zakir naik is not dared to invite intelligent hindu scholars for debate, he does all the home work to challenge hindu scriptures and then he invites less intellectual hindu saints as guest. Once these saints are in the stage, zakir shows his real intention, he starts to question hindu scriptures and the saints gets cheated before the big crowd. To the dualists he asks about non-dualism and to non-dualist he asks about dualism. People often describe zakir naik is a juvenile in character.
If we take ur words as proof, 1st bring any auuthentic source or proof to justify ur statement, living in India, where Hindus are in vast majority, he is giving lectures, so y dont India govt or hindus there protest? I never came acrros a single prrotest or statement y any known hindu scholar against him? beside there is annother 10 day conferecen being held in Bombay on 30 oct, in which scholars from all over the world, even non-muslims are taking part, y did Indian govt, which is Hindu based allow him?
If hindu saints are cheated, means hindus are very lack i knowledge in their faith, and they dnt knw wat they are following? those ppl sayy negative about him, who have lost their debates, and have negative approach in their minds.If some non-muslim scholar do this on large scale, and tell wrong mis-conception of Islam, any muslim will straight away point on him that he is saying wrong, and this is wrong concept, y havent any hindu ever raised in the audience, or in media, or from govt. or religious schoilar?
And for the crowd, it does not matter. They are hungry to see anything or anyone praising islam. Hitler too had a big crowd behind him, that does not justifies him, same in the case of islamic terrorists. If you feels he is right just posts his views here, we shall discuss those .
ur statement here is childish, ppl come to listen, y do non-muslims come to the gathering? soome 1 is forcing them to come there> bring ur proof of Islammic terrorists, already I said, dnt say words, which u dont know, come with some proofs, otherwise its just a talk of a looser. His work is showing he is brining all the religio close, not making them far, but pplz like u dnt like, and love to keeeo the differences, dats y u ppl dnt like harmony and peace in the world
zakir naik is a juvenile, liar and terrorism well wisher. He has his own explanations on vedas and buddhism. He alters vedic texts to develop confusion in ignorant people and also in favor of islam.
I posted already the link to his website, go there and tell he is a liar and whateverr, just negatively saying without any proof, just shows how negative ur approach is, and how mature u r, as fir him, he is internationaly recognised, wat about u? show me proof of wat u said, did he altered vedic by himself? its self quote from vedic, but some1 said here throw and burn the vedics, geetas etc etc, they meann nothing to Hindus, show me where he said he is terrorism lover? come with proofs brother, dnt show ur negative approach to every1 here
An article found in his website
could;nt understannd wat u want to show here, doesnt make any sennse of ur statement brother
this shows how matured zakir is and what he is upto.
