilating cows whilst they're at it, nor do I believe reptilians are running the White House.
Okay, I don't believe this because there is no proof of a soul, but, again, it's fine if you do.5. I believe that every living organism, including the planet and the universe, and all that is, has what one may call a soul.
6. I believe in evolution, secular government, democracy, etc - but I don't believe science has all the answers, and to neglect our spirit, whatever it is, is not good for our internal wellbeing.
Why do I believe in God, in an afterlife, in souls, in aliens?
Because they make sense to me. I can understand why people may not believe in them, but I just don't think it feels "right", for lack of a better word.
Actually, it was in jest, as I am a seeker I haven't got a definite view of God, and as stated earlier, it's because my views are fluid. Tomorrow, I may not believe in non-physical entities, nor a soul, or maybe I'll believe in more than one God.I asked a simple question and instead you implied that you didn't wish to.
Wasn't there a book released called "the God Gene"? I do believe that the very nature believing in supreme forces or a supreme force is most likely part of our genetic wiring. An escapism feature, perhaps? Genetic writing by a Supreme Force? I don't know. Neither do you. Will we ever know? I doubt it.but I do think we should wonder why we might have these feelings.
Those are your words, not mine. I have never said won't consider something because it makes me uncomfortable, and I find that you believe I said that quite insulting. I said I believe in God, souls, etc because it makes sense to me, and not to believe in them doesn't feel "right". Right does not mean cozy and comfortable beliefs and wallowing in ignorance.I wonder why you won't consider why you believe something simply because it makes you uncomfortable.
[/font]
I came from my parents.?
Okay, i can accept that, but still you've not given me evidence to say that god created the universe or the earth, or that god even exist....?
such as what exactly? What prophecies do scientist say came true from the bible? And the bible is just a book. I don't know what you mean by "living book"
Before we can have a proper debate about god and religion, we must all assert exactly what is we happen to believe. So below I would like you to answer this:
[/quote]and where did they come from? dont delay the question again and again. we didnt come from nothing. something must have created us. a being with no beginning an unmovable mover, god. why is this so hard to accept? it makes logical sense, much more so than to say we came from noting. or to say we dont know. because science will never know, since we cant trace history before existence.....seems to me you just dont want to accept god because you want to be your own god.
but that was never your agrument. you gave a reason for why you dont believe in god, namely, the so called "fallacies" of the bible, one of them being "god created the world in 6 days" and i destroyed your argument by pointing out it was not literally 6 days. its simbolical. if god wanted he could have created everything in 6 seconds....
Evolution does not say this, evolution asserts that it does not yet know for certain where humans evolved from, but there is much fossil evidence to say that we evolved from primitive ape-like mammals.?
and what did the primitive abpe like mammals evolve from? some lesser form of life such as bacteria? but then where did that come from? what is the origin? science cant give us that, and it will never be able to because history cant be traced back before existence. only religion can give us that answer. why dont you accept it? its most logical. you just get a kick out of biting the hand that feeds you dont you.
the bible is not a book. its a collection of books written by many authors inspired by god... living book refers to the fact that it is still current today and people still read it today for advice on everyday situations. in otherwords it is timeless and has 0 contradictions in it. the one and only living book.
one example of prophecy is the parting of the red sea. look what recently surfaced from the bottom of the red sea.
http://www.thelightzone.net/images/pics/Exodus_Chariots/chariot_wheels.bmp
you are all about material proof. well here it is.
Stoning gays and adulterers and witches aren't the ten commandments. If you know that, then what's really wrong with the ten commandments?5. Do you follow the bible accurately? Do you follow all of the ten commandements? Do you stone gays, adulterers and witches? Do you own slaves becuase the bible says it is alright to do so?
Abscence of evidence does not equal evidence of abscence. (to quote a fellow RF member here )6. And where is the logic in believeing in a man who lives in the sky with little to none evidence to support his existence against following science and reason where there exponentially more evidence to support it's claims?
in otherwords it is timeless and has 0 contradictions in it.
Stoning gays and adulterers and witches aren't the ten commandments. If you know that, then what's really wrong with the ten commandments?
(Isn't that used in the Torah for stuff? )Are you saying God hates maryjuwanna?:sad:
Oh and here are a few bible contradictions:
GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.
Stoning gays and adulterers and witches aren't the ten commandments. If you know that, then what's really wrong with the ten commandments?
Abscence of evidence does not equal evidence of abscence. (to quote a fellow RF member here )
All religions are false. All concepts are false.
Cosmology, religion, concepts are all maps.
It is useful to to have a map if you are tryign to find your way. But the map is not the territory.
Thus the only way to know God is to experience God.
In order to know what an apple tastes like, you must eat one.
Truth is beyond concept, but is experiental.
...
"He Who Is is ineffable. No principle knew him, no authority, no subjection, nor any creature from the foundation of the world until now, except he alone, and anyone to whom he wants to make revelation through him who is from First Light. From now on, I am the Great Savior. For he is immortal and eternal. Now he is eternal, having no birth; for everyone who has birth will perish. He is unbegotten, having no beginning; for everyone who has a beginning has an end. Since no one rules over him, he has no name; for whoever has a name is the creation of another."
--The Sophia of Jesus Christ
I am the one whom they call Life, and you have called Death. I am the one whom they call Law, and you have called Lawlessness. I am the one whom you have pursued, and I am the one whom you have seized. I am the one whom you have scattered, and you have gathered me together. I am the one before whom you have been ashamed, and you have been shameless to me. I am she who does not keep festival, and I am she whose festivals are many. I, I am godless, and I am the one whose God is great. I am the one whom you have reflected upon, and you have scorned me. I am unlearned, and they learn from me. I am the one that you have despised, and you reflect upon me. I am the one whom you have hidden from, and you appear to me. But whenever you hide yourselves, I myself will appear. For whenever you appear, I myself will hide from you.
--Thunder the Perfect Mind
I am androgynous. I am Mother (and) I am Father, since I copulate with myself. I copulated with myself and with those who love me, and it is through me alone that the All stands firm. I am the Womb that gives shape to the All by giving birth to the Light that shines in splendor. I am the Aeon to come. I am the fulfillment of the All, that is, Meirothea, the glory of the Mother. I cast voiced Speech into the ears of those who know me.
--Trimorphic Prottenoia
Funny. That's some strange askin'.I wasn't saying that stoning gays and etc are in the ten commandements. I was essentially asking if ortega was a bible lieralist.
Fail.And i've never said nor have i ever thought that absence of evidence equals evidence of absence, but I think it would be logically right to assume so.
To say something does not exist which is something outside of our understanding or current methods of scientific advancement do not mean something does not exist.When there is no evidence to say that something exists it would not be right to assert that it does, neither is it right to assert that it doesn't but you could probably supply enough evidence to say that your assertion is more valid than the former.
That is bigotry of the highest order. Can't they just be misguided or wrong?I believe however that one isn't completely sane or rational if they believe that something exists without reason or ability to produce evidence.
Is this just another thinly veiled thread enbaling others to discuss how stooopid you think the bible is?